Which one do you think its more healthy for a project - page 3.

popeye95

full member

Activity: 398

Merit: 100

Quote from: judeafante on August 12, 2022, 01:58:34 AM

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

The majority of investors are impatient, they can take projects that are fast in setting up their platform but they are impatient on projects where there's too much delay in the implementation of the roadmap and setting up the platform, they want to see action, updates and see if the developers are really capable, projects never get bad feedbacks if they rush things but they deserve a flag for so many delays, I don't trust projects where there are the absence of updates.

Yes, the majority of investors want development to speed up and you're right about that. But missing the timeline in the plan roadmap for a young and upstart project show this team can't keep up with what they've promised. Bad planning, missing deadline, ETA for roadmap being a placebo and not accurate at all,... All of those are signs showing this project is not worth and seems too risky.

ningrum

full member

Activity: 1610

Merit: 103

The OGz Club

Quote from: Jatiluhung on August 11, 2022, 11:25:24 PM

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

The roadmap is indeed very important for a project, especially to attract investors and the trust of the community and the roadmap must run according to the date,
but if a project with good fundamentals fails to carry out several roadmaps, I think there is no problem, because they must have reasons, it doesn't mean their project failed. ,
for example Ethereum, Ethereum had promised a roadmap for ETH 2.0 which was launched last year, but unfortunately there was a problem, and finally did it this year.

judeafante

sr. member

Activity: 2254

Merit: 258

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

The majority of investors are impatient, they can take projects that are fast in setting up their platform but they are impatient on projects where there's too much delay in the implementation of the roadmap and setting up the platform, they want to see action, updates and see if the developers are really capable, projects never get bad feedbacks if they rush things but they deserve a flag for so many delays, I don't trust projects where there are the absence of updates.

Minecache

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1024

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: TimeTeller on August 11, 2022, 07:40:32 PM

Quote from: rugrats on August 11, 2022, 07:22:35 PM

Quote from: vanesha on August 09, 2022, 05:14:06 AM

it will be healthier for those who strictly follow their roadmap. I saw many of them stalled due to market conditions so the delay brought the roadmap to a halt and the community faded away. I understand being in a negative market will definitely have an impact on public sales and launch prices but I think it will break even with the trust from the community for a project that always follows the roadmap on time.

Strictly following the roadmap is something everyone wants, but as you say, it is difficult or even impossible because there will be so many impacts that we cannot foresee. The delay is there, we can sympathize with them as long as they always update and give regular reports to investors instead of delay and silence.

Usually the delay is coming from the lack of funds or having insufficient funds.
So most projects can't move forward if they have no funds to begin with.
They have very good concept but if they can't secure funding, that's when they won't follow their roadmap.
This is why it is better to tap private investors if you do have promising concept. Don't rely from public sale.

Nowadays, there are very few publicly funded projects, the ICO form of crowdfunding is no longer active. As can be seen, current projects have raised hundreds of millions of USD from angel investors and large investment funds.
Therefore, lack of capital is not possible with top projects.
I think what causes their delay could be some technical issue like in case of ADA they are always late with their updates, but they still work hard and always update important information for investors, updates once released are almost error-free.

gunhell16

sr. member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 453

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

That's why it's still important for a new project that will appear in the world of cryptocurrency to immediately have a Whitepaper, Roadmap, Team management, and transparency, especially if it will be managed by Bounty Managers whose criteria should be like those of reputable ones. BM here in this forum such as @Icopress, @Darkstar, @Cryptobrainboss, and others who rank high here in this platform can be said to be an advantage in the new projects that they will manage here.

Also, I don't mean that all the newbies who manage a project here in this forum are not legit, that's not what I want, as long as there is a development that is happening well and agree with their flow in the roadmap, it can be said that one this legitimate project of course.

Jatiluhung

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 392

a new project that is slightly off the roadmap. or late to meet the roadmap. sometimes a potential scam. Healthy projects usually don't prompt them to buy. projects that are too many orders to buy with the lure of crazy profits really need to be wary of.

goinmerry

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1083

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

If things are rushed then it looks like these projects are not really serious.

How can they provide a better service if they are rushing things? How can they be sure that no problem will arise if they rushed their development? A good project shouldn't rush and should follow its roadmap at any cost.

If things were executed properly and smoothly on the roadmap, that's a + for investors and they might attract people too to be involved in their project.

Kelvinid

sr. member

Activity: 2786

Merit: 343

when lambo...

Quote from: rugrats on August 11, 2022, 07:22:35 PM

Quote from: vanesha on August 09, 2022, 05:14:06 AM

it will be healthier for those who strictly follow their roadmap. I saw many of them stalled due to market conditions so the delay brought the roadmap to a halt and the community faded away. I understand being in a negative market will definitely have an impact on public sales and launch prices but I think it will break even with the trust from the community for a project that always follows the roadmap on time.

Strictly following the roadmap is something everyone wants, but as you say, it is difficult or even impossible because there will be so many impacts that we cannot foresee. The delay is there, we can sympathize with them as long as they always update and give regular reports to investors instead of delay and silence.

Delays may be considered but doing shortcuts can make some negative assumptions about the legitimacy of the project and a sort of negative speculations. I guess we don't want to see the project with that as we know that TRUST is very important. That is why they should have to do their best to follow what has been stated on the roadmap, otherwise it could be a reason for the investors to become doubted and might their option not to invest this anymore.

TimeTeller

hero member

Activity: 2646

Merit: 588

Quote from: rugrats on August 11, 2022, 07:22:35 PM

Quote from: vanesha on August 09, 2022, 05:14:06 AM

it will be healthier for those who strictly follow their roadmap. I saw many of them stalled due to market conditions so the delay brought the roadmap to a halt and the community faded away. I understand being in a negative market will definitely have an impact on public sales and launch prices but I think it will break even with the trust from the community for a project that always follows the roadmap on time.

Strictly following the roadmap is something everyone wants, but as you say, it is difficult or even impossible because there will be so many impacts that we cannot foresee. The delay is there, we can sympathize with them as long as they always update and give regular reports to investors instead of delay and silence.

Usually the delay is coming from the lack of funds or having insufficient funds.
So most projects can't move forward if they have no funds to begin with.
They have very good concept but if they can't secure funding, that's when they won't follow their roadmap.
This is why it is better to tap private investors if you do have promising concept. Don't rely from public sale.

LastKiss

sr. member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 251

Binance #Smart World Global Token

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Well if that project follows exactly the roadmap and the date still more or less then the project is doing fine I guess, many projects delay their progress nowadays because bear market as their excuse. They want their progress done along with a pump on their token price since in this bear market many people leave crypto there are not many people left who want to invest in a new projects. Rush everything absolutely not healthy as a new project.

rugrats

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 250

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: vanesha on August 09, 2022, 05:14:06 AM

it will be healthier for those who strictly follow their roadmap. I saw many of them stalled due to market conditions so the delay brought the roadmap to a halt and the community faded away. I understand being in a negative market will definitely have an impact on public sales and launch prices but I think it will break even with the trust from the community for a project that always follows the roadmap on time.

Strictly following the roadmap is something everyone wants, but as you say, it is difficult or even impossible because there will be so many impacts that we cannot foresee. The delay is there, we can sympathize with them as long as they always update and give regular reports to investors instead of delay and silence.

Rufsilf

sr. member

Activity: 1708

Merit: 308

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The Roadmap is a sort of basis to see that the developer is following the plan and the basis of its transparency to know where it was. It certainly takes so long if they follow the roadmap and in most cases, developers find a way to make shortcuts but unfortunately, this will lead to a worse scenario and make investors think there is something behind this project that turns them off from trusting.

They should have not done this in the first place once the roadmap is already published just to stop avoid any negative speculations. Or trust issues.

Rengga Jati

hero member

Activity: 1932

Merit: 622

ROLLBIT > Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

What new projects need is how they can enter the market and be accepted by people so that they are willing to trade or buy and sell activities or invest in tokens or coins from the new project. The more developers have a lot of money, the better because they can list their new tokens on top exchanges or carry out various promotions so that the project is very famous, especially during listings so that it attracts people to trade.
Furthermore, after being able to attract many people, the next task is to develop the product or use case of the token. In addition, by providing strong developments according to the roadmap, it can make the project solid, especially considering the holders and community of the project.

harizen

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1398

For support ➡️ help.bc.game

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

There should be a respective timeline for their development plans, why rush things? Any good significance in doing that?

Aside from that, it's not even possible to do such rush plans as it might just result in poor execution.

That's why there's a timeline to give time to fully prepare for those respective tasks on the lineup.

It's common that most projects can't follow their roadmap but they should provide a valid reason for such delays. If it's reasonable, then you can extend your patience. If it's not, then clearly the project is not serious about doing their best to meet its goals.

trendcoin

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1131

I think they act according to the state of the market. If the market goes well, they explain the developments on their roadmap. If the market goes bad, they delay the developments on their roadmap. They create a story for themselves. I don't blame them because they act in their own best interests. I think it's bad behavior, but they have to do it.

TastyChillySauce00

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1028

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

I personally believe if a project that can follow all of its roadmap will become a healthy project and why? this project can fulfill their promise and so the developers show its competence to develop the future of platforms. You can imagine if the developers already mentioned big exchange listing on its roadmap and then it comes true and you will be getting a lot of benefit from there. This is why always following the project that can fulfill their promise is a must

Silberman

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1327

Quote from: justdimin on August 09, 2022, 11:48:16 AM

Quote from: Silberman on August 08, 2022, 03:53:47 AM

Rushing things up is never a good idea especially when we consider the nature of cryptocurrencies, a single mistake can be more than enough for hackers to take advantage of the situation and steal millions of dollars, and we have examples of this almost every week, so without a doubt it is better for the developers of new coins to take their time when developing their coins and even more importantly to not impose themselves milestones they will not be able to achieve, because when they fail to follow their roadmap and fall behind it their investors will begin to lose confidence in them.

That’s a problem that new projects have because they do not care about the aftermath of the release. They care about the situation they are in until they make their money, when the team gets their funding and then the project gets hacked or anything, all they think about is the fact that they still have the money for it and that’s fine.

As long as we have teams behind projects that only care about their own situation and that’s fine, we shouldn't really be shocked about it because they would of course think about their pocket first. But the ones that care about creating a new thing, a new innovation to blockchain tech? That’s what will go up a lot for sure, and that’s what we should invest into.

It is common that developers do not care about it, after all since we have so many coins in the market developers feel they need to give results as fast as possible to gain the attention of the community, but the problem with this approach is that sooner or later a hacker may realize of the several weaknesses that exist in the code and then they will take advantage of it, but by the time the hack is discovered there is not much to do, and the project and their developers will lose their reputation and the ability to bring fresh funds to their project.

WalkerIVIV

hero member

Activity: 2436

Merit: 503

Cryptocasino.com

I think having delay is okay as long as there is reasoning behind it and considering the fact that if the delay was truly necessary and if they forcefully push their development then the results will be bad.
I think even startups in real world are also having delay and that's definitely fine. Moreover I think these delays are kinda irrelevant with the value of the coin itself since usually the result is the thing that matters more.

isaac_clarke22

sr. member

Activity: 1596

Merit: 264

Quote from: crwth on August 08, 2022, 11:28:20 PM

~

I can recall one of my colleagues joining one of the NFT hypes that was a casino-related and they surely waited for the mint of the NFTs this June, but it turned out to be just a dud. The NFT sale got delayed and they were forced to halt the marketing campaign and just focused on getting sales for now.
There are times that these happen and it sucks for them.

justdimin

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 670

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Silberman on August 08, 2022, 03:53:47 AM

Quote from: Ketesnuko on August 07, 2022, 05:15:44 AM

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Rushing things up is never a good idea especially when we consider the nature of cryptocurrencies, a single mistake can be more than enough for hackers to take advantage of the situation and steal millions of dollars, and we have examples of this almost every week, so without a doubt it is better for the developers of new coins to take their time when developing their coins and even more importantly to not impose themselves milestones they will not be able to achieve, because when they fail to follow their roadmap and fall behind it their investors will begin to lose confidence in them.

That’s a problem that new projects have because they do not care about the aftermath of the release. They care about the situation they are in until they make their money, when the team gets their funding and then the project gets hacked or anything, all they think about is the fact that they still have the money for it and that’s fine.

As long as we have teams behind projects that only care about their own situation and that’s fine, we shouldn't really be shocked about it because they would of course think about their pocket first. But the ones that care about creating a new thing, a new innovation to blockchain tech? That’s what will go up a lot for sure, and that’s what we should invest into.

Topic: Which one do you think its more healthy for a project - page 3. (Read 748 times)