What exactly is your argument against the price of bitcoin rising further to $2000 and beyond? I don't see why the exchanges couldn't sustain higher prices, as long as they can handle the volume and the increased amount of fiat on the books. Your point about Gold also doesn't make any sense whatsoever to me. An ounce of Gold is sitting at $1200 right now, so what? It doesn't explain or say anything at all, what the hell is your point?
Go back and read the first post I wrote on the first page. Everything you just asked me was already asnwered there. I already explained in detail, in two different posts, why I am concerned that the price won't shoot up past $2,000. It has nothing to do with the 'exchanges being able to handle' the volume. Where is that coming from? Gold a commodity that's been around for thousands of years, is considered by nearly *everyone* to be more valuable than Bitcoin, is well known to be purchasable in divisible amounts, and yet here it sits at $1200? Yet Bitcoin is going to $100,000? Im asking who is going to spend the money to get it there. Not sure what's so hard to comprehend about my question...
You're comparing apples to oranges. Gold is not worth $1200, an ounce of Gold is worth $1200. Comparing that to the price of 1 bitcoin is just silly. It just amazes me how you don't seem to be able to wrap your head around this point. There are only 12 million bitcoins right now and there are much more than 12 million ounces of Gold out there. Your argument would have made more sense if you would compare the market cap of Gold to that of Bitcoin. And if you do that you'll find that Bitcoin's market cap isn't even at 0.2% of that of Gold right now. So yeah, plenty of room to go up for Bitcoin.
I still prefer to hold 100 ounces of Gold than 100 Bitcoins at USD 1240....
Sometimes it feels good to be right...
You can just as easily be wrong in 2 weeks lol