Who have right and which is the best? - page 3.

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:49:10 AM

On the side of Truth and Justice? Is that what you mean, criminal? I can only hope so.

Again - calling me names - strange why you are attacking me - you don't know me and we've had zero business dealings - so why are you so angry at me?

Did I take your BTC?

(if you haven't worked it out yet I am eroding your non-reputation very fast so might be about time to start with a new account)

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:48:18 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:47:32 AM

And another sleazy, unsubstantiated accusation from an admitted [failed] blackmailer. Your sort just never gets rehabilitated Angry

And your replies just get nastier and nastier - do you think anyone is on your side?

On the side of Truth and Justice? Is that what you mean, criminal? I can only hope so.

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:47:32 AM

And another sleazy, unsubstantiated accusation from an admitted [failed] blackmailer. Your sort just never gets rehabilitated Angry

And your replies just get nastier and nastier - do you think anyone is on your side?

The fact that you keep up your personal attacks on me just shows that you are being paid to do so (why otherwise?).

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:45:05 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:42:24 AM

Regarding job satisfaction: While posting on this forum is your job, it is not mine. Outing blackmailing criminals such as yourself is easy and extremely satisfying.

Obviously posting on this forum *is your job* and so I laugh at you.

You are so pitiful that you can't even get a decent job doing something admirable but instead get paid to troll others (you don't even know).

And another sleazy, unsubstantiated defamatory lie from an admitted [failed] blackmailer. Your sort just never gets rehabilitated Angry

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:42:24 AM

Regarding job satisfaction: While posting on this forum is your job, it is not mine. Outing blackmailing criminals such as yourself is easy and extremely satisfying.

Obviously posting on this forum *is your job* and so I laugh at you.

You are so pitiful that you can't even get a decent job doing something admirable but instead get paid to troll others (you don't even know).

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:38:14 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:34:22 AM

Of course you are a criminal -- what else would you call blackmailing the forum into getting your way, threatening not to return the 50BTC entrusted to you?
Criminal of the lowest sort -- an extortionist!
Angry

The forum's funds were returned (the very next day) so your accusations are just plain rubbish.

Obviously you are a very hateful sort of person who is probably being paid to try and personally attack me.

I'd recommend you get a better job as you won't get any job satisfaction with this one. Cheesy

Your failed blackmail attempt only akes you a failed criminal, just like a failed bank robbery makes its perpetrator a failed criminal (as opposed to an honest person).
Regarding job satisfaction: While posting on this forum is your job, it is not mine. Outing blackmailing criminals such as yourself is easy and extremely satisfying.

What worries me is you still think you did nothing wrong, making your so-called apology yet another in your long chain of LIES! Angry

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:34:22 AM

Of course you are a criminal -- what else would you call blackmailing the forum into getting your way, threatening not to return the 50BTC entrusted to you?
Criminal of the lowest sort -- an extortionist!
Angry

The forum's funds were returned (the very next day) so your accusations are just plain rubbish.

Obviously you are a very hateful sort of person who is probably being paid to try and personally attack me.

I'd recommend you get a better job as you won't get any job satisfaction with this one. Cheesy

pereira4

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1183

Even if the disaster happens and some other team that isn't Core manages to hard fork and split the blockchain therefore rendering the existance of "2 Bitcoins", the coins in blockchain A would be in blockchain B so you would never lose your money, your wallet would be the same on both blockchains, so even in this disaster scenario you wouldn't lose your coins.

Of course, the best outcome is that Core team will and the other amateurs that are trying to jeopardize the Core team end up like XT and the rest of altcoins.

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:31:44 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:30:19 AM

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:29:00 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:27:03 AM

No man, he tries to make money by extorting it from the Bitcoin community, see here Cheesy

No forum money was lost (or therefore made by me) over that.

So another trolling stupid comment.

Not for your lack of trying, you lying criminal Angry

Oh - you are saying I am a criminal now?

You really should be more careful when you troll (everyone is seeing you make a very big fool of yourself).

Of course you are a criminal -- what else would you call blackmailing the forum into getting your way, threatening not to return the 50BTC entrusted to you?
Criminal of the lowest sort -- an extortionist!

cjmoles

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1017

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:24:35 AM

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 10:22:38 AM

Well, the 1st solution is to implement the Classic Fork. Check!
Step Two - throw party for return of a Development Team that isn't STUPID and operating on Conflict-Of-Interest.
Step 3 - allow the return of intelligent governance to do its thing.

The first thing is to ignore the advice of the poster of this nonsense.

Would trying to align Bitcoin with a faster more technologically superior platform like Ethereum be a viable solution? Or, would it be more prudent to hold off on increasing the block size and wait for R3CEV to finish it's research and use what they learn? I don't know....I'm just searching for consensus here.

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:30:19 AM

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:29:00 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:27:03 AM

No man, he tries to make money by extorting it from the Bitcoin community, see here Cheesy

No forum money was lost (or therefore made by me) over that.

So another trolling stupid comment.

Not for your lack of trying, you lying criminal Angry

Oh - you are saying I am a criminal now?

You really should be more careful when you troll (everyone is seeing you make a very big fool of yourself).

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:29:00 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:27:03 AM

No man, he tries to make money by extorting it from the Bitcoin community, see here Cheesy

No forum money was lost (or therefore made by me) over that.

So another trolling stupid comment.

Not for your lack of trying, you lying criminal Angry

Kprawn

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1074

CIYAM is 100% correct... The whole thing started with the exit of Gavin and Mike Hearn... they thought they could go on their own and a huge percentage of

the community would follow them like sheep. They clearly underestimated the intelligence of the community and the Bitcoin community stood up to them and

said NO to their XT proposal. Mike Hearn accepted the defeat and he ran after the money to work for the competition and Gavin came back with a new

proposal, which is a bit better on the ear for most people. It's all about the power.... very little has to do with the actual need for bigger block sizes. Yes, it has

to increase over time, but it was rushed and blown up to hasten a power grab, before the Core team could bring out their solution. {SegWit etc..}

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: blunderer on February 01, 2016, 10:27:03 AM

No man, he tries to make money by extorting it from the Bitcoin community, see here Cheesy

No forum money was lost (or therefore made by me) over that.

So another trolling stupid comment.

I am really not worried about your stupid personal attacks at me - it just shows how desperate Gavin is.

blunderer

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 10:19:45 AM

actually he's probably independently wealthy and does charity coding. As they say... you get what you pay for. Sort of like Blockstream.... people are paying for working code..... but what they get is angry Core/Blockstream shills wasting all their time in forum chats spreading FUD.

Go back to work CIYAM! Your code won't write itself!

No man, he tries to make money by extorting it from the Bitcoin community, see here Cheesy

Yup, this criminal would stop at nothing to get his way Angry

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 10:23:49 AM

No. I think I have you pegged pretty squarely as a FUD spreading Core/Blockstream supporter that is contributing to the problem.

You are entitled to think whatever you like - but I think that the FUD is "stronger with you".

(although I would not quite call you a FUD-Master yet - so you'd better keep on working at it)

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 10:22:38 AM

Well, the 1st solution is to implement the Classic Fork. Check!
Step Two - throw party for return of a Development Team that isn't STUPID and operating on Conflict-Of-Interest.
Step 3 - allow the return of intelligent governance to do its thing.

The first thing is to ignore the advice of the poster of this nonsense.

keepdoing

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 101

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:21:19 AM

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 10:19:45 AM

Go back to work CIYAM! Your code won't write itself!

It's interesting that all the trolls are trying to attack me (someone who doesn't work for any Bitcoin company and never has).

You are getting kind of desperate aren't you?

(shouldn't you be trolling the core devs instead of me?)

No. I think I have you pegged pretty squarely as a FUD spreading Core/Blockstream supporter that is contributing to the problem.

keepdoing

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 101

Quote from: cjmoles on February 01, 2016, 10:20:21 AM

Quote from: CIYAM on February 01, 2016, 10:06:18 AM

Quote from: cjmoles on February 01, 2016, 10:04:49 AM

We know that there are companies who are willing to concede some sort of regulation for a share in the US market....Who are they and what are they proposing in backroom negotiations?

You can't "regulate science" it works the way that it does (no amount of government agreements will make it quicker to verify ECDSA signatures).

So, I'm no scientist, are you saying that Bitcoin cannot handle a large increase in adoption because transaction times would be too slow? What are the solutions?

Well, the 1st solution is to implement the Classic Fork. Check!
Step Two - throw party for return of a Development Team that isn't STUPID and operating on Conflict-Of-Interest.
Step 3 - allow the return of intelligent governance to do its thing.

CIYAM

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1086

Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 10:19:45 AM

Go back to work CIYAM! Your code won't write itself!

It's interesting that all the trolls are trying to attack me (someone who doesn't work for any Bitcoin company and never has).

You are getting kind of desperate aren't you?

(shouldn't you be trolling the core devs instead of me?)

Topic: Who have right and which is the best? - page 3. (Read 2582 times)