Topic: Why do people hate islam? - page 54. (Read 221036 times)

Yes: Muslims.

I believe there is a name for people like that...

Looks like by her own report, she was 9 (or even 8 taken the Lunar Calendar is shorter)... not much of an adult, eh?
(he was 54)

Right.  Like, there's not exactly cable tv.  No ATVs to go play with.  Music's not even allowed.

And there you are in a tent with some luscious young...

i had a quick google and obviously isis is a different ball game "of sorts" but from what i can gather if theres grass on the pitch then its game on. maybe someone who actually is a follower of said faith can correct me on this?

Google it. Tell us if it is fake or not. Easy.

Surely the whole child bride thing is just some kind of propoganda. I couldnt beleive that happeneing in this day and age , although i may have read before that they do marry at a young age albeit older than what your photo shows, but they dont actually move in together untill they are adults. Saying that im sure mohammad was shagging children from what i remember.

    Ameer Abu-Hammad allegedly asked agents if they would search his phone for “other stuff” after he posted about jihad on Facebook. Oops.

    A North Carolina teen suspected of providing material support to ISIS, Hamas, and a branch of al Qaeda was instead busted for child porn.

    In October, federal agents searched 18-year-old Ameer Abu-Hammad’s home and electronic devices seeking evidence that he was providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization. When agents confronted Abu-Hammad at college, he asked them if they would also search his phone for “other stuff,” according to a criminal complaint.

    “The agents asked him to clarify and soon afterwards, he admitted that he had additionally used the phone to view pornogrpahy online that included minors,” the complaint continues, adding that Abu-Hammad allegedly said he prefered his laptop for adult porn and his phone for kid porn.

    “The youngest child he recalled having seen within pornographic images was a child of approximately 9 or 10 years of age,” the complaint said. “Hammad admitted that he had been viewing child pornography for roughly two months.”

    Graphic descriptions of the pornography found on Abu-Hammad’s devices note that it featured children as young as six to nine months. Agents said they found approximately 39 images on his devices, featuring mostly young girls.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/05/feds-go-looking-for-isis-find-child-porn-instead.html

Still asking why?

Oh, changing the subject from"Why hate Islam" to your own crackpot religious ideas and then to UFOs?

Okay.

I am not a scholar of old books... Really? Then tell me what is Anthropology? By the way, you think that you can really use the word Logic in order to say that this facts are non-sense?

“We are already here, among you. Some of us have always been here, with you, yet apart from, watching, and occasionally guiding you whenever the opportunity arose.”

According to Brinsley Le Poer Trench, editor of Flying Saucer Review, this otherworldly message appeared for the first time in a 1947 issue of Fanatic Stories written by an author under the pseudonym “Alexander Blade”. Curiously, it was made available only a few months after one of the most talked-about UFO incidents: Roswell.

Genghis Khan allowed people of other religions to remain in their religion. He allowed Islam to remain, rather than destroying people for following it. I wonder if this was the reason that his kingdom was ultimately broken after he passed.

Temujin (Genghis Khan) conquered way more way faster than Muhammad could have even dreamed. Yet, he allowed people he conquered to maintain the religion of their choice.

Do you respect the religions Mohammed destroyed when he and his followers captured Mecca?

What's telling is not the community attitude, and neither the attitude of the police, but the silence - and hence approval - of the local Muslim community of these actions.

That's the way they do it.

Good little Jihad boys.

“Sh*tty Christians”: Militant Muslim youths storm a Christmas service at a Church in Mönchengladbach, Germany


This is Europe, not the Middle East. *Crickets chirping* in parliaments, political chambers and newsrooms across the world.

Will the islamofauxbia never end? Meanwhile, across the pond, the intrepid FBI is chasing down the bacon-bandito.

    “Sh*tty Christians”: Belligerent Muslim youths storm a Christmas service at a Church in Mönchengladbach

    »Scheiß Christen«: Randalierende Muslime stürmen in Mönchengladbach eine Kirche – Kopp Online

    Only one of the youths was even 14 years old, the other 5 were just young children. Nonetheless, they behaved like adult radical extremists. The young Muslims stormed the Rheydter Marien Church in Mönchengladbach on Christmas Eve. They interrupted the manger festival by running through the halls during the service, all the while yelling and cursing at churchgoers saying, “Shitty Christians!” And what happened after that? Not much beyond a small article in a local paper.

    Imagine it were the other way around: wild Christian children storming into a mosque and abusing praying Muslims! 50 minutes later there would have been an emergency news break during the daily television programming…special edition pages in FAZ and the Süddeutsche Zeitung would have gone to press.

    …

    The  reflex of the mainstream media? It was Muslims so all is silent…there were only a few who showed civil courage in the church. One of the church members nabbed two of the children in the heat of the moment. Later a police detail released the two to their parents at a nearby McDonalds.





    The pastor Manfred Riethdorf (Photo: right) doesn’t want to let the matter go so lightly, and files a formal complaint against the 14-yr-old for disturbance of the peace. This is likely because he doesn’t believe it was just a stupid youthful prank.

    “Shitty Christians.” And especially at Christmas? How do these young Muslims know what their actions will invoke? Their parents or other adults must have infected them with this knowledge.

    If adult Muslims had stormed the church, they would not have been let off so easily without punishment. Against minor children one cannot do much. Is this all a coincidence or were the children sent like an instrument of religious extremism?

    Upon direct questioning, the police refused to confirm the religious background of the young offenders. The pastor himself energetically replied: “I explained clearly to them, how one should act in a church. Possibly tomorrow I will try to establish contact with their parents to discuss this event with them and their children.”

    The police have not shown as much initiative. The relationship between Christians and Muslims in Mönchengladbach is tense, otherwise this would not have happened, but up until now the media have still not reported on the event.

    Official Muslim leaders have said nothing and the local politicians are silent. No one wants to throw oil on a fire.

    Silence is falsely understood consideration. To talk about the issue would call integration politics into question. There would be an international media echo if Germany tried to discuss (such behavior) of Muslims gone wild.

    One must also see: He who presses (the issue), will confirm the fears of “concerned citizens.” They feel that life with Muslims in Germany has become more difficult, but one does not talk about it. Now so called “concerned citizens” see their worries again confirmed.
    (Note – “concerned citizens” or “besorgte Bürger” is a buzz word in Germany for right-wing extremists)

    Another article (here) suggests that Pastor Riethdorf suggests this incident should lead to a community culture of discussion.

Yes, more inter-faith dialogue. That’s the ticket.


http://pamelageller.com/2016/01/shtty-christians-militant-muslim-youths-storm-a-christmas-service-at-a-church-in-monchengladbach-germany.html/

I did not mention ISIS or Taliban.

You are at least in part incorrect, as Islam does teach to stone to death adulterers, and to kill apostates of Islam.  Islam does teach killings.

But I have little interest in arguing those details. 

I asked - was Yassir Arafat a good Muslim?

Probably not. But don't know if linking religion to movements for national liberation says much. Most or all of those movements were terrorist. Palestinian movement of course. Israeli movement against the british and palestinians. American movement against the british, its own population to stop cooperation, against the native americans. Etc.

You defend Islam because you're ignorant about it... that's all.

My respectable friend, you know why I defend Islam, just because today some Muslims forget the real teachings of Islam, and thats why I strongly condemnd them. Islam never teachs or preach TO KILL ANY PERSON, but people today killed innocent persons on the name of ISLAM. I just wants to tell you in very respectable manner that please do not think that these type of techings are true Islam. Muslims forget the real teachings of Muhammad (peace be upon him) same as some Christans forget the true teachings of Jesus (peace be upon him). I respect all the religions because no one preach the bad things. I just want that if you talk about any group (indivisual) like ISIS or Taliban, never think that is the Islam. please

Without sword there won't be Islam at all, it never spread on any other way. STOP LYING AND DECEIVE YOURSELF!