Pages:
Author

Topic: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 94. (Read 143064 times)

legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
April 08, 2017, 03:19:09 AM
More discussion over at this other thread. Many are saying this might crash the price of BTC. I never thought of it that way. Do you all think so?

Re: They found Satoshi?

@OP you may have put so much time to make that evidence but for me non of them are convincing. And i think many other also feel same about your evidence.

Here we go again! another serious research thing about Satoshi? but your research was quite accepting with the evidence you have presented and the number of time he is involve in certain and major transaction between different country that will certainly pump up is idea currency and presenting the good benefits it has with the economy, I think you had a point in your research but there are still a big question mark in these, the real truth if Nash really is Satoshi? well one man can not certainly take a step in saying it and change our beliefs right?

No my evidence is based on the timing that he wasn't active publicly presenting was precisely the timing when Satoshi was active publicly.

And also on the focus of his Agencies game theory research being exactly what was needed to see the way from Szabo and Wei Dai's work to Satoshi's PoW solution.

And also because the timing when he went silent to work on coding Bitcoin was right about the time that Szabo (re-)published his bit gold, which was probably the key development that gave Nash the final insight on how to apply his Agencies research to his ideal money concept. Then the evidence shows he went quiet at that time, until right before he launched Bitcoin.

It all fits far too well.

You guys are too lazy to read carefully what I wrote in the linked research.


I don't think that exist some correlation between the price of bitcoin and the data given by you. So don't see in which these data will affect the price of bitcoin. As for being or not John Nash Satoshi Nakamoto this is impossible to be found because John Nash is dead. No signs after his dead give facts that John e Satoshi are the same person.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 03:11:38 AM
More discussion over at this other thread. Many are saying this might crash the price of BTC. I never thought of it that way. Do you all think so?

Re: They found Satoshi?

@OP you may have put so much time to make that evidence but for me non of them are convincing. And i think many other also feel same about your evidence.

Here we go again! another serious research thing about Satoshi? but your research was quite accepting with the evidence you have presented and the number of time he is involve in certain and major transaction between different country that will certainly pump up is idea currency and presenting the good benefits it has with the economy, I think you had a point in your research but there are still a big question mark in these, the real truth if Nash really is Satoshi? well one man can not certainly take a step in saying it and change our beliefs right?

No my evidence is based on the timing that he wasn't active publicly presenting was precisely the timing when Satoshi was active publicly.

And also on the focus of his Agencies game theory research being exactly what was needed to see the way from Szabo and Wei Dai's work to Satoshi's PoW solution.

And also because the timing when he went silent to work on coding Bitcoin was right about the time that Szabo (re-)published his bit gold, which was probably the key development that gave Nash the final insight on how to apply his Agencies research to his ideal money concept. Then the evidence shows he went quiet at that time, until right before he launched Bitcoin.

Nash's Agencies research was on Cooperation in Non-Cooperating Repeated Games, which is precisely what Satoshi's PoW is!

It all fits far too well.

You guys are too lazy to read carefully what I wrote in the linked research.

legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
April 08, 2017, 02:49:51 AM
Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!

Read this!

Very interesting info. All this activity about the ideal money from John Nash make him really in pol position for the name of Satoshi Nakamoto. Following then its life (having in mind "A beautiful mind" with Russell Crowe) everything become more clear. His situation make him the perfect person who can fit at the mysterious personage of Satoshi.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Best IoT Platform Based on Blockchain
April 08, 2017, 02:30:11 AM
Yeah, baby, yeah. Satoshi is a savior. Woo hooo! He is gonna save us from the banks and the governments with bitcoin! Woo hooo!

There is hope for the world! Woo hoo! With Satoshi Nakamoto, we will all be freeeee.....!!! Yippeee......!!

Satoshi! Satoshi! Satoshi! Satoshi!
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 535
Bitcoin- in bullish time
April 08, 2017, 02:25:45 AM
Satoshi nakamoto is one of the greatest person that i have ever known. He created the bitcoin which currency where using right now and it is one of the greatest invention in the internet because it is safe and it is anonymous so you don't need to worry about your informations. Bitcoin will be the next big currency.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
April 08, 2017, 01:44:56 AM
He was the actual inventor of the bitcoin technology a revolutionary technology that he had gifted to the world but government are putting ban on it
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 01:08:00 AM
Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!

Read this!
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
September 28, 2015, 12:42:53 PM
Satoshi Nakamoto is a person or a group of people who invented and started to creating bitcoins. Satoshi's identity is hidden , no one knows who the real satoshi nakamoto is. This is what i came to know about the creator of Bitcoins.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
September 28, 2015, 09:14:07 AM
He probably lost the keys and doesn't want to admit that, because everybody would call him dummy.  So he stays hidden to avoid life long embarrassment.

That's probably the most hilarious thought of what Satoshi did!

I prefer to believe that Nakamoto is modest about Bitcoin and instead of selling any Bitcoins, he'll keep them in his wallets forever.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
September 28, 2015, 08:58:55 AM
By the way, anybody knows Satoshi Nakamoto is a she or a he?   Grin
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 251
September 24, 2015, 03:06:02 PM
1. Satoshi is a group of people.

Satoshi... A group of people? *GASP* ILLUMINATI!!! :O
hero member
Activity: 729
Merit: 500
September 24, 2015, 02:51:10 PM
He probably lost the keys and doesn't want to admit that, because everybody would call him dummy.  So he stays hidden to avoid life long embarrassment.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
September 24, 2015, 01:26:59 PM
Based on the quality of the design/platform, I would surmise it wasn't written by a single person. Personally, I believe it was created as a way of maintaining quasi-liquidity during global financial turmoil. The ledger also allows trackbacks/history, so it would not surprise me if it was created by a nation state or states. The math and design are too elegant for a single person to have designed imho, but not out of the realm of possibilities.

The ledger is globally accessible, which would allow people with the means to track transactions during the fiat -> btc / btc-> fiat transition. When I see thousands of ATM's in my country that have no cameras I will remove my suspicions. Smiley


Ufo

This is why I think btc was created by a group of people, and they used the name "satoshi" so that there was always a mystery man (who doesnt actually exist) at the center of btc.  That way people spend their time looking for this "lone programmer", and the longer the group remains anonymous, the better their chances of staying anonymous are

To many things are created by only one person. To many invention are created by only one person. Why bitcoin must not be created by only one person?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
September 22, 2015, 06:18:36 AM
Based on the quality of the design/platform, I would surmise it wasn't written by a single person. Personally, I believe it was created as a way of maintaining quasi-liquidity during global financial turmoil. The ledger also allows trackbacks/history, so it would not surprise me if it was created by a nation state or states. The math and design are too elegant for a single person to have designed imho, but not out of the realm of possibilities.

The ledger is globally accessible, which would allow people with the means to track transactions during the fiat -> btc / btc-> fiat transition. When I see thousands of ATM's in my country that have no cameras I will remove my suspicions. Smiley


Ufo

This is why I think btc was created by a group of people, and they used the name "satoshi" so that there was always a mystery man (who doesnt actually exist) at the center of btc.  That way people spend their time looking for this "lone programmer", and the longer the group remains anonymous, the better their chances of staying anonymous are
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
September 21, 2015, 11:39:51 PM
Based on the quality of the design/platform, I would surmise it wasn't written by a single person. Personally, I believe it was created as a way of maintaining quasi-liquidity during global financial turmoil. The ledger also allows trackbacks/history, so it would not surprise me if it was created by a nation state or states. The math and design are too elegant for a single person to have designed imho, but not out of the realm of possibilities.

The ledger is globally accessible, which would allow people with the means to track transactions during the fiat -> btc / btc-> fiat transition. When I see thousands of ATM's in my country that have no cameras I will remove my suspicions. Smiley


Ufo
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
September 21, 2015, 11:28:39 PM
If that's even his name. Just read the bitcoin wiki on him and I'm amazed. Nobody knows him.

Long time passed since he last posted in here. Why? "Busy"? I don't think so. He was active when bitcoin needed support but since the slashdot...
Also, it seems has knowledge in many areas, especially economy. He doesn't act like the average human. Not taking advantage out of his creation, leaving without telling anything. Is he even a single person or a group?

How can someone create something so great and not stepping out to get the credit?

How old is he?  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
September 21, 2015, 09:11:48 AM
I don't know, but apparently "he" did tell WikiLeaks not to take Bitcoin because he didn't want the negative attention...

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/cryptocurrency-round-nakamoto-pleaded-wikileaks-bitcoin-boosted-by-dcc-1465842

What is apparent to me is that the the Western intelligence apparatus is capable of discovering his identity and equally capable of destroying Bitcoin if the central banks wanted it done yet though don't.  The DOJ has even said Bitcoin has beneficial purposes.  I think for monetary policy and other reasons the idea of a cashless economy with a traceable ledger is appealing to central banks and regulators.

Its also beneficial to those in favor of the surveillance state.  It would create a log that they could reference years down the line if they wanted to "get" someone for financial crimes...

But I agree, knowing the combined intelligence capabilities of the cia/nsa/etc, they should know who "satoshi" is, or at least be capable of identifying him if they wanted to.  For some reason I dont think they want to, makes me suspicious why they dont want to id him.   Unless of course they already have, and are using that info to their advantage...
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 503
September 21, 2015, 03:01:40 AM
I don't know, but apparently "he" did tell WikiLeaks not to take Bitcoin because he didn't want the negative attention...

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/cryptocurrency-round-nakamoto-pleaded-wikileaks-bitcoin-boosted-by-dcc-1465842

What is apparent to me is that the the Western intelligence apparatus is capable of discovering his identity and equally capable of destroying Bitcoin if the central banks wanted it done yet though don't.  The DOJ has even said Bitcoin has beneficial purposes.  I think for monetary policy and other reasons the idea of a cashless economy with a traceable ledger is appealing to central banks and regulators.

I saw this article posted on Btcointalk a few days ago - it's from the UK's most popular broadsheet, the Daily Telegraph, and quotes the Bank of England's Chief Economist (the BoE is the UK's central bank, the British equivalent of the Fed):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/bank-of-england/11874061/Negative-interest-rates-could-be-necessary-to-protect-UK-economy-says-Bank-of-England-chief-economist.html

Quote
Traditionally policymakers have resisted cutting rates below zero because when the returns on savings fall into negative territory, it encourages people to take their savings out of the bank and hoard them in cash.

This could slow, rather than boost, the economy. It would be possible to get around the problem of hoarding by abolishing cash, Mr Haldane said, adding: "What I think is now reasonably clear is that the payment technology embodied in [digital currency] Bitcoin has real potential."

(My emphasis)
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
September 21, 2015, 02:19:06 AM
The founder.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 501
September 18, 2015, 11:10:58 PM
I don't know, but apparently "he" did tell WikiLeaks not to take Bitcoin because he didn't want the negative attention...

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/cryptocurrency-round-nakamoto-pleaded-wikileaks-bitcoin-boosted-by-dcc-1465842

What is apparent to me is that the the Western intelligence apparatus is capable of discovering his identity and equally capable of destroying Bitcoin if the central banks wanted it done yet though don't.  The DOJ has even said Bitcoin has beneficial purposes.  I think for monetary policy and other reasons the idea of a cashless economy with a traceable ledger is appealing to central banks and regulators.
Pages:
Jump to: