~snip~
Why you are only taking Lauda's name? All the DT members takes action and gives out neg trust.
Just think twice or maybe thrice who gets neg trust for doing what types of activities.
You are questioning about default trust system and those who belong there and it is very much unacceptable. I think Theymos don't have much time to find & fight against the scammers/abusers daily, instead he created default trust system and added some trusted members there so that they can find & fight against the scammers/abusers. Do you think the task is easy?
All the rules which has been created by Theymos and or by DT members, are for all the member's good but not for an individual.
Just imagine for a minute, there is no DT members and no one is looking for any inappropriate activities. Can you imagine any good thing?
But I can imagine all the bad things... the forum will be dead for good members. Scammers will be the RULER of this forum for sure.
NO OFFENCE!
Thank you, you are the only one that try to explain your point of view and ask serious question.
Thekool1s is a stupid guy. He posted a picture and I stopped reading from that point.
theultralite bla bla bla bla make your own forum...who forced him to read my message?
Probably most of you don't fully understand what I mean because a few months ago I was like you. I Never had thought that I could be involved in this thread.
I am a legendary member tagged from Lauda that never had any discussion, never sell or bought account, never scam people.
Now I feel disgusted, I feel the sensation of something deeply unfair. I feel I have no way to defend myself because the only things you can do is write to DT1 members.
So I thought about asking to every bounty manager to put ~Lauda. It could be an alternative way of defend against Lauda.
I did a lot of research and asked to a lot of user tagged by Lauda.
I hate scammers and users that have multi accounts too, but here we are beyond the limit: a member tagged because Lauda hates bitcoincash, another member tagged for the intention to do something and not for something really proven.
If tomorrow Lauda decides to tag someone because she doesn't like the nickname, you don't really have a procedure to recover your trust status because "trust is not moderated"
Remember that Lauda isn't Mother Teresa or a charity organization. She told that she spent a lot of her time doing this for free but if you think how is important reputation I see a conflic of interest (I see an avatar selling something).
I asked to a lot of moderators about some case and all of them told me that they didn't tagged those people but they aren't surprise that Lauda did.
I discovered that Lauda was removed from staff member because she did an extortion/blackmail
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20Probably the exclusion from the staff member cause her to be angry with the entire world.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20This is the post where she is red tagging anyone that supports Bitcoin Cash.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/enough-is-enough-class-action-lawsuit-against-theymos-because-of-lauda-2420291And this is the incredible thread. I can't believe:Lauda, Sold bitcointalk accounts, Giving neg for others for same reason.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lauda-sold-bitcointalk-accounts-giving-neg-for-others-for-same-reason-2410318To be honest I think that 99% of people tagged by Lauda deserve that negative trust, the problem is if you are in that 1%.
I prefer an unpunished guilty rather than an innocent punishment and Lauda doesn't act in this direction.
My two cents.