IEO is for the project to put the token first in an exchange. Mostly they create their own trading platform for that purpose.
Next is the bounty. That is for advertisement.
Just for people or investors to see that a project is going on and it could be bought at this certain website.
I dont think a bounty should come first. How are you the investors going to end up buying it without information?
Topic: Which one makes sense - page 2. (Read 793 times)
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
This depends largely on your targeted investors, you might run the bounty first then proceed to fund raising because people are already aware of your project, alternatively you can run both together but never make mistake of trying to raise fund before bounty unless you have private investors.
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
As long as you are promoting a promising bounty or ICO then it doesn't matter which one should come first and I think both of them bounty and ICO can have possibly had a scam so it is depend, so before promoting a bounty or ICO make sure that you check their project 1st than to waste your time promoting them. 
Either of the two could lead you to nothing if it ends up to be a scam so why not just get through it before the project runs. You have the option to maximize the stakes given anyway so why not that?
Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.
Everything here for now is full of risk, which I think that there is no way that we can avoid it if we want to continue to be a part of this bounty hunting, so it is either we give up completely or we just keep pressing till we get the right project that will not maltreat us bounty hunters. Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.
Most of the projects that we have now can really not be predicted, and like you said, there is still possibility of them scamming even if we join the campaign along the line, so better we join at the early stage, though we still have to look at it In the aspect of our time, it would have saved our time also if the period we took part in the project is when they have started raising fund, and if they eventually scam, it will still not be like the period that we have used on them from the beginning.
Either of the two could lead you to nothing if it ends up to be a scam so why not just get through it before the project runs. You have the option to maximize the stakes given anyway so why not that?
Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.
You have made some point certainly. All would turn out to be useless if the chosen project is not capable of returning any profits. The market is full of scams and before participating into bounties, it is best to do deep researches on one’s own. Once that step is cleared, go with running bounty while the fundraising is taking place. That way, he wont have to wait for long to make good bucks.Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.
I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure
If you do know that you are very bad in this case and i can't even understand what was your point. what you are saying in your post is about to tell others about your personal story and no more. What do you mean about "its use case". Dude, wake up from your sleep. no one asks you about have you watched the schedule of the fundraising or not because that's probably your fault. in this case, OP is talking about joining in the bounty when the ico is still in progress or it's not yet started. 
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
I would suggest running a bounty during the crowdsale or fundraising in order to have parallelism with the outcome. If one would go first, the hype or popularity of the project has a tendency to fade. Also, this kind of process is what I saw to the previous successful projects in this industry, which is in my opinion, proving it to be effective if not interrupted by the market situation. I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure
If you do know that you are very bad in this case and i can't even understand what was your point. what you are saying in your post is about to tell others about your personal story and no more. What do you mean about "its use case". Dude, wake up from your sleep. no one asks you about have you watched the schedule of the fundraising or not because that's probably your fault. in this case, OP is talking about joining in the bounty when the ico is still in progress or it's not yet started. Either of the two could lead you to nothing if it ends up to be a scam so why not just get through it before the project runs. You have the option to maximize the stakes given anyway so why not that?
Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.
You have made some point certainly. All would turn out to be useless if the chosen project is not capable of returning any profits. The market is full of scams and before participating into bounties, it is best to do deep researches on one’s own. Once that step is cleared, go with running bounty while the fundraising is taking place. That way, he wont have to wait for long to make good bucks. Just make sure you made your research in search of possible fraud or scam, it'll be worth the work and efforts in the end.
I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
If you are looking for a higher stake or much more higher reward then join before they even starts the fund raising.But it is also risky sincewe wouldn't know if they would be successful or not.
But if you want to secure your reward then join the bounty campaign that have an ongoing fund raising that already have a huge amount of investment.
It does not matter at all, there are enough examples of success and failures in both cases. More importantly to research the project before getting into bounty or investment, otherwise even IEO sale can turn out to be a scam.
I think it's better to run the bounty when the fundraising is going on. Now is the time that the project before you run the project you need to have investors who are willing to invest in them. But then you can raise the interest of other people.
One way or another, the team of each project should be aware that an increase in investment interest in the project occurs during the active phase of discussing this project and advertising all the information about it. Based on this, in my opinion, the Bounty of the company and the attraction of investment funds should occur at the same time, since this is one whole process. 
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
Before fundraising started you need to promote the project using bounty platform so try to be more effective in choosing the right manager for your project.
Or else If you have good private investor then you don't need to worry about anyone and you start Bounty promotion at the time of fundraising also.
Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
Majority of the ICO are running their bounty before their ICO/IEO fund raising, this is to create longer awareness, investors wants to see how the project evolve while in the bounty campaign, they want feed backs coming from the community, and of course experts opinion, this is also to better prepare investors of their funds but be sure that you a running a legit project because members will scrutinize your project. Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
I better go on the second one. It is better to participate or invest in a bounty who are on the run of fundraising. I just feel that it is more somehow kinda robust assurance that the project are already going halfway through successfulness rather than before that you did not even know if it will be going okay or not. It is just a trick to climb up in a project who you knew have a path towards success. Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need
I think that it is better to go for bounty project when fundraising is already going on because with that, you will be able to know which project may likely hit their cap which will still give you the chance of getting paid unlike after you have ran a bounty from the beginning and after a very long time of dedicating your time and resources, the project will end up not meeting up with their cap and thereby cancelling the campaign and not paying the hunters a dime of even the previous work they have done which is understandable because there is no way that they can make payment from money they have not generated, which is the part of the scarifies sometimes in this bounty hunter. We must also try and check every project too before we go for it because some scam project do reach their softcap.
I think it's better to run the bounty when the fundraising is going on. Now is the time that the project before you run the project you need to have investors who are willing to invest in them. But then you can raise the interest of other people.
It' s up to your capacity. If you have lot of time so you can go with run bounty while fundraising is going on becauae I know it is not hard if you have more time that you can focus on what you are doing but if you want to play safe and to the more focused and to have fund as capital you can go to join bounty first but I think this startegy is fot for the newbies.
I will go with fundraising going the same time as the bounty program. The bounty program is supposed to raise more awareness, so more people can show interest and invest in a project. So, if the fundraising is done at the same time as bounty, there is a higher possibility of projects reaching their set target fund.
I would also suggest going for the bounty program first so that masses can actually understand the project well and make up their minds to invest. Bounty programs sole purpose is to teach public about the features of project. This will indeed help investors in taking right decision. However, this does not mean there should not be even a bit of fund raising simultaneously. That can leave some doubts among investors. Jump to: