Which problem will you choose to solve? - page 9.

Lida93

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 529

Quote from: Cling18 on August 23, 2023, 03:39:09 PM

Quote from: Lida93 on August 23, 2023, 03:27:02 PM

Quote from: irhact on August 22, 2023, 03:01:07 PM

Quote from: Queentoshi on August 22, 2023, 10:49:38 AM

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

Solving the problem of the rich individual means you'll get profits quickly as the rich will be willing to pay big for their problem to be solevd. One problem of the rich is security because they alway feel insecure therefore if you start up a personal security agency you can charge them big. The poor individuals mightn't have big money to pay you but you can use the advantage of their numbers therefore if you get millions of poor people to use the service you're offering, you'll get rich.

A greater number of people are more likely to solve the problem of the rich compared to those ready and willing to solve the problems of the poor. Thy are solving the problem of the rich because of the reward that comes with it, the motive of the help is reward believing that the reward can come in form of money, promotion, favour etc.

But there's much of an economic benefits to the state when an individual direct his services to helping the poor. It reduces the financial burden of social welfare on government in catering for those poor and less privileged when private individuals intervenes in giving them help by solving a few of their needs.

To be honest, I genuinely feel happy solving or even helping solve the problem of the poor than rich people. Rich people have their funds, resources and assets to solve any issues and hardships. They could pay for people to fix their problems while poor people mostly rely on the government and people who are able to lend them a hand. Poor people need help but the government only provide a temporary assistance. They deserve a long term help to survive and live life not just a temporary food on the table.
Both need help but rich people are more able to solve their without getting help from anyone.

The underlying aspect of this is that the rich has a multi choice from where to source for solutions to his problem using his money but the poor is with no choice from where his solution can come from and that's what makes it of a necessity to give help more to the poor when we are faced with the opportunity. The rich can help themself but the poor can because he doesn't have the wherewithall to do so.
Sarcastically speaking, the funny thing is that the problem of the poor is not always a big problem to solve , very minimal that with little funds solution will be made available unlike to the rich (big-man big-problem) their problems are not usually money related problems, and that's what makes the solutions to most of their problems difficult to meet.

Raflesia

hero member

Activity: 2282

Merit: 560

_""""Duelbits""""_

Quote from: Majestic-milf on August 23, 2023, 03:47:40 PM

It's quite easy to solve the problem of the poor than the rich. At least when you create jobs or provide a means of putting food on their table, paying bills and being somewhat independent, you have helped greatly in affecting their lives. But for the rich? You'd have to take care of so many things; and where will you want to start from?
Even though the poor can help solve some of the problems of the rich in some areas like; Cook, chauffeur,gardener and the so many services they can render, there's still a yawning gap between them.

But this condition will not be easy to realise.
The current condition is too troubled by various kinds of doubts about the poor because maybe this kind of thing is not found in other countries but in the country where I live, jobs are also seen from qualifications and strata whether they are in the caste of rich, middle or poor people by measuring the standard of education and experience they have.

Most poor people will most likely only be able to work in jobs that are not even that decent in terms of salary because of the qualification issue itself which makes it like a differentiator where rich people who already have a plus in terms of education will get a more decent job than poor people who sometimes won't even get the same opportunity because they are not sure whether they are capable or not because they don't qualify.

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1131

Quote from: blockman on August 22, 2023, 11:08:33 AM

The rich have become rich because most of them are problem solvers. While being rich, the next level of having problems is likely about the management of their wealth which is easy IMHO.
While the poor, there are tons of problems that people are dealing with every day. It looks easy but it's not when the ratio of rich and poor isn't par at all.
We admit it or not, there are poorer than rich people, and problems that are being dealt with by most of them can't be tackled easily. Putting this on a serious note, I've been there and still trying to survive. Before helping the poor, I want to help myself first.

Totally easy specially if you do have the money which you could really be able to move on and do all sorts of things which we do know that in every step we do make it does really involved money and solving out issues or
problems with those rich people then it would be definitely be pertaining into those wealth handling or business problems which it would really be that not as heavy with those poor peoples problems on which it would really be pertaining about on how make themselves rich and this would be particularly finding ways on how to make themselves to be one and this would really be a challenged if you are really that offering the service.
Well when it comes on being ethical then people might be sticking into that poor problems which they would really be tending to help out to those who are really that in need but for sure this wont really be an
easy thing to deal with.

Majestic-milf

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 589

It's quite easy to solve the problem of the poor than the rich. At least when you create jobs or provide a means of putting food on their table, paying bills and being somewhat independent, you have helped greatly in affecting their lives. But for the rich? You'd have to take care of so many things; and where will you want to start from?
Even though the poor can help solve some of the problems of the rich in some areas like; Cook, chauffeur,gardener and the so many services they can render, there's still a yawning gap between them.

Unbunplease

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1159

The poor often have a chance to become rich and the rich often have a chance to become poor. The poor evoke feelings of compassion and the rich evoke feelings of envy and contempt. So - if you consider the issues of karma - the rich have more problems because many people curse them. And it is very difficult, being rich, to remain a man with a capital letter. A poor man has more chance of becoming rich than a rich man who has become poor

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: blockman on August 22, 2023, 11:08:33 AM

The rich have become rich because most of them are problem solvers. While being rich, the next level of having problems is likely about the management of their wealth which is easy IMHO.
While the poor, there are tons of problems that people are dealing with every day. It looks easy but it's not when the ratio of rich and poor isn't par at all.
We admit it or not, there are poorer than rich people, and problems that are being dealt with by most of them can't be tackled easily. Putting this on a serious note, I've been there and still trying to survive. Before helping the poor, I want to help myself first.

Another problem with that kind of question is that it makes it seem as if people can just decide to solve those problems and then it will simply happen, there are very powerful reasons why we have been unable to solve the problem of poverty all around the world and at all points in history, this tell us this problem is not one that can be solved by a single person and the will to do it, as it is a very complex problem and its magnitude also makes it almost impossible to dive into it with any confidence.

Cling18

full member

Activity: 1708

Merit: 126

Quote from: Lida93 on August 23, 2023, 03:27:02 PM

Quote from: irhact on August 22, 2023, 03:01:07 PM

Quote from: Queentoshi on August 22, 2023, 10:49:38 AM

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

Solving the problem of the rich individual means you'll get profits quickly as the rich will be willing to pay big for their problem to be solevd. One problem of the rich is security because they alway feel insecure therefore if you start up a personal security agency you can charge them big. The poor individuals mightn't have big money to pay you but you can use the advantage of their numbers therefore if you get millions of poor people to use the service you're offering, you'll get rich.

A greater number of people are more likely to solve the problem of the rich compared to those ready and willing to solve the problems of the poor. Thy are solving the problem of the rich because of the reward that comes with it, the motive of the help is reward believing that the reward can come in form of money, promotion, favour etc.

But there's much of an economic benefits to the state when an individual direct his services to helping the poor. It reduces the financial burden of social welfare on government in catering for those poor and less privileged when private individuals intervenes in giving them help by solving a few of their needs.

To be honest, I genuinely feel happy solving or even helping solve the problem of the poor than rich people. Rich people have their funds, resources and assets to solve any issues and hardships. They could pay for people to fix their problems while poor people mostly rely on the government and people who are able to lend them a hand. Poor people need help but the government only provide a temporary assistance. They deserve a long term help to survive and live life not just a temporary food on the table.
Both need help but rich people are more able to solve their without getting help from anyone.

Aanuoluwatofunmi

sr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 390

Maybe we should say it this way that both the rich and the poor do have problems, when the rich gets a problem, they have higher chances of getting it solved because they have money to an extent to push the problem to being solved, while when the poor has a problem, they lack money as a financial aid to get most of their challenges solved, which means it's better to use the opportunity in solving what money can first solve with the poor ones then the rich get other priority.

Lida93

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 529

Quote from: irhact on August 22, 2023, 03:01:07 PM

Quote from: Queentoshi on August 22, 2023, 10:49:38 AM

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

Solving the problem of the rich individual means you'll get profits quickly as the rich will be willing to pay big for their problem to be solevd. One problem of the rich is security because they alway feel insecure therefore if you start up a personal security agency you can charge them big. The poor individuals mightn't have big money to pay you but you can use the advantage of their numbers therefore if you get millions of poor people to use the service you're offering, you'll get rich.

A greater number of people are more likely to solve the problem of the rich compared to those ready and willing to solve the problems of the poor. Thy are solving the problem of the rich because of the reward that comes with it, the motive of the help is reward believing that the reward can come in form of money, promotion, favour etc.

But there's much of an economic benefits to the state when an individual direct his services to helping the poor. It reduces the financial burden of social welfare on government in catering for those poor and less privileged when private individuals intervenes in giving them help by solving a few of their needs.

JunaidAzizi

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 146

Play Bitcoin PVP Prediction Game

Quote from: Queentoshi on August 22, 2023, 10:49:38 AM

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.

Both Rich and poor people have problems and ethically we need to solve them for both but if I have to choose one I will solve the problem of poor people. There is reason behind it. If a rich person has a problem then he has at least the resources to fix it like the use of money, its references and its power, etc. But on the other side, If a poor person has a problem he does not have enough resources to solve it and in my view, this is the need of humanity to help the poor. The poor people have not only food and shelter issues but have some serious problems that are directly related to society. The poor people have many issues like divorce and family conflict, They have many health issues and their children grew up in poverty and are not educated which may lead to street crimes. These are some problems that make society awful that directly affect the rich person also. No doubt problems are a problem and no matter who has it whether it's a rich person or poor but poor people need it more

MFahad

hero member

Activity: 2464

Merit: 644

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

Those problems which can be solved with money can be solved but there are lots of problems which are unable to solved even with huge money in hands. There are problems in life of everyone no matter he is rich or poor but problems comes.

In my opinion with wealthy people there are always a problem of health which cannot be always solved with money but in a case of poor people they have one most common problem which is money so most of their problems can be solved with the help of money.

I think solving a problem of rich people is more difficult as Compared to poor people because even with lots of money the wealthy people cannot solved their problems and it is reality that as more money comes more problems arises therefore poor people will be more satisfied than rich one

blockman

hero member

Activity: 2912

Merit: 627

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: RockBell on August 23, 2023, 04:59:55 AM

Quote from: blockman on August 22, 2023, 11:08:33 AM

The rich have become rich because most of them are problem solvers. While being rich, the next level of having problems is likely about the management of their wealth which is easy IMHO.
While the poor, there are tons of problems that people are dealing with every day. It looks easy but it's not when the ratio of rich and poor isn't par at all.
We admit it or not, there are poorer than rich people, and problems that are being dealt with by most of them can't be tackled easily. Putting this on a serious note, I've been there and still trying to survive. Before helping the poor, I want to help myself first.

That is what social entrepreneurs do, they look for a particular problem and invest a lot of ideas in it, take Elon, for instance, coming up with Tesla an electric car to not only help in reducing cars that use fuel but also to reduce emissions very smart move, just charge and drive, that is the logic I see rich people do they search for a problem and the solving the problem comes with a lot of money, there are still a lot of problems out there that needs a solution, look at the cell phone today it has reduced sending of letters and has made communication easy, we are benefiting from peoples solving a problem, surviving these days is not easy, but we just have to keep supporting one another.

That's true and they keep on coming. But those that are already on the top of the chain, they've got more opportunities and easier now to introduce any product or invention they create and that's how it's easy for them to solve more problems. While we don't like Elon pertaining to the crypto related matters but, can't deny that he's done a lot not just for his employees but also for the world. I just hope that he's really caring for it and profit is just the 2nd matter.

flyingcarpet

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 188

Quote from: Queentoshi on August 22, 2023, 10:49:38 AM

I came across this tweet, so the reference is the username. I thought it was a topic worth bringing up for discussion to see the choice that will be made by forum members. This topic is about solving problems as a service you render to make a living. Which of the problems will you prefer to solve as a service you render? the problems of the poor? or the problems of the rich? (support your choice with a reason)

I posted this here because it relates to choices we make concerning how we want our finance to be, if this is a wrong place and the topic fits better in "politics and society", I will be happy to move it there.

Both the rich and the poor have their own problems. If it will provide a benefit to the society when we solve a rich person's problem, I can prefer it. The factor that determines the choice I will make is about whether it will benefit the society or not.

But we have some social values. In general, efforts are made to solve the problems of the poor. Because the poor may not have enough opportunities to solve their own problems. If solving a poor person's problem will benefit society, I will.

As a preference, I would like to solve the problems of both parties, but I prefer the one that will provide the most social benefit.

Cryptomultiplier

full member

Activity: 770

Merit: 180

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

For me, solving the problem of the poor or the rich has to come with a catch.

To solve the problem of the poor could just be as simple as providing a good medium to educate them, as well as opening their eyes to new ways of doing things. The reward may come in form of verbal gratitude and if it's something they had to pay so little or next to nothing to get inorder to live better, as compared to other costly ones, you have simply won their hearts for a lifetime.

To solve the problem of the rich however, could be same scenario as I highlighted in my second stanza, but it might be rewarding more in terms of cash, favors, and appointments. Still, it may not be fulfilling as being an angel to someone poor and undeserving.

red4slash

sr. member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 423

Quote from: Blowon on August 23, 2023, 12:51:55 PM

what should be solved from the problem of rich people, they are capable enough in many ways, why should we help someone who is basically capable in financial terms. if it's poor people, even they only think about how to eat today or tomorrow, they don't think about how they will enjoy their life. I think it's more appropriate to help the poor first.

What you said is not wrong at all, but I was thinking about something like this. If we solve the problems of the rich first, will it be able to help the poor? Especially since they have the financial ability which is arguably one of the problems of the poor.
And if we help the poor first, it's not likely to help the rich much. Let's say we are in a situation that is closely related to financial problems here.

Now if in a situation like this then I would strongly consider that. I mean when they (the rich) when the problem is over can help for the poor, then I would do that first.

Blowon

hero member

Activity: 1932

Merit: 511

what should be solved from the problem of rich people, they are capable enough in many ways, why should we help someone who is basically capable in financial terms. if it's poor people, even they only think about how to eat today or tomorrow, they don't think about how they will enjoy their life. I think it's more appropriate to help the poor first.

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 785

Quote from: lionheart78 on August 22, 2023, 04:34:36 PM

I will choose to solve my own problem. Why bother solving other people's problems when we ourselves have problems? It is best to focus on personal growth and when all is perfectly done, that is the time to focus on other problem.

It is better to be self-sufficient than the person who solves other people's problems while depending on others to meet our needs.

Poor people have the capability, what missing from them is the opportunity, and this opportunity can only be given by the government who has the funds and the power to implement things. I will think of this thing when I become a government official because it hurt more when the help is half-baked.

Agree with this statement! why do we take care of others while our own finances have not been addressed, we even often have problems even this will not be separated from financial problems.
Make yourself prosperous if you are already established then help others to give what you can.

YES only the government can solve this problem about the rich and the poor we can't do enough while the government has the responsibility for it with the policies it makes, remember it's too complicated to be an official even if you are sick of the uneven distribution.

YOSHIE

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1759

As far as I know there are many things that must be resolved between the rich and the poor, the two elements of society have various things that must be resolved, whether the way of thinking, economic, social, life and so on.

If we talk about the gap here for problems that must be solved from an economic perspective, of course the first thing that must be solved is the rich.

It is adjusted to the facts below, as I have read.

Quote

The main key to efforts to overcome socio-economic disparities is to provide access for every community to take advantage of existing social facilities, as well as provide equal opportunities for all people to develop and improve their economy.

The bottom line: to achieve inequality in terms of the economy and overcome it, of course the government must participate and be responsible for the rich, so that it creates.

Quote

Social inequality does not only occur in the economic sector, but also in the fields of education, technology, health, and the quality of human resources.

By overcoming the rich, automatically the poor will have a positive impact in solving the problems that exist in the lives of the economically rich.

bayu7adi

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 538

paper money is going away

Fascinatingly, both the wealthy and the less fortunate do grapple with their own sets of challenges. And whoever possesses solutions for their predicaments is essentially engaged in a business endeavor.

Alright, it's a conviction that most would prefer dealing with the affluent, as they tend to yield greater benefits in terms of financial gain. The work becomes streamlined, yet the income skyrockets. At first glance, I'd even buy into this illusion as a business objective.

However, after some time, I revert to contemplating that the wealthy don't always bring advantages to the world. Some are mirrors of greed and hubris. Associating with them doesn't necessarily illuminate the true essence of friendship. It might sound a touch naive, but aiding the less fortunate in resolving their dilemmas could possess a more compelling allure.

Finding fulfillment in the struggle itself and becoming a benefactor to those in greater need holds more value than relentlessly chasing money to the grave.

Plaguedeath

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 557

In this world there's always a winner and loser, it means even you're want to solve a problem of poor people, there's always a new problem and you can't fix it. It's true there are many people can upgrade their level from poor to rich or poor to middle, but there are a lot people are still stay in poor. I'd choose to fix rich people problem because it's either require very high technical skill or something related with relationship.

Topic: Which problem will you choose to solve? - page 9. (Read 1373 times)