Pages:
Author

Topic: Which site you don't want to gamble in 2016? - page 8. (Read 6459 times)

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1593
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
December 30, 2015, 10:37:22 AM
#32
Well i will probably never bet in satoshi mines again because i think it's not completely fair site as when i try to play their with there practice wallet i usually find all the coins without hitting mine even once but when i deposit after 2 or 3 games when i hit next i get the mine on the first try..i know they provide secret hash and everything but no one has time to check that everytime we play so i guess it records users pattern and know that where user is going to hit on the first try..Everyone has different opinions about this site and i am not saying it's a Scam but i think it's not a completely fair site so i would not bet there anymore Smiley
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
December 30, 2015, 10:32:48 AM
#31
I thought fortunejack is a trustable site but it looks like more and more people hate this site to play. Now it is the leading site to avoid to play in 2016.
legendary
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
December 30, 2015, 10:14:14 AM
#30
I dont see battlecoin on the list but i dont think its needed as you are saying what sites to avoid are you?

I'd like to see more skill game gambling sites like battlecoin in 2016 please Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
December 30, 2015, 10:10:49 AM
#29
I am still interested in primedice. in primedice I like really king. I very much appreciated by the many exciting features and promos.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 500
December 30, 2015, 09:47:03 AM
#28
I stay miles away from satoshidice, because theyr support is like a ghost!
Lost my personal address to back on my profile account, and also having all data needed to recovery, the support never answer to my mail....account still locked and money still freezed inside...hope at least to find some satoshi on investment if i get back on it someday!
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
December 30, 2015, 09:42:49 AM
#27
well in my opinion there are all pretty decent websites to gamble in and its possible to win on all of it, if i had to choose where TO gamble i would bo with betcoin.tm and if i had to choose where NOT TO gamble, it would be 999dice in my opinion
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
December 30, 2015, 09:32:03 AM
#26
no 999 for me.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
December 30, 2015, 09:20:21 AM
#25
this force to vote is not nice, i also don't like FJ very much, cause they promoted players wagered over 10 million btc there, and after one guy found the trick, they changed it to the "real" number- still over 600k btc wagered, i doubt it.

the other one is 999dice, which is a scam, voted for it.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1023
December 30, 2015, 09:19:05 AM
#24
Please, add betcoin.tm. I don't see it on the list Smiley


Anyway, I've voted for yobit.net.

Just added into the list.

Why do you have FortuneJack labeled as scammers? Because of that message?

Not for that reason but they didn't pay me my signature campaign amount and also he didn't follow his own rules to choose the members correctly.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 503
December 30, 2015, 07:38:30 AM
#23
It's hard to say this, because I once joined in the sig campaign of this site. But i wont play in Yobit next year, because i never got a profit from it
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
December 30, 2015, 07:34:14 AM
#22
That's a different question xD
To be honest it's quite hard for me to answer because for now I did not had any bad experienced with any gambling sites I tested, but I did not used all of them in that list, so I will keep an eye to see any possible negative feedback from the users in this forum with some of the sites in that list.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
December 30, 2015, 07:32:00 AM
#21
I wouldnt recommend Yobit and 999... way to shady.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 100
December 30, 2015, 07:24:59 AM
#20
Ahah, good idea, much more fair. But as you can only select one and there are lots of site it's gonna be hard to see a trend ^^

And for me it would definitely be betcoin (didn't see it upthere), lost too much here already!
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 500
December 30, 2015, 07:26:15 AM
#20
If I could choose I would choose the second site 999dice.com and yobit even though I know all the sites have the same risk
because this choice so I chose two sites
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1196
Reputation first.
December 30, 2015, 07:18:33 AM
#19
Please, add betcoin.tm. I don't see it on the list Smiley


Anyway, I've voted for yobit.net.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
December 30, 2015, 07:16:27 AM
#18
I'm not going to name sites that I won't be gambling on. It's not very fair on site owners to trash talk their business unless the site has been proven 100% to be a scam. In that case trash talk away.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
www.pumpmycoin.com
December 30, 2015, 07:15:06 AM
#17
have to create the view that in the future year remained the most popular and interesting gambling sites, so nothing to distract from the game!, though
to create the illusion to replace and complement the live roulette and poker on an electronic form , to favorite hobby was always at hand, and thus filling the vigor and the entire year the accompanying luck!
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1008
December 30, 2015, 07:08:33 AM
#16
I chose not to gamble on 999dice in because some cases said they scam I'm just getting some bitcoin from there because I still have a referral acitve
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 3098
December 30, 2015, 06:54:41 AM
#15
i choose yobit on what site i wont visit to gamble again coz their dice have the highest house edge in the business and their support doesnt reply to any ticket i sent to them in the past, i hope its only on me and not on all of their users

I think you are after losing money fast, most of all people feels betrayed, and explain like  "highest house edge". I know that feeling.
all listed sites have their big losers, and receive vote
Pages:
Jump to: