Every student of the political economy who understands the style of the work of the technique of Blockchain and Bitcoin BTC will be absolutely sure that the next alternative to the classical system is the digital currencies, which by their characteristics (speed - privacy - lack of costs - decentralization of the system ...) The foundations of political economy in all its schools, from Aristotle and Ibn Khaldun to Marx, Adam Smith and Keynes and finally with Friedman. These scholars, who laid the foundations of economic thought through money supply, can control the economy of countries and their economic policy.
In my opinion, Noble In the economy of this great invention that will change humanity and will throw our lives upside down in so-called Internet value ..........
They aren’t afraid at all. They know bitcoin is too unstable and corrupt to be a problem. They do see the value in blockchain technology and are researching ways to implement it into normal banking.
People don’t understand what bitcoin really is on this forum so they think bitcoin can topple governments and crush evil bankers. Neither of those are true.
Bitcoin is a computerized transaction ledger. It’s nothing but a secure way to share a database worldwide. That’s why it takes two elephants to move a blockchain copy across the street. Imagine having a copy of quicken database software and adding an internet protocol to it and then using it to store every transaction used to buy anything worldwide. That database would quickly become an enormous unnavigable nightmare that takes days to download at high speed (exactly what’s happening right now to bitcoin).
Bitcoin cannot topple governments. The US governments budget and computer financial storage method does not approve and vote for the president. The president approves and votes for the budget. Almost all dollars used worldwide today are not pieces of paper handed across oceans, they are digital representations of dollars. These transactions are stored in huge databases. The EFT/ACH System transfers transaction volumes so enormous it would cripple bitcoin in about 90 seconds if bitcoin were used instead. EFT/ACH doesn’t require dollars. Those transactions could be denominated in anything and the EFT/ACH database wouldn’t care because it’s only tracking transactions. All the fed does is electronically control money amounts. If they used bitcoin the first thing they would do is change the 21m limit.
Bitcoin cannot end banking as we know it. Just the opposite. Blockchain technology could make individual banks transactions more fast and secure. Blockchain wouldn’t be fast enough to handle the ACH/EFT System but it could replace one companies system pretty effectively. That’s why big banking is researching it. Banks can use any currency for their transactions (even bitcoin if they wanted to). Using bitcoin would not change the way the bank does business. It would simply change the currency it’s using from dollars or yen to bitcoin. Banks don’t print money they make loans in some currency. Bitcoin won’t change that business model.
Anyone that says this is wrong is a fool that doesn’t understand how the world works. They shouldn’t be allowed to vote because they will end up putting some dumbass like Donald Trump in office.