Pages:
Author

Topic: Who is judging the judge? The Lauda problem. - page 2. (Read 1335 times)

hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 596
November 21, 2017, 05:11:37 AM
#10
~snip~

Why you are only taking Lauda's name? All the DT members takes action and gives out neg trust.
Just think twice or maybe thrice who gets neg trust for doing what types of activities.

You are questioning about default trust system and those who belong there and it is very much unacceptable. I think Theymos don't have much time to find & fight against the scammers/abusers daily, instead he created default trust system and added some trusted members there so that they can find & fight against the scammers/abusers. Do you think the task is easy?

All the rules which has been created by Theymos and or by DT members, are for all the member's good but not for an individual.

Just imagine for a minute, there is no DT members and no one is looking for any inappropriate activities. Can you imagine any good thing?
But I can imagine all the bad things... the forum will be dead for good members. Scammers will be the RULER of this forum for sure.

NO OFFENCE!
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
November 21, 2017, 02:49:51 AM
#9
I think we have a serious problem in the forum.
Lauda and other members put negative trust without any rules. They created their own rules.
No one asked you to join the forum. Go away. Simple solution and it will save a lot of other people from the trouble of reading your shitposts and garbage just to get an answer in the forum.

Quote
Sometimes they punish the intention. They don't have to report any proof.
The reference is not a proof.
I told you - go make your own forum and be the MVP king of that forum. Apply your own rules and watch how it unfolds.
Quote
They decided to apply  their own rules but they don't understand that the problem is the possibility to create multiple accounts.
Does that make any sense? Anyone can make an alt account here for any reason whatsoever. But if done for cheating campaigns and so on they should be negged - which I am sure happened to your original account.

Quote
Why Lauda doesn't ask theymos to link the account to an Id card or to a cellular phone number?
Oh come on now, this is a bitcoin forum not Paypal.
Quote
Lauda giving the neg trust, force you to create a new account.
Does not imply that. Neg trust would be a punishment for you.It is now your decision if you want to use that account or not. If you were a legit person you would swallow your pride and use that account itself. But since you are shitposter/bounty cheater your obvious decision is to make a new account.

Wait did I just reveal your real intention? Grin Grin

Quote
Why Lauda doesn't ask Theymos to lock the  "Invites & Accounts". (remember that buying accounts is legit)
It should be very happy but doing this he would not have his game anymore.
Selling account other than bitcointalk accounts are happening here. It seems you have not visited that section yet since you mostly watch those sections where posting gives you credit for your signature.


Quote
So I ask to all of you to do something against this problem.
I think that we can ask every day  in every thread for a bounty campaign to the bounty manager  to put ~Lauda in his default trust list ignoring Lauda trust.
On the other hand all legit bounty managers depend on DT2 members to neg tag cheaters.
Quote
Maybe we can create a Signature asking for ~Lauda in the default trust.
We could create every days tons of account (remember it's not against the rule) posting this message in every thread and reporting this problem to DT1 users.We have to do something, they put red trust to legit users without any rules, without anybody that told them to do, they punish the intention, this is witch-hunt.
Like I said go make your own forum and preach.

Quote
So the fact is:
There are no rules
You can buy and sell account
You can ask to everyone to ignore Lauda putting ~Lauda in the default trust list.
More shitposting

Quote
Remember that Lauda can't be judged by anyone and ignoring him is the only weapon we have.
Forum admins discuss potential issues with DT2 members if necessary. They are human after all.

If you were educated enough, you would stop shitposting and get a job and a life and leave the forum since you got negative trust. No use hanging around here. It will save the forum from ya shitposters.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1218
Change is in your hands
November 21, 2017, 02:22:26 AM
#8
Quote
I think we have a serious problem in the forum.
Lauda and other members put negative trust without any rules.



Quote
They created their own rules.

No! they haven't.

Quote
Sometimes they punish the intention.
What do you mean by this? so i have a intention to scam some people, I don't deserve the negative trust for that?

Quote
They don't have to report any proof.
They do! They always do!

Quote
The reference is not a proof.

Lol it is! What else do you need?

Quote
They decided to apply  their own rules but they don't understand that the problem is the possibility to create multiple accounts.
Creating multiple accounts isn't the problem, The Problem is something which you don't understand! Shitposting, Scamming etc.

Quote
Why Lauda doesn't ask theymos to link the account to an Id card or to a cellular phone number?
Again this isn't a corporate 9-5 job Wink

Quote
Lauda giving the neg trust, force you to create a new account.
Why don't fix your issues? instead of creating new accounts? like stop shitposting? etc  Roll Eyes

Quote
Why Lauda doesn't ask Theymos to lock the  "Invites & Accounts". (remember that buying accounts is legit)
Lol, it isn't for selling Bitcointalk.org accounts for the thousandth time!

Quote
So I ask to all of you to do something against this problem.
There isn't any problem to fix.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
November 20, 2017, 05:05:08 PM
#7
Continuing from the duplicate thread:

Quote
Is totally legit to buy or sell an bitcointalk account? (non hacked, not stolen)
Yes or No? (there is only YES or NO).
No.

Quote
How do you complete this sentence: Lauda is telling everyone that buying or selling bitcointalk accounts it perfectly and totaly rig...and within the forum rules.
Scamming is also within the rules. Should I also stop tagging people for that just because it is within the forum rules? Roll Eyes

Quote
How many are the DT1 members?
12 (inclunding theymos).

Quote
If the 51% of the forum users thought that you are wrong what is your advice? How can the majority remove you from your role. I don't think you are untochable, aren't you?
Let's create a democracy forum together!
That is absolute bullshit and you look like a clown just for recommending something like that. Easy rebuttal:
1. a) 51% of forum users is useless as a single user could outvote all the DT members by using hundreds of accounts.
    b) Votes from random account farmers, abusers, scammers or similar are useless.
2. This is a privately owned forum, not a democracy.
3. Of course I am touchable, otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation after I busted your army of accounts.

Quote
..he put also a negative trust to someone who didn't think the same in a discussion.
OP is a blatant liar. I do not do such thing.

Quote
He call idiots BCH users.
They are outright baboons, yes.

Quote
He is not controlled by DT1.
Of course I am. If requested by hilariousandco or Blazed, I'd have to remove a rating or two.

Quote
I am sure that they didn't consider any action against him.
It's quite simple: That's because I am right and they agree with me.

Anything else? Higher reasoning requires higher levels of education, which is not something often found with these random shitposters and farmers.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1317
Get your game girl
November 20, 2017, 02:23:11 PM
#6
People here think Signature campaigns or bounties are an privilege.I have had members abusing me for not updating the signature spreedsheet of the campaign I was managing as they wanted a quick confirmation if they're accepted.I don't know what to make of it but there certainly needs an authority to control this.


I get the same crap and it's ridiculous. I update the sheets in bounty campaigns once or twice a day. I have a life outside of that 1 campaign and refuse to update that sheet every single second. If you cannot wait for a response then do not join.
I remember the one time you made it public that you went out and got drunk made you the most irresponsible manager on the forum lol Like you had couple of accusations opened because you did not update the spreed-sheet or something and got drunk instead.You really must have a lot of patience to tolerate them man! ?
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
November 20, 2017, 02:14:33 PM
#5
People here think Signature campaigns or bounties are an privilege.I have had members abusing me for not updating the signature spreedsheet of the campaign I was managing as they wanted a quick confirmation if they're accepted.I don't know what to make of it but there certainly needs an authority to control this.


I get the same crap and it's ridiculous. I update the sheets in bounty campaigns once or twice a day. I have a life outside of that 1 campaign and refuse to update that sheet every single second. If you cannot wait for a response then do not join.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1317
Get your game girl
November 20, 2017, 02:03:39 PM
#4
People here think Signature campaigns or bounties are an privilege.I have had members abusing me for not updating the signature spreedsheet of the campaign I was managing as they wanted a quick confirmation if they're accepted.I don't know what to make of it but there certainly needs an authority to control this.

Lauda,or any DT member for that matter are free to leave whatever feedback they like.If you doubt,you need to talk to the person that added them on the trust list or take community's stance on it..As far as I know,all those feedback's from Lauda are accurate in most of the cases.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
November 20, 2017, 01:54:27 PM
#3
The problem is not 1 single person or the DT list. The problem is all you uneducated users that have no intention of learning rules. There are a ton of stickies to read as well as tutorials that can be found to guide you through the forum, yet noone cares to read or search for them.

People just hear they can make 10-100$ a week from signature campaigns so they buy 1 account and try to join 1. Then the greed kicks in and they buy 10 more accounts. All the while not caring or paying attention to the useless junk they are posting. All they see is hey I posted my 25 shitposts I want my money. Not how it works. You need xx amount of quality posts to be paid. You need to be constructive and on topic to be paid. You need to act like you have some sense.

Then you wanna say it's Laudas fault you make multiple accounts? No, it's your own fault. You need only 1 account and to read rules. There is no warning period or freebies. You have all the information in front of you but fail to care about it.

Then, when you get that account banned you are fucked. This doesn't mean well I got my account banned, i'll make a new 1. NO, this means when you get your account banned, we will tag the fuck outta every account you make afterwards for ban evasion.

Educate yourselves and you wouldn't face half the problems you think you face
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
November 20, 2017, 01:02:18 PM
#2
Get ready to have a lot of scams pop back up again Wink
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 1
November 20, 2017, 12:53:17 PM
#1
I think we have a serious problem in the forum.
Lauda and other members put negative trust without any rules. They created their own rules.
Sometimes they punish the intention. They don't have to report any proof.
The reference is not a proof.
They decided to apply  their own rules but they don't understand that the problem is the possibility to create multiple accounts.
Why Lauda doesn't ask theymos to link the account to an Id card or to a cellular phone number?
Lauda giving the neg trust, force you to create a new account.
Why Lauda doesn't ask Theymos to lock the  "Invites & Accounts". (remember that buying accounts is legit)
It should be very happy but doing this he would not have his game anymore.

So I ask to all of you to do something against this problem.

I think that we can ask every day  in every thread for a bounty campaign to the bounty manager  to put ~Lauda in his default trust list ignoring Lauda trust.

Maybe we can create a Signature asking for ~Lauda in the default trust.

We could create every days tons of account (remember it's not against the rule) posting this message in every thread and reporting this problem to DT1 users.

We have to do something, they put red trust to legit users without any rules, without anybody that told them to do, they punish the intention, this is witch-hunt.

So the fact is:
There are no rules
You can buy and sell account
You can ask to everyone to ignore Lauda putting ~Lauda in the default trust list.

Remember that Lauda can't be judged by anyone and ignoring him is the only weapon we have.

Pages:
Jump to: