a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.
The roadmap is indeed very important for a project, especially to attract investors and the trust of the community and the roadmap must run according to the date,
but if a project with good fundamentals fails to carry out several roadmaps, I think there is no problem, because they must have reasons, it doesn't mean their project failed. ,
for example Ethereum, Ethereum had promised a roadmap for ETH 2.0 which was launched last year, but unfortunately there was a problem, and finally did it this year.
Good projects will always keep their promises. Moreover, new projects that want to attract the attention of many investors must really ensure that
the roadmap runs according to the scheduled time. Because if new projects run the roadmap there is a delay and it doesn't match the previously
set date, this can reduce investors confidence in these projects. In contrast to what happened to Ethereum they experienced a delay in the launch of
ETH 2.0, many investors can understand it because Ethereum already has a good reputation. While new projects that are still building their reputation,
should be punctual in executing the roadmap to be able to give a good impression to investors. So these new projects can show a professional attitude
and finally many investors are interested in investing in these new projects.