Topic: Which site you don't want to gamble in 2016? - page 3. (Read 6459 times)
It is very good idea.. But i hope people will post genuine opinion only, with proper reason. Unless it will be not fair..
It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Fortunejack is a trusted site and provably fair. Better than all the crap gambling site that use non provably fair here like bitcasino and the others. Every non provably fair site should be avoided and that is all. You do know that the creator of this thread have personal grudge to fortunejack that is why no wonder fortunejack got alot of votes
Don't talk crap without proof to blame other gambling sites just because they are your pay master.
Here is the proof that they were doing crap or cheating others https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12519764
They open accepted but you just posted to increase your post count so come with proof to blame others
Can't believe these kind of big sites like fortunejack also cheating people. May be I will not use there site to gamble again.
For me i will choose betcoin because the site is very slow and never had win on that site.
Also yobit because dont know how to play it and heard some issue that withdrawal is not working..
Also yobit because dont know how to play it and heard some issue that withdrawal is not working..
It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Fortunejack is a trusted site and provably fair. Better than all the crap gambling site that use non provably fair here like bitcasino and the others. Every non provably fair site should be avoided and that is all. You do know that the creator of this thread have personal grudge to fortunejack that is why no wonder fortunejack got alot of votes
Don't talk crap without proof to blame other gambling sites just because they are your pay master.
Here is the proof that they were doing crap or cheating others https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12519764
They open accepted but you just posted to increase your post count so come with proof to blame others
I will also support for this statement. If one is accusing for all other sites than they must provide some kind of proofs not just writing few words. We have a clear proof that fortunejack was accepted his wrong doing in this past means they can do again any time same mistake if they see competition goes up.
It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Fortunejack is a trusted site and provably fair. Better than all the crap gambling site that use non provably fair here like bitcasino and the others. Every non provably fair site should be avoided and that is all. You do know that the creator of this thread have personal grudge to fortunejack that is why no wonder fortunejack got alot of votes
Don't talk crap without proof to blame other gambling sites just because they are your pay master.
Here is the proof that they were doing crap or cheating others https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12519764
They open accepted but you just posted to increase your post count so come with proof to blame others
Betcoin, always betcoin. They have been good to me 
You probably have read the poll question wrongly. It is asking for the site you don't want to gamble. Also, OP, why is the choice betcoin.tm being just text while all the other options are hyperlinks?
I think OP just forgot to put a "https://" in front of the link, that's why it doesn't show up as a link.
It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Fortunejack is a trusted site and provably fair. Better than all the crap gambling site that use non provably fair here like bitcasino and the others. Every non provably fair site should be avoided and that is all. You do know that the creator of this thread have personal grudge to fortunejack that is why no wonder fortunejack got alot of votes
FortuneJack can possibly be a scam, as it has many open accusatons against it. While nothing has been proven yet, we can't be 100% sure that it is clean.
It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Fortunejack is a trusted site and provably fair. Better than all the crap gambling site that use non provably fair here like bitcasino and the others. Every non provably fair site should be avoided and that is all. You do know that the creator of this thread have personal grudge to fortunejack that is why no wonder fortunejack got alot of votes
Don't talk crap without proof to blame other gambling sites just because they are your pay master.
Here is the proof that they were doing crap or cheating others https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12519764
They open accepted but you just posted to increase your post count so come with proof to blame others
i dont wan to gamble on 999dice since there is ton and ton of rumour saying that it is a scam site and they even have some sort of prove for it. i may also skip some gambling site with not so gd support cuz some takes like 2 weeks to resolve an issue i encounter and that is really very irritating.
i dont want to gamble on 999dice lots of member said they scam
and yobit.net no interest to play at there but for trade not bad
and yobit.net no interest to play at there but for trade not bad
The question is which site you dont want to gamble?right?
well then i choose primedice.com , well its simply because
everytime i play on that site, i always loose.
i think i just dont have any luck on that site so ill try to avoid the site.
well then i choose primedice.com , well its simply because
everytime i play on that site, i always loose.
i think i just dont have any luck on that site so ill try to avoid the site.
I think u shouldn't. with the atmosphere here, do that will make them suffer unnecessary bad reputation just because of your own problem.
I just answer the question in the title of the thread.
And this is my own experience. So why are you telling me that i shouldn't?
I have my own opinion,besides people have their own choice.
Its clear that I said that " i think i just dont have any luck on that site" .
Is there a way to see the voting results without casting a vote?
I did not tried every site or had any problems with any of those I playing in, so it's not fair that I would have to cast a random vote just to see the results.
I did not tried every site or had any problems with any of those I playing in, so it's not fair that I would have to cast a random vote just to see the results.
It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Fortunejack is a trusted site and provably fair. Better than all the crap gambling site that use non provably fair here like bitcasino and the others. Every non provably fair site should be avoided and that is all. You do know that the creator of this thread have personal grudge to fortunejack that is why no wonder fortunejack got alot of votes
Betcoin, always betcoin. They have been good to me
You probably have read the poll question wrongly. It is asking for the site you don't want to gamble. Also, OP, why is the choice betcoin.tm being just text while all the other options are hyperlinks?
I do not see https://bitcasino.io/ there, they are one of the finest Casino's out there at the moment... They just gave out 40 BTC of prizes in the Xmas raffle and I won
100mBTC of that... I like that you can play all the games on one site. I used some of the sites above, and the closest I could find to this site was PrimeDice. Only bad things I
heard was from 999Dice. We need more polls like these, but the facts must be straight, if you list a site as being bad.
100mBTC of that... I like that you can play all the games on one site. I used some of the sites above, and the closest I could find to this site was PrimeDice. Only bad things I
heard was from 999Dice. We need more polls like these, but the facts must be straight, if you list a site as being bad.
hahahah very nice topic u started here...
good for people like me to get started and not get into sad websites in 2016. will wait for more votes and reviews.
good for people like me to get started and not get into sad websites in 2016. will wait for more votes and reviews.
the top of the list is fortunejack? wow, never imagine it can be that bad.
its not bad at all(based on my experience) its just that op had a bad experience with the site that's why its on the top of the list. also it doesn't have the highest votes.
I have played some dice on FJ some months ago, and my experience was not bad as well. But then NLNico pointed out that FJ had been faking stats and I think it made them look pretty bad. Anyway, my vote goes to 999dice.
never heard that it has been reported fortunejack was faking stats. any source? i am quite interested to read about that. that's really a dishonest move.
May be you can read https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12501257 and the posts in the following few pages.
TL;DR: FJ said the number is correct, and later said the number is wrong because of a bug. NLNico believed it was a deliberate lie.
thanks for the reference. that 14 million bitcoins was really big
i am starting to believe op that fj was really dishonest.It looks like fortunejack was never a trusted site. No wonder why it is on top three spot to avoid gambling site in 2016.
Betcoin, always betcoin. They have been good to me
the top of the list is fortunejack? wow, never imagine it can be that bad.
its not bad at all(based on my experience) its just that op had a bad experience with the site that's why its on the top of the list. also it doesn't have the highest votes.
I have played some dice on FJ some months ago, and my experience was not bad as well. But then NLNico pointed out that FJ had been faking stats and I think it made them look pretty bad. Anyway, my vote goes to 999dice.
never heard that it has been reported fortunejack was faking stats. any source? i am quite interested to read about that. that's really a dishonest move.
May be you can read https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12501257 and the posts in the following few pages.
TL;DR: FJ said the number is correct, and later said the number is wrong because of a bug. NLNico believed it was a deliberate lie.
thanks for the reference. that 14 million bitcoins was really big
i am starting to believe op that fj was really dishonest. the top of the list is fortunejack? wow, never imagine it can be that bad.
its not bad at all(based on my experience) its just that op had a bad experience with the site that's why its on the top of the list. also it doesn't have the highest votes.
I have played some dice on FJ some months ago, and my experience was not bad as well. But then NLNico pointed out that FJ had been faking stats and I think it made them look pretty bad. Anyway, my vote goes to 999dice.
never heard that it has been reported fortunejack was faking stats. any source? i am quite interested to read about that. that's really a dishonest move.
May be you can read https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12501257 and the posts in the following few pages.
TL;DR: FJ said the number is correct, and later said the number is wrong because of a bug. NLNico believed it was a deliberate lie.
I think we can't just blame OP because not only this OP got the problem with FJ. If you look at the poll results FJ is in top 3 spot so there are many people not happy with FJ.
I think nothing wrong in that because he has just shared his opinion. He thinks that he don't have luck with that site so he don't want to play and he didn't ask either you or others not to play. Gambling itself is full of luck and if one think don't have luck there means just avoid it.
He just shared his experience with the site and he never said any thing bad about the site. We all can express what ever we feel is correct for our self.
I think lazy ppl would just read the title, look straight up the poll, maybe give a quick look through couple of comments and consider all those listed are scam. this poll look like a black list already.
It looks like you're the most lazy guy in this thread. OP just asking which site you don't like to gamble, reason may be any thing. No need to react so much but try to read the thread full details first.
Those numbers and tables you are trying to bring up are wrong and has nothing to do with our database, and there is no way you could have access to that kind of information.
However, we approve there was a bug counting it. One of the games (fortune wheel) was excluded from the trigger for a short period of time (when we changed our currency rates provider) and the bets were summed up without multiplying it on an exchange rate. The issue was fixed later, but the wager forgetfully remained untouched. It took some time to analyse the code and history of FortuneJack updates.
We think exaggerating total wager would be a cheap marketing trick and would never distribute wager that high on the landing page on purpose, knowing it would raise a lot of questions in a highly curious community like Bitcointalk.
FortuneJack has accepted his wrong doing only after arguing with members so may be lot of people don't trust them any more.
Here is the actual post link - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12519764
the top of the list is fortunejack? wow, never imagine it can be that bad.
its not bad at all(based on my experience) its just that op had a bad experience with the site that's why its on the top of the list. also it doesn't have the highest votes.
I have played some dice on FJ some months ago, and my experience was not bad as well. But then NLNico pointed out that FJ had been faking stats and I think it made them look pretty bad. Anyway, my vote goes to 999dice.
never heard that it has been reported fortunejack was faking stats. any source? i am quite interested to read about that. that's really a dishonest move.
May be you can read https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12501257 and the posts in the following few pages.
TL;DR: FJ said the number is correct, and later said the number is wrong because of a bug. NLNico believed it was a deliberate lie.
Jump to: