Poor people only have the will to work and the energy used to work, whereas the rich have the money to pay all the workers. Solving the problems of the poor has no continuity with other parties, they do not have the ability financially to solve the problems of the people around them.
I prefer to solve the problems of the rich because they have the facilities to develop and can solve the problems of the poor. In general what we often encounter in everyday life rich people always provide services to poor people to make a living. So solving the problems of the rich is more effective than solving the problems of the poor because the rich can provide employment facilities to the poor, while the poor cannot afford to employ the rich.
Topic: Which problem will you choose to solve? - page 8. (Read 1373 times)
Solving the problem of one rich person can save thousands of jobs so it depends on who is that rich person and what is their problem.
If you see more replies that say to solve the problems of more poor people then its not a wonder because that is the right thing from an ethical Point of View.
Yes OG , it depends on who is that rich person and what their problem is. Rich people are already problem solvers, so helping a problem solver solve his problem would help him solve others problems more effectively. That's also going to make me an indirect problem solver hitting 2 birds with one stone. If you see more replies that say to solve the problems of more poor people then its not a wonder because that is the right thing from an ethical Point of View.
Now the thing is the explanation above is ethical only when the problem I'm actually solving is one that isn't of the self interest of the rich person, cause then I would just be making the rich richer...
Personally, solving the problem of the poor will be the best because they will never look down on you and they will bless and pray for you. The rich feels that the moment you have been paid for a service rendered to them, they owe you nothing and that is the end. A poor man will never forget and if he can sing your praises. A poor man needs more attention than a rich man because they are vulnerable, unlike the rich man that can get alternatives.
That will be the duty of the government but the rich people can also contribute to helping the poor. Maybe the rich people can help by giving them a job in one of their offices so that the poor people can earn money from their work. But it takes effort to get a job from a rich person because many people want to try it.Assistance from the government can be in the form of jobs, social services, or something else that can help the poor people to survive. If their basic needs have been met, the poor people will try to make money by looking for work so they are no longer dependent on anyone. Poor people also want to be independent but unfortunately, they don't get the opportunity to do so.
And I agree with you that poor people need more attention than rich people because there are limitations to doing things like others. But poor people still don't give up on their situation and will keep fighting until they can succeed like other people.
I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)
I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.
Even after solving the problem of the rich, if there is a fault anywhere, the rich will not panic, they will talk calmly about it. I am speaking from the experience of rendering services. I have rendered services to both the rich and the poor. After fixing a particular thing for the poor, and there is slight fault or error they will panic as if their money is gone or as if the world is ending that day the rich whose problem is very limited does not stress the problem solver.
Solving the problem of one rich person can save thousands of jobs so it depends on who is that rich person and what is their problem.
If you see more replies that say to solve the problems of more poor people then its not a wonder because that is the right thing from an ethical Point of View.
If you see more replies that say to solve the problems of more poor people then its not a wonder because that is the right thing from an ethical Point of View.
I do not think it is wise to assume that by solving a rich persons problem, that this will automatically transfer to the problem solving of the poor people. In most cases, it will make the rich person richer, while the poor stay poor. The rich have no qualms about exploiting the poor, even when it is completely unnecessary. All they care about are their own egos and money. Look at Elon Musk. What exactly has he done to further humanity? Only empty promises and ego-stroking on social media.
Personally, solving the problem of the poor will be the best because they will never look down on you and they will bless and pray for you. The rich feels that the moment you have been paid for a service rendered to them, they owe you nothing and that is the end. A poor man will never forget and if he can sing your praises. A poor man needs more attention than a rich man because they are vulnerable, unlike the rich man that can get alternatives.
Rich people are not people who expect attention or pity from other people who are not richer than them or other people who are in the same caste position as them. So the two are not the same nor is it worth comparing, because in general everyone who gets help from other people in any case will always want to praise the person who helped him.
And that's regardless of whether the person is rich or not, because the person who gets the assistance will also not immediately see the person helping him in terms of the wealth owned by that person. So this also depends on the intention of the person who wants to provide assistance to those who need it and that person will also not wait for himself to be rich first so that he can help other people who are experiencing difficulties, such as the example of the poor.
For me I'll choose to solve the problems of the poor than the rich because to me I don't see the problems of the rich as something to worry about, they (the rich) do know how to get in and out of their problems but the poor don't.
By solving the problems of the poor, I can gain more by doing so, imagine I help out the poor, by giving them shelter food clothes and everything they need to stay alive and comfortable, I can as well employ them to work for me in return as a businessman, with that alone I think I have solved their problems and also gain more because the more man power I get to expand my business the more money I get to cover for what I spent on them, is a 50/50 thing.
By solving the problems of the poor, I can gain more by doing so, imagine I help out the poor, by giving them shelter food clothes and everything they need to stay alive and comfortable, I can as well employ them to work for me in return as a businessman, with that alone I think I have solved their problems and also gain more because the more man power I get to expand my business the more money I get to cover for what I spent on them, is a 50/50 thing.
I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)
I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.
Yeah, very complex reason. And I think that even with these billionaires or trillionaires able to solve the world's hunger and poverty, it just can't happen. While there are people who deals with poverty, there's also the money that flows within remaining on this problem and that's why they're stopping any possible solution that's being brought to raise awareness or deal with poverty or any problem that results with that. It's hard to make a solution when you're not committed on it and if you are but the major motivator is money.
What is happening in the world right now is like that, no matter how much people have money they will still look for it again for more, between greed and fear of running out, it all goes back to today's humans who never feel enough so don't expect them to let wealth possessed to overcome this,there are actually some of them that are the cause of poverty.
I agree that there are some of them that do things that make the people can't go out of poverty. Even in our country, there are oligarchs that have solved problems but then, they're also the reason why many can't get out of poverty.Well, being rich or successful doesn't matter when you are happy. Learning to be happy with what you have is the best way to live. Not having problems being poor is going to be the best.
While I do agree with what you've said, it's just we have to choose on which things we'll be happy. Poor or rich, we've got our own definition and ways of being happy. But I'd rather be the person who's happy but not problematic financially.
I choose "solve the problem of the poor". Most likely, the problem of the poor is hunger. If you get feed 3 times a day 365 for the rest of your life, then all you can focus on is your dream. Let's just say, no matter what, you will get food. Doesn't matter if you work or not! If that's the case, then other problems could be solved easily because you can focus on them better. And when those are solved, you can focus on dreams. And that's the definition of happiness. Isn't it?
And if that happens, maybe poor people can become rich or successful. Well, being rich or successful doesn't matter when you are happy. Learning to be happy with what you have is the best way to live. Not having problems being poor is going to be the best.
And if that happens, maybe poor people can become rich or successful. Well, being rich or successful doesn't matter when you are happy. Learning to be happy with what you have is the best way to live. Not having problems being poor is going to be the best.
Personally, solving the problem of the poor will be the best because they will never look down on you and they will bless and pray for you. The rich feels that the moment you have been paid for a service rendered to them, they owe you nothing and that is the end. A poor man will never forget and if he can sing your praises. A poor man needs more attention than a rich man because they are vulnerable, unlike the rich man that can get alternatives.
Not all of them are like that, that is included in the personal person who gives gratitude, but indeed most of the poor and rich people have a different mindset about this, but I can only emphasize that it does not include everything.But the logical reason when we choose to help the poor is their limitations which are different from the rich, people can do it and there will even be many people who will solve their problems whether it's with the money they have or not, while the poor don't have that power.
Yeah, very complex reason. And I think that even with these billionaires or trillionaires able to solve the world's hunger and poverty, it just can't happen. While there are people who deals with poverty, there's also the money that flows within remaining on this problem and that's why they're stopping any possible solution that's being brought to raise awareness or deal with poverty or any problem that results with that. It's hard to make a solution when you're not committed on it and if you are but the major motivator is money.
What is happening in the world right now is like that, no matter how much people have money they will still look for it again for more, between greed and fear of running out, it all goes back to today's humans who never feel enough so don't expect them to let wealth possessed to overcome this, there are actually some of them that are the cause of poverty. 
Personally, solving the problem of the poor will be the best because they will never look down on you and they will bless and pray for you. The rich feels that the moment you have been paid for a service rendered to them, they owe you nothing and that is the end. A poor man will never forget and if he can sing your praises. A poor man needs more attention than a rich man because they are vulnerable, unlike the rich man that can get alternatives.
The rich have become rich because most of them are problem solvers. While being rich, the next level of having problems is likely about the management of their wealth which is easy IMHO.
While the poor, there are tons of problems that people are dealing with every day. It looks easy but it's not when the ratio of rich and poor isn't par at all.
We admit it or not, there are poorer than rich people, and problems that are being dealt with by most of them can't be tackled easily. Putting this on a serious note, I've been there and still trying to survive. Before helping the poor, I want to help myself first.
Another problem with that kind of question is that it makes it seem as if people can just decide to solve those problems and then it will simply happen, there are very powerful reasons why we have been unable to solve the problem of poverty all around the world and at all points in history, this tell us this problem is not one that can be solved by a single person and the will to do it, as it is a very complex problem and its magnitude also makes it almost impossible to dive into it with any confidence.While the poor, there are tons of problems that people are dealing with every day. It looks easy but it's not when the ratio of rich and poor isn't par at all.
We admit it or not, there are poorer than rich people, and problems that are being dealt with by most of them can't be tackled easily. Putting this on a serious note, I've been there and still trying to survive. Before helping the poor, I want to help myself first.
Solving the problem of the poor should be a good decision than trying to solve the problem of some rich people who already have money.
The poor are the people that keep suffering from a harsh government policies and the rich has nothing to do lose since they have businesses that keep giving them money employing people to work for them to earn more profits. The poor need aids to live a better lifestyle than depending on the wrong sources for money or jobs that will not help them to be financially stable.
Yes, I totally agree with you if you choose to help solve the problems of the poor. It's true that very few people will help him if it's the poor who get the problem, of course people will let it go, as you said the poor continue to suffer with government policies and that's true. I see that most poor people find it difficult to make money so they can't fulfill a decent life for them, very different from the rich who can easily run their business and there are some entrepreneurs who do not pay taxes so they can reduce state revenues. The poor are the people that keep suffering from a harsh government policies and the rich has nothing to do lose since they have businesses that keep giving them money employing people to work for them to earn more profits. The poor need aids to live a better lifestyle than depending on the wrong sources for money or jobs that will not help them to be financially stable.
Solving the problem of the poor should be a good decision than trying to solve the problem of some rich people who already have money.
The poor are the people that keep suffering from a harsh government policies and the rich has nothing to do lose since they have businesses that keep giving them money employing people to work for them to earn more profits. The poor need aids to live a better lifestyle than depending on the wrong sources for money or jobs that will not help them to be financially stable.
Playing the devil's advocate, what if solving the problem of the rich benefits the poor? As the problem is not specified and explained by OP, let's assume that it is a big financial problem. More often than not, financial problems of the rich lead to companies closing which then leads to workers losing their jobs, creating bigger problems for the poor. Hence, solving this specific problem of the rich helps and maintain a good place for the poor. The poor are the people that keep suffering from a harsh government policies and the rich has nothing to do lose since they have businesses that keep giving them money employing people to work for them to earn more profits. The poor need aids to live a better lifestyle than depending on the wrong sources for money or jobs that will not help them to be financially stable.
The word "Problem" is broad and can mean different thing to different persons at a given period, just as it could mean financial for those in needs, health challenge for the sick and emotional needs for those in need of advice. But on the contrary, if i'm to be in such a position to help, i will go for the poor, simply because they have no one to help them, and by doing so will really mean alot to the poor.
Yes, you are absolutely right, I also feel that the context of the sentence "problem" is still too general and does not have a specific purpose or a specific meaning. In fact, both rich people and poor people of course still need someone's help. But I think the percentage level of poor people is certainly far more in need of help than rich people because of their "powerlessness".Rich people certainly have the perception that it will be more effective and efficient to use the services of experts to solve a problem they are facing, in contrast to the poor who do not have the capacity to use the services of experts to deal with the problems they are experiencing.
In my opinion, helping the poor people may indeed feel more meaningful when it comes to their "powerlessness" problem. But it won't be easy and probably won't fully help them completely if we also don't have the capacity to help them with their "problems".
Solving the problem of the poor should be a good decision than trying to solve the problem of some rich people who already have money.
The poor are the people that keep suffering from a harsh government policies and the rich has nothing to do lose since they have businesses that keep giving them money employing people to work for them to earn more profits. The poor need aids to live a better lifestyle than depending on the wrong sources for money or jobs that will not help them to be financially stable.
The poor are the people that keep suffering from a harsh government policies and the rich has nothing to do lose since they have businesses that keep giving them money employing people to work for them to earn more profits. The poor need aids to live a better lifestyle than depending on the wrong sources for money or jobs that will not help them to be financially stable.
I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)
Solving the problem of the rich individual means you'll get profits quickly as the rich will be willing to pay big for their problem to be solevd. One problem of the rich is security because they alway feel insecure therefore if you start up a personal security agency you can charge them big. The poor individuals mightn't have big money to pay you but you can use the advantage of their numbers therefore if you get millions of poor people to use the service you're offering, you'll get rich.
But there's much of an economic benefits to the state when an individual direct his services to helping the poor. It reduces the financial burden of social welfare on government in catering for those poor and less privileged when private individuals intervenes in giving them help by solving a few of their needs.
To be honest, I genuinely feel happy solving or even helping solve the problem of the poor than rich people. Rich people have their funds, resources and assets to solve any issues and hardships. They could pay for people to fix their problems while poor people mostly rely on the government and people who are able to lend them a hand. Poor people need help but the government only provide a temporary assistance. They deserve a long term help to survive and live life not just a temporary food on the table.
Both need help but rich people are more able to solve their without getting help from anyone.
Sarcastically speaking, the funny thing is that the problem of the poor is not always a big problem to solve , very minimal that with little funds solution will be made available unlike to the rich (big-man big-problem) their problems are not usually money related problems, and that's what makes the solutions to most of their problems difficult to meet.
Are you pertaining about lovelife? health? relationship problems? Cant able to have a child?. These are personal things but we know that everything in life cant really be balance. Yes, you do have the money but you cant
have everything but the good thing on being rich is that you are really that able to solve out problems as long you do have the money since there's something you could really be able to make use of. Unlike when you are poor then the first priority you do have in mind is on how to make your life way more better in terms of money and finances. Therefore, if i were to choose on which one i would really be taking into in speaking about
problems in between then i would go for the poor ones, usually this would be speaking about changing their lives in terms of finances and those kind of development which it isnt really just that much hard
and would really be happy on helping someone on whose really in need or some sort of help i would say.
I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)
I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.
I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.
If life was to be fair to people and I have a way to turn things around, I will make sure individual never suffer to make a living, my decision and willingness to help will not stop the riches from amassing their wealth but I will make sure the poor breathe and have access to good health, well fed with good food and basic amenities, this will be a standard practice for the world until we have a new place called another world but I will make sure the world eradicate poverty free where poverty will be a discussion of the past like the way we had slavery in the 70s and 80s.
I will also change the financial system of the government, that thing is not working, only favour the people around in power and such financial system is nothing but garbage, the inflation they created is killing an average person with low purchasing power of their fiats., I will kill that idea and make sure to have a standard currency that will be generally accept as world reserve currency, this is going to be my change to the world if and if the opportunity is available.
I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)
I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.
The word "Problem" is broad and can mean different thing to different persons at a given period, just as it could mean financial for those in needs, health challenge for the sick and emotional needs for those in need of advice. But on the contrary, if i'm to be in such a position to help, i will go for the poor, simply because they have no one to help them, and by doing so will really mean alot to the poor.
Jump to: