Topic: Who is this micgoossens?? (Read 2186 times)

Surely, your choice.  Whether you truly understand the risk (which I presume that you do) that goes along with the upside of personal bitcoin promotion, when you publish such practices on the forum, you do end up opening up the topic of personal opsec for comment, and in some sense, the topic evolves beyond  you personally - because you have already made such choice.

Furthermore, if you want to advocate that others engage in similar kinds of behaviors (whether wearing hats, or getting tatoos, or driving lambos with personalized BTC related license plates or other markings), that is your choice too, but such advocacy is also likely to spark a decent amount of push back on the forum, too, regarding best practices.. whether on a personal security level or from a bitcoin advertising angle.  I personally know someone who was contemplating marking his boat (that was acquired completely with bitcoin profits) with a marking that says something like:  "gotten from bitcoin," but I discussed the pros and cons of such markings, and the person came to his senses and decided to be more discreet in regards to his own finances.


Yes.  A personal choice about what is most important, especially when it comes to your own decisions to wear labels and in what circumstances.


Seems that you are considering this matter too personally, if you are considering the topic of gams and the topic of wearing of BTC markings to be related.



I made this related comment larger because it seems to deserve a comment, too.

As you likely realize, there is going to be a lot of variance in perspective in terms of when and how much one person or another will consider lines to be crossed.


O.k.  have fun.

 

yeah i know, i am on the edge of sharing sometimes

but from the moment when i  tattooed the rollercoaster on my arm, is the moment when i show to not give a F*** about much i guess.....

whatever i do or have done ..... i'm a TRUE BTC'er  and thats most important of all. 

i hope the next time when i have some new GAME list  thing to see some new names after this thread








the guy's that says i have to be a bit carefull are absolutly right and much appriciated, but i think being on the edge is OK.... just don't cross is

btw don't mind me today please, cause i'm out and for me.... saturday isn't about shomer shabbos but about getting out and be a bit of TOTAL WASTED.

boys cheers on this fine saturday, wear a HAT and be safe......

I am pulling your chain a bit, and largely my suggestion remains that people cannot really know, with any degree of certainty, the extent to which the online personality of any of us matches with our in real life personality(ies).

My practice has not been any kind of attempt to hide behind the pseudo-anonymity of my on-line personality; however, I have become a bit more comfortable with the passage of time, to play around with such dynamic - so there has been some evolution of my approach, rather than my starting out in a particular way and sticking with it.

Actually, I do appreciate the variety of personas in this space, including the pseudo-anonymity of most of the forum accounts, the public outedness of other persons in the space, even while there is a certain value to looking someone in the face to figure out whether to trust that person more or less with personal information.

The longer that any of us is in the bitcoin (or crypto) space, the more likely we have a combination of relationships, and even discretionary privacy, and my go to answer for people, in real life, who ask me how much BTC I own (upon their first finding out that I am interested in bitcoin) is to ask them a similar question about how much gold they have and how much money they have in their bank accounts.  Usually, the common sense of the inquisitive person will "get it" after just one response from me (in form of a question), but a few of them are stubborn and say that they are ready, willing and able to be transparent about their bank accounts and their other assets. 

My subsequent response, without actually asking the inquisitive person to reveal any of their personal financial details, is that likely they do not have very much to lose if they are willing to disclose such personal financial information (implying that it should be private).  For the most part, I have not had to pursue such conversations of sharing personal financial information beyond that point, yet my general disposition, at that point, becomes to outwardly acknowledge that I am dealing with an inquisitive person who cannot control his/her own level of snoopiness about a topic that they should respect as being private.  So even, if some people want to disclose their own personal finances, seemingly because they want you to reciprocate, to some degree I may be willing to listen to so of their personal information that they want to disclose, and usually, I put a certain level of skepticism in their degree of openness which causes me more skepticism about sharing any of my actual personal information with them (whether financial or otherwise), unless I want the information to leak (which seems likely when dealing with that kind of person).

nobody is outraged in here its just been a fun talk with a HAT-invasion in here......

btw i think its going to be quied here today cause of



you know.... the not doing anything on saturdays :p


and no ratings we are all just some "COOL-NERDS" in here 

What is this table What are the ratings for? And why are you so outraged? Thank you)

HEY! Don't noose the goose!

Pretty sure that Vod thinks he has better things to do ('busting scams' lol smh) than gracing us with his presence.
He should therefore be wearing this frankly totally decentralised and miles more appropriate hat

Nooo!  You won't hurt my feelings if you do.. well, you might a little, but I'll get over it.

While I may have the ability to create an online personality, I choose to be a reflection of who I am IRL. And even though I may have some personal personality traits to work on, I generally try not to alter my personality or character based on the suggestions of others wanting to be appeased... this sounds like a politician.. or a comedian.

It wouldn't be very nerd-like of me to join something just because other nerds are doing it!

@VOD

i did enjoy your thread in here had a good laugh for sure, you seem to be a great guy



cheers gonna enjoy this HAT created coffee

Haha Nice one XhomerX

Now he just nerds to wear it..... like why wouldn’t he ?
Its just a very COOL/NERD avatar the perfect balanced MIX of everything

You mean... Vod made a joke? Tar and feather him!

Disclaimer: this was a joke too

It is interesting to know this is the basis you like to leave trust. I will need to remember this

 I couldn't resist. 



Avatar-sized

The only way you join the nerd squad is by getting into chipmixer. Most of them be nerds there ,SMH. I am just an asshole who acts like like he knows what he is doing but all I am is a shilly-shally.

cOld bLoOded betrayel. 

---

Honestly that WO is some next level shit, I'd rather figure out how bitcoin than getting into that. 

Surely, you are not knocking "chuckle criteria" since you have mentioned chuckle as one of your own smerit sending criteria on at least a couple of occasions, if my memory serves me well (which usually it does serve me sufficiently decent when it comes to stalking the jbreher... hahahhahahhaa)

actualy your very right its still XhomerX on top of that BEAR

i apologize SIR

added back in the HAT list

just some "NERD GUYS"------> to------>"COOL GUYS" hypnosis   

but all BTC HODLERS so thats not to bad

gonna try hypnose the other guys as well to visit the WO from time to time

WALL OBSERVER =





there's no name but just name it : THE BTCbullHODLwallobservingNonScammersAntiSHitcoinHATGANG  or something

Haha. Looks like goose threw me out of the hat gang 'cause I wanted to wear mine on my head. C'est la guerre.

Word to the seekers: WO has a probably the highest concentration of merit sources on the board. And some reward in proportion to chuckles.

I am kind of thinking that without necessarily creating different forum accounts, each of us has an ability to create our on-line persona, and maybe even to start over? 

Of course, each of us has our personal predilections, too.  For example, quite frequently I receive suggestions about how I should or could modify my online personality in one way or another that might be more satisfying to some others, and other readings into my online persona as if my online persona is equivalent to my in real life persona. 

Of course, there is going to be some overlap, but there certainly can be abilities in the non-meat space, when not distracted by the actual meat.