Pages:
Author

Topic: Who else sold out? - page 4. (Read 6720 times)

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
September 04, 2011, 08:04:07 AM
#15
This is not a troll thread. I ask a simple question, if you start spewing crap about this being a troll thread then you are the troll. This is a legitimate question and I see no reason why it doesn't have a place on this forum.

How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?

I'm not holding and I've withdrawn my trading funds from the exchanges.

If ever I need bitcoins, I'll buy exactly what I need and spend it immediately.
hero member
Activity: 530
Merit: 500
September 04, 2011, 07:56:10 AM
#14
My goal from the start was to have a payment network, not a speculative investment asset

+1

Getting the get-rich speculators out of the spotlight is only good for Bitcoin at the moment. Less focus on whether it's a pyramid/ponzi and more focus on what it actually brings to the table.

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
165YUuQUWhBz3d27iXKxRiazQnjEtJNG9g
September 04, 2011, 07:47:49 AM
#13
How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?

I wouldn't say I've "lost faith", but I do believe the market is terribly overvalued based on fundamentals, so I keep almost all my money in USD instead of BTC.  My goal from the start was to have a payment network, not a speculative investment asset, so I can't say I'm torn up about it.  To those looking to get rich quick, good luck, but I wouldn't bet my net worth on it.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
September 04, 2011, 06:35:32 AM
#12
Bitcoin technology is so appealing and addicting I can't possibly imagine "loosing faith". In fact, it's not about "faith", it's about understanding the underlying technology and intrinsic advantages.

+1 As long as developers are still working on improving bitcoin, I see no reason to turn away.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
September 04, 2011, 06:29:15 AM
#11
Scalability concerns have been very well addressed here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability

Actually, after reading it I think scalability concerns are addressed very poorly there.

They propose all sorts of tactical ways to affect K in the "K*n2" formula, while tip-toeing around the strategic issue of n2.
The K is irrelevant, that's why we have the big-O notation.

It seems to me that so long as there is a single chain of all transactions, the system is not scalable, super-nodes or no super-nodes.
Because workload is not spread between super-nodes, but rather duplicated and in the end every (super)node has to process ALL transactions in the world...


Ok, I don't want to hijack the thread, sorry Smiley
I will shut up now.
qwk
donator
Activity: 3542
Merit: 3413
Shitcoin Minimalist
September 04, 2011, 06:26:06 AM
#10
How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?

I think, the latter sums it up quite well: "sold almost all of yours"

If you really lost faith in btc, why not sell all? Because you still believe that there might be more coming. And that is the opposite of losing faith.
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 101
September 04, 2011, 06:22:33 AM
#9
How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?

You can sell em?
aq
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
September 04, 2011, 06:20:47 AM
#8
I can't say I lost all faith, but I have a strong feeling that BitCoin is dying (not to spread FUD or anything)...

Quote
Shifting 60 gigabytes of data in, say, 60 seconds means an average rate of 1 gigabyte per second, or 8 gigabits per second.

So, Bitcoin could have scaling issues in a scenario unlikely to happen within a decade at least, assuming development is being halted today.
Well, that is spreading FUD.
hero member
Activity: 530
Merit: 500
September 04, 2011, 05:57:40 AM
#7
Quote
Shifting 60 gigabytes of data in, say, 60 seconds means an average rate of 1 gigabyte per second, or 8 gigabits per second.
Yeah, that's comforting...

No, but one proposed solution is:

Quote
Bandwidth
The network costs of distributing blocks can be minimized by changing the protocol to send blocks as a header plus a list of hashes. Because nodes are very likely to have already seen a transaction when it was first broadcast, this means the size of a block to download would be trivial (80 bytes + 32 bytes per transaction). If a node didn't see a transaction broadcast, it can ask the connected node to provide it.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
September 04, 2011, 05:41:41 AM
#6
Scalability concerns have been very well addressed here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability (AFAIK by google employee).
anything)...

Quote
Shifting 60 gigabytes of data in, say, 60 seconds means an average rate of 1 gigabyte per second, or 8 gigabits per second.

Yeah, that's comforting...
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
September 04, 2011, 05:18:59 AM
#5
Bitcoin technology is so appealing...
Yeah, this is where it's a problem for me. As I've posted here already, I have major concerns about scalability of BitCoin, so I don't find the technology so "appealing".
I find the idea appealing, but not the current implementation.

Scalability concerns have been very well addressed here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability (AFAIK by google employee).

I can't say I lost all faith, but I have a strong feeling that BitCoin is dying (not to spread FUD or anything)...

What really, fundamentally matters is the infrastructure (exchanges, merchant solutions, businesses accepting Bitcoins, ...). This area is stronger than ever. Just have a look how SilkRoad is flourishing Wink
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
September 04, 2011, 05:09:03 AM
#4
Bitcoin technology is so appealing...

Yeah, this is where it's a problem for me. As I've posted here already, I have major concerns about scalability of BitCoin, so I don't find the technology so "appealing".
I find the idea appealing, but not the current implementation.

I can't say I lost all faith, but I have a strong feeling that BitCoin is dying (not to spread FUD or anything)...

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
September 04, 2011, 05:05:28 AM
#3
This is not a troll thread. I ask a simple question, if you start spewing crap about this being a troll thread then you are the troll. This is a legitimate question and I see no reason why it doesn't have a place on this forum.

How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?

Bitcoin technology is so appealing and addicting I can't possibly imagine "loosing faith". In fact, it's not about "faith", it's about understanding the underlying technology and intrinsic advantages.

likewise. i'm selling quite a few at the moment (see market), but i'm as keen as ever on bitcoins. will be buying back in as soon as i can, even if that means doing it at a higher rate.
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
September 04, 2011, 05:02:51 AM
#2
This is not a troll thread. I ask a simple question, if you start spewing crap about this being a troll thread then you are the troll. This is a legitimate question and I see no reason why it doesn't have a place on this forum.

How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?

Bitcoin technology is so appealing and addicting I can't possibly imagine "loosing faith". In fact, it's not about "faith", it's about understanding the underlying technology and intrinsic advantages.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
September 04, 2011, 04:31:10 AM
#1
This is not a troll thread. I ask a simple question, if you start spewing crap about this being a troll thread then you are the troll. This is a legitimate question and I see no reason why it doesn't have a place on this forum.

How many of you guys have lost faith in Bitcoin and sold almost all of yours?
Pages:
Jump to: