You surely worked very hard finding him still can't say anything without proper verification but if this thing is real yes you will be the first to find out him. but still, his intentions are not clear like why did he left the project and did something happens to him? btw you said you can explain his leaving cause, care to tell us?
The one difference between our research and the others that have taken place over the years is that we used the information to lead us to a person. Not the other way round like the usual suspects. What this means is that the person it led us to fits a lot of the observations with data that has been available publicly. And the other findings explains some of the other mysteries.
Satoshi himself alludes to the fact that he had been working on Bitcoin since 2007 (slide 9). If you visit his profile on this forum and read all his posts and check his code comits, you will see active commentary on lots to do and active ideas for development. There was no suggestion of slowing down or quitting the project.
The sudden nature with the Bitcoin link to Wikileaks donation is the clear event that led to expedited disappearance. It is easy to forget how big an event Wikileaks was for major government intelligence bodies and so anything linked to it would have bought unwanted scrutiny from global intelligence services etc.
From slide 4, it is clears the holdings value at the time of leaving was small change. Note that $215,600 would have been the theoretical maximum if he wanted to cash out. Due to the illiquid nature of the markets in December 2010, the real cash-out value would have been a fraction of that.
So why did he leave? Based on the candidate it lead us to, pre-Bitcoin there was political-activism related links to a G20 country. Normally this would not seem a major concern, but having researched more into the global treatment of activists it is a major reason to leave the Bitcoin project while intelligence eyes fell on Bitcoin (due to the Wikileaks link). Think about what happened to Jamal Khashoggi in a well publicised recent case. Then ask yourself about the risks of activism for unknown personnel etc.
The good news is that the person it lead us to, seems a normal smart person. They even seemed to have a job for 2 years between 2011-13. So Satoshi definitely fits the good guy / legend definition.
So in summary, from our findings Satoshi left Bitcoin because of the risk of his identity being compromised for pre-Bitcoin activism activities. We got the feeling, his original plan was to develop Bitcoin within a small community and controlled increments. And he would have continued were it not for the sudden attention due to Wikileaks event.