Topic: Why Are We Even Considering a Ban on AI Tools Like ChatGPT? - page 2. (Read 197 times)
I’m pretty sure that ChatGPT is not the reason these users are banned; it is because of how they use it. What I mean is that they just copy and paste ChatGPT’s responses to their questions or any kind of response and then they post it without doing anything themselves in the post. There’s many users being tagged by using AI or ChatGPT for posting and not getting banned.
Large language models like ChatGPT, Glaude, Grok and other use the same training process(I have forgotten the right word to put here) when you use them, their answers are mostly similar. Using them in a forum that encourages human interaction, and likeliness will erase what forum should be.
Don't use AI tools they don't help the forum grow. It makes the member have false knowledge without learning or making any real contributions.
Don't use AI tools they don't help the forum grow. It makes the member have false knowledge without learning or making any real contributions.
If you want to use AI for your personal gain, you are free to use it. If you said the use of AI should publicly be accepted and accepted by everyone allowed to use it, then there should not be any need for anyone to come here and be making contributions of any kind in posts; you can just be communicating with your ChatGPT; you don't need anyone's help or attention.
If you make any post or you have something from which you derive the answer from the AI tool ChatGPT or whichever one you use, I don't see any crime if you come out, quote the word, and ask your question and/or pass the information the way you want to pass it, but let everyone know that this is from ChatGPT instead of trying to fool everyone around.
If you make any post or you have something from which you derive the answer from the AI tool ChatGPT or whichever one you use, I don't see any crime if you come out, quote the word, and ask your question and/or pass the information the way you want to pass it, but let everyone know that this is from ChatGPT instead of trying to fool everyone around.
Alright, folks, we need to talk about this push to ban AI tools like ChatGPT on Bitcointalk. Honestly, it’s pretty concerning. Why are we even thinking about this?
For transparency's sake, I’ll admit it—I love ChatGPT and use it to write just about everything these days. It’s a tool that helps me express my thoughts more clearly and efficiently. I believe AI is incredibly useful. It can answer questions, provide insights, and spark some serious discussions. Instead of pushing it away, we should be embracing it. It’s a resource that can enhance our conversations and make this community even better.
Now, let’s address those AI/chatbot detectors that are making the rounds. They’re a huge problem. We’ve seen countless false accusations come from these tools, and it’s not just here; it’s happening in academic settings too. If you want a solid read on this, check out "The Case Against AI Detectors" from the University of Iowa. It lays out the issues with these detectors and their unreliability. Imagine putting in all that effort only to be told you’re using AI when you’re not. It’s not just frustrating; it’s downright ridiculous.
And let’s not forget some relevant history. Remember when the UK tried to ban cars? That was a massive mistake that stifled progress and innovation. People ended up stuck with horse-drawn carriages for way too long! Banning AI now could lead us down a similar path, where we miss out on the benefits and advancements that come with embracing new technology. Instead of shutting it down, we should be figuring out how to integrate it responsibly into our community.
Honestly, this whole discussion about banning AI feels pretty stupid when we could be focusing on real issues, like banning trolls who create chaos on the forum. All successful communities have good moderation and take action against those who want to disrupt things. Let’s put our energy into that instead.
So, I’m asking you all—should we really be banning AI, or can we find a way to make it work for us?
For transparency's sake, I’ll admit it—I love ChatGPT and use it to write just about everything these days. It’s a tool that helps me express my thoughts more clearly and efficiently. I believe AI is incredibly useful. It can answer questions, provide insights, and spark some serious discussions. Instead of pushing it away, we should be embracing it. It’s a resource that can enhance our conversations and make this community even better.
Now, let’s address those AI/chatbot detectors that are making the rounds. They’re a huge problem. We’ve seen countless false accusations come from these tools, and it’s not just here; it’s happening in academic settings too. If you want a solid read on this, check out "The Case Against AI Detectors" from the University of Iowa. It lays out the issues with these detectors and their unreliability. Imagine putting in all that effort only to be told you’re using AI when you’re not. It’s not just frustrating; it’s downright ridiculous.
And let’s not forget some relevant history. Remember when the UK tried to ban cars? That was a massive mistake that stifled progress and innovation. People ended up stuck with horse-drawn carriages for way too long! Banning AI now could lead us down a similar path, where we miss out on the benefits and advancements that come with embracing new technology. Instead of shutting it down, we should be figuring out how to integrate it responsibly into our community.
Honestly, this whole discussion about banning AI feels pretty stupid when we could be focusing on real issues, like banning trolls who create chaos on the forum. All successful communities have good moderation and take action against those who want to disrupt things. Let’s put our energy into that instead.
So, I’m asking you all—should we really be banning AI, or can we find a way to make it work for us?
Jump to: