Pages:
Author

Topic: White House Petition to AMEND IRS NOTICE 2014-2 Taxing virtual currency/Bitcoin - page 2. (Read 4388 times)

hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 504
I find it interesting that Bitcoin could even be considered property and not a currency. It has all the qualities of a currency.

If the IRS considered it currency, your gains would be considered regular income, as is the case with a foreign currency.   By treating it as property, you get a preferential tax treatment for long term gains.



This is true.

Imagine you mine 1 XBT when the value is $500. The IRS expects you to report that as income on either your W-2 or 1099 depending on how you normally file your taxes.

Then you hold the coin for over a year and decide to sell the coin. The value of that XBT is double what it was when you mined it. You now have $1,000 value of which you paid taxes on $500. The IRS wants you to pay $500 in capital gains on the difference.

The long term capital gains tax rate is currently 20%. Regular income tax brackets are 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, and 39.6%. In this scenario you are likely going to pay less in taxes than you would if you paid regular income taxes on your sale amount. If you make more than $36,000 per year your regular income tax rate is greater than the long term rate on capital gains.

So what if you transfer your coins into your personal wallet on a day where the market has flash crashed? Will you be able to claim the daily value of that day for the purpose of determining your regular income tax liability?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I find it interesting that Bitcoin could even be considered property and not a currency. It has all the qualities of a currency.

The CPA I met with seemed to understand the guidance, and he agreed we need to show something, but I almost think he envisions it being revised at some point. At the end of the day I'm taking his advice, he's not done evaluating it yet, but we will set a strategy that applies the guidance in a way that makes sense for me and stick with it until told otherwise.

What should be understood is this method they have outlined where payouts are recorded as income, and equipment will sit as expenses due to life that doesn't justify depreciation, we will very likely end up with an operating loss. Go ahead and calculate 2014 out so far to see how it looks. Due to the steady decline in price the revenues recorded do not come close to covering the equipment costs made months ago. Stay with me, this has a purpose... The problem is if your "business" generates a loss for three out of five years the IRS will consider it a hobby, and at that point you need to pay taxes on all the income and can only claim expenses greater than some percentage of your gross income- I forget the number but it was high. Basically once the IRS sees your activity as a "hobby" you end up with the worst of both worlds; paying taxes without the ability to write off expenses. So much of the annual profitability depends on market forces, it's just so speculative that there really is no certainty of profit in mining, and if 2014 doesn't turn around most miners will be reporting a loss next year, do that too many times and then you need to actually prove to them it is a business and not a hobby. And if you come out the gate saying it's just a hobby then be prepared to pay out the ass without the ability to claim expenses. This is tricky stuff and the important thing is having a system that makes sense and can be explained, remembering what you do this year sets the precedent for how you handle accounting in the years to come.

I'll be cleaning up some spreadsheets and will report back if my CPA says anything new.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
I find it interesting that Bitcoin could even be considered property and not a currency. It has all the qualities of a currency.

If the IRS considered it currency, your gains would be considered regular income, as is the case with a foreign currency.   By treating it as property, you get a preferential tax treatment for long term gains.

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 257
miners had to pay it already, if they were not paying they can keep doing the same "crime", there is no difference now or before
full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100
I find it interesting that Bitcoin could even be considered property and not a currency. It has all the qualities of a currency.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1003
Who cares wtf the I.R.S. does.

Not a single Satoshi I own is traceable to me as a individual.
Anybody could own my BTC, there is no way for the I.R.S. to prove otherwise.

Bitcoin was designed in a way that you should all be able to safely ignore the I.R.S. on this issue.
In reality most of BTC value is attributed to that fact, silkroad is what gave BTC value, gambling sites also helped.

I dare you to do what you said if you live in U.S.

Unless your total btc holding is worth couple thousands USD.


I already have. Furthermore, I've stated as much on here for years that the IRS is never getting my cryptocoins - so they can even look at this forum for proof that I don't care what they say.

The IRS means nothing to me. They owe ME money, not the other way around.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
i laugh at the panicking people that have not fully understood the ruling or the method of tracking/auditing. nor spoke to a accountant about it, but they simply start a petition to change something they dont understand.
Well my problem is that my accountant actually said a lot of very reassuring things, except they appear to be directly contradicted by the IRS publication even though he's read it.  I don't really feel like getting audited.

I met with a CPA today and he seemed to advise we only record income on spent BTC. For example, I buy mining gear with BTC, so the act of exchanging BTC for dollars or a good that are "real" is when we will record as income. This means the non-exchanged BTC only has a cost basis at where it was mined. Some of his advice seemed to contradict the IRS Q&A publication, but when I pressed on those he made the point that if I'm holding and not exchanging that it doesn't need to be reported as there's no taxable event. What he was advising sounded a lot like what I was hoping for, or what I thought would make more sense, but I do know the official guidance seems to state things differently. We both agreed it seems silly to report income on a virtual thing that is highly speculative. I mean, if you get $90k in mining payouts but at the year end some big news makes BTC worthless or illegal then you would owe taxes on that income but never saw and dollars, services, or physical goods from purchases because it was never exchanged and ended up worthless. He did say their guidance seems unclear enough that we come up with a method and stick with it until/unless they clarify. Lastly, a bit of confusion how to report some of the expenses, but I need to send him my spreadsheets, more to come...

Your CPA is an idiot and so you are if you use him.

IRS ruling clearly indicates there are 2 possible ways of acquiring btc:

1) Mining:  a taxable event that will be in your gross income based on fair market value of the mined coins. There will be another taxable event when you sell those coins, thus fall into capital gain.
2) Buying: there willl be a taxable event when you sell btc.



Eat shit buddy, why exactly do you think you can call people "idiots"? How much different you must sound face to face, serious keyboard bully syndrome you've got on this thread. I've been usefully adding to these topics for several days, and I promised I would share back what my CPA advises. He's got 20+ years and this was at a glance his first impression. Seriously, in all seriousness go fuck yourself.


Edit: I'm looking through your post history and it seems you have developed a habit of calling people idiots on here. I can't find one post of yours that doesn't have an insulting tone. Hope you understand what happens next...
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 504
I can see the timing of the tax evaluation being challenged too.

The publication mentions that the coins will be evaluated as ordinary income at the time they are received. If your mined coins are never received then is there no taxable income?

The Bitcoin protocol defines the ownership of coins by the owner of the private key. When your coins are not in your wallet; they are not your coins... Gox being one example among many.

So when is a Bitcoin actually owned? If you follow the blockchain then there is a clear event that identifies ownership.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Bravo to you to fight for your own freedom. I wish you the best of luck. I'm not trolling.

Freedom is a ideal that may be out of reach, we should all try/hope for it anyhow.

I suspect the only way I will get any freedom is to leave on a self sustaining ocean house boat.
Solar panels, Desalination facilities, greenhouse, and etc. All too pricy for me at the moment.
Being mid ocean I could have all the salt/fish/seaweed(gross?) I could eat.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Then you will spend your coins... or you have problems understanding my post too?
Why would a person who is not me be in a huge hurry to spend his/her BTC?

I understand everything you type, You don't understand the real value of BTC outside of it's fiat conversion ratio.

I'm a direct descendent from those who settled this land, More than anything else my lifeforce yearns for true freedom. BTC is small step towards the freedom that I yearn for.
BTC has more value than anything I could ever hold in my hand or consume through my mouth.

Bravo to you to fight for your own freedom. I wish you the best of luck. I'm not trolling.

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
This user is currently ignored.
Some people just don't get it.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Clearly, I'm not announcing an attempt to evade taxes on a public forum.  ROFLMAO.
What taxes are you referring to?
I don't recall admitting any ownership of any BTC.

Where is the proof?
To the IRS, it is when you create a taxable event, exchange them for cash or good and services, in a way that is reported to the IRS.   For instance, like buying a house with a duffel-bag full of cash or bitcoin.

Quote
Clearly you lack the ability to read/comprehend basic English, I'm ignoring you.
That wins this debate for sure, congratulations.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Then you will spend your coins... or you have problems understanding my post too?
Why would a person who is not me be in a huge hurry to spend his/her BTC?

I understand everything you type, You don't understand the real value of BTC outside of it's fiat conversion ratio.

I'm a direct descendent from those who settled this land, More than anything else my lifeforce yearns for true freedom. BTC is small step towards the freedom that I yearn for.
BTC has more value than anything I could ever hold in my hand or consume through my mouth.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500

The risk of having coins stolen is on you. You acquire a property, you're deemed to carry risk of storing it.

What i can see is the fair market value will be challenged. I bet every miner will use a lower price than current exchange rate.

It is not just theft, I could for example discover when I compare my wallet keys against the blockchain that it was not I who mined those coins at all but someone else.

-MarkM-


Then you're not required to report any of that, the lucky person (LOL) now has tax liability.


The point is MarkM, filing tax is a volunteering work.

You will only have to explain to the IRS the source of the bitcoins that you spend.

If you bought it, then either capital gain or loss applies

If you mined it, then either capital gain or loss applies AND you DID report such mining income .
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
The risk of having coins stolen is on you. You acquire a property, you're deemed to carry risk of storing it.

What i can see is the fair market value will be challenged. I bet every miner will use a lower price than current exchange rate.

It is not just theft, I could for example discover when I compare my wallet keys against the blockchain that it was not I who mined those coins at all but someone else.

Until I actually go get those coins I do not know who my machine has really been mining for since last I checked it was really me it was mining for.

Maybe though it would be useful to have an "at time the block was solved" price of bitcoin chart somewhere, adjusted if the chain is re-arranged, so that the value of each block's minted coins can be determined?

-MarkM-
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Do you realize the report isnt from ppl who sold you coins right?

Its when you spend them or sell on exchanges. If you sell your coins locally, then the risk is carried over to the buyer.

I've never purchased bitcoins.
I've never wasted my time with a exchange.

Those of you who were/are day traders are the ones effected here.

Then you will spend your coins... or you have problems understanding my post too?
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500

IRS ruling clearly indicates there are 2 possible ways of acquiring btc:

1) Mining:  a taxable event that will be in your gross income based on fair market value of the mined coins. There will be another taxable event when you sell those coins, thus fall into capital gain.

That one sounds problematic. There are any number of reasons why the coins are not worth, in your mining machine that mined them, what any market happens to be offering for someone else's bitcoins already on that market at that time.

You might not even actually have any bitcoins by the time you actually go to move them off the mining machine to somewhere else, let alone by the time you actually get clearance at an exchange to exchange them.

So it seems unreasonable. Until you sell them you have no idea whether they are worth anything at all, they are a digital fiction that might someday turn out to be worth something but then again might not.

Same thing when you "farm" a magic sword or a pile of gold in World of Warcraft. Until you actually manage to sell them they are more a waste of time effort and money than any kind of gain, regardless of how many "exchanges" exist at which you hypothetically "could" sell them or exchange them.

-MarkM-


The risk of having coins stolen is on you. You acquire a property, you're deemed to carry risk of storing it.

What i can see is the fair market value will be challenged. I bet every miner will use a lower price than current exchange rate.

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Do you realize the report isnt from ppl who sold you coins right?

Its when you spend them or sell on exchanges. If you sell your coins locally, then the risk is carried over to the buyer.

I've never purchased bitcoins.
I've never wasted my time with a exchange.

Those of you who were/are day traders are the ones effected here.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Clearly, I'm not announcing an attempt to evade taxes on a public forum.  ROFLMAO.
What taxes are you referring to?
I don't recall admitting any ownership of any BTC.

Where is the proof?

Clearly you lack the ability to read/comprehend basic English, I'm ignoring you.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
The IRS sees you get some income via a report (required by law) via a third party.

None of my bitcoins came from parties knowing my name.
Clearly You're one of those sheep who purchased from Mt. Gox, ROFLMAO.

Do you realize the report isnt from ppl who sold you coins right?

Its when you spend them or sell on exchanges. If you sell your coins locally, then the risk is carried over to the buyer.
Pages:
Jump to: