The first thing I look at is the general idea of the project and if they have an MVP (alpha, beta) and if the project really needs the blockchain.
Then the team, advisers, experience, previous projects.
The whitepaper should be complete and with good information about the project.
Topic: Which factor is the most important for you when you evaluate an ICO? (Read 520 times)
June 02, 2018, 04:40:16 PM
I love to see the ratings along with good advices from my mates, plus always a good community support inside the ICO porject is important!
June 02, 2018, 02:33:53 AM
Since I try to select an ICO whose token would be very promising for price growth in the future, for me the direction of the project's activities is very important, and therefore the scope of the issued token. That's why I pay attention first of all. Also, I look, of course, on the parameters relating to the size of payments and the decent value of the token itself. This is the number of tokens assigned to the campaign, and their estimated price on the exchange, and even the number of signatories joining the ICO signature campaign.
June 02, 2018, 01:52:20 AM
As of now, many ICO is launched everyday. And as we investors, we dont want to be scammed by any ICO, so we want to make sure that the ICO that we plan to invest is a legit and has a promising features. May I ask which factor is the most important in evaluating an ICO.
A big factor in the better ICOs is now e can't see which can make it different from another low quality ICOs , because the most of the ICOs are giving full options to show ICO as a guinine platform and having better better better concept behind the base of the coin .But in actual in my opinion all are the formalities that we can see in every ICOs project .
In my opinion the perfect ICO is that which is spending much amount of money in the advertisement and as we know that if they get better investment then surely will make Thier ICO as a better investment platform to make better earnings , otherwise all are equally like .
June 01, 2018, 08:50:07 PM
I think that the factor you should consider is the ICO team and the members. Other factor is you shoud check it's platform and the blockchain technology it can offer to the public. If you are a bounty hunter, you need to check the bounty manager of such ICO and check on the spreadsheet for the bounty participants if there are many higher ranking members joining.
June 01, 2018, 07:26:11 PM
Thank you for the topic.
June 01, 2018, 06:06:00 PM
this thread already has so many replies, but someone who might be looking for some information on this topic,
and/or wants to add their opinion in a more 'structured' way, here's a thread about it
and/or wants to add their opinion in a more 'structured' way, here's a thread about it
June 01, 2018, 06:03:36 PM
For me,it is the team.I check for the expertise and the integrity of the team members and advisers.If they have a fraudulent past or organize a ponzi scheme that scammed people in the past,then the project is scamy.Also,I check if the team has what it takes to carry out what they wrote in the whitepaper.
June 01, 2018, 05:55:53 PM
The team profile and background is the most important factor to consider, since most successful ICO is due to the competence of the team. My next is to analyze the whitepapa and prototype of what the money will be use for
June 01, 2018, 05:50:01 PM
I thinkt hat one of the things that i am most looking before investing is the level of creativity that the team has (it is more than important) and also, the amount of money that they have already raised till then.
June 01, 2018, 05:43:28 PM
The team: who are they? What have they accomplished? Etc. Then how strong and active is the community? Are they just tweeting once in a blue moon? Then, the project. What's the significance of the project? What's it going to solve.
June 01, 2018, 05:22:41 PM
their team members, if the team members from the project showing up the real face and social media link wich mean linkedin , twitter etc
i believe they will not scam us, then i will read the whitepaper carefully my friend
You mean a real product that developed by a real person that at least should be known widely right? Other than that you might have to go for a 50/50 between legit or not. That's true , I would feel so secure investing the money on that kind ico. It's really matter who run the business , what kind future prospect and how the roadmap makes sense for everyone. i believe they will not scam us, then i will read the whitepaper carefully my friend
June 01, 2018, 05:17:19 PM
At first, you have to see their community, is their community will act with a significant amount, and if their ico rating and profile will good, if they have expert ratings from icobench, if their admin will busy with a regular update then I think that project will hit. But all the time, you will not make the right decision because some scammers are really very smart and talented, like a hashcard project's owner. So, you have to look at them carefully. Good luck.
June 01, 2018, 05:11:35 PM
As of now, many ICO is launched everyday. And as we investors, we dont want to be scammed by any ICO, so we want to make sure that the ICO that we plan to invest is a legit and has a promising features. May I ask which factor is the most important in evaluating an ICO.
For me, the main factor is the project idea, the presence of the MVP, and of course the team. There must be professionalsthis is important because in this website, people who expert in crypto will give a review about ICO project and giving the opinion about the project, that's a good way to choose a best ICO's
June 01, 2018, 04:56:22 PM
As of now, many ICO is launched everyday. And as we investors, we dont want to be scammed by any ICO, so we want to make sure that the ICO that we plan to invest is a legit and has a promising features. May I ask which factor is the most important in evaluating an ICO.
The most important factor for me is the project team and team of advisers. I think it's basic
June 01, 2018, 04:53:53 PM
As of now, many ICO is launched everyday. And as we investors, we dont want to be scammed by any ICO, so we want to make sure that the ICO that we plan to invest is a legit and has a promising features. May I ask which factor is the most important in evaluating an ICO.
For me, the main factor is the project idea, the presence of the MVP, and of course the team. There must be professionals June 01, 2018, 04:51:41 PM
The most important factor would be for me the way that the team is set up around the project, if they do not look like they are working on the coin for the future then its a no
The most important factor for me is the project team and team of advisers. I think it's basic
As on what ive experien on the past , ive joined a lot of bounty ico campaigns with a good solid team and as i notice almost all ico that i came across has always compose of a professional memebers , i guess that is really required in order to attract a lot of investors.
So my point is i dont think a good ico can only be indentified by their team members but rather a good ico for me is depends on thier purpose or usefullness of thier projects.
But even though you consider to check and look for all these characteristics and traits, there is stilll a chance that an ico could lead to failure or become unsucesful due to some reasons.
June 01, 2018, 04:36:16 PM
As of now, many ICO is launched everyday. And as we investors, we dont want to be scammed by any ICO, so we want to make sure that the ICO that we plan to invest is a legit and has a promising features. May I ask which factor is the most important in evaluating an ICO.
The most important factor for me is the project team and team of advisers. I think it's basic June 01, 2018, 04:34:28 PM
For me, I try to look at if they have a working MVP or if they're already making a profit.
Either that or the background of the development team, their experience, if they can be trusted and so on.
Either that or the background of the development team, their experience, if they can be trusted and so on.
June 01, 2018, 04:25:48 PM
The most important factor would be for me the way that the team is set up around the project, if they do not look like they are working on the coin for the future then its a no
Jump to: