Topic: Why do people hate islam? - page 58. (Read 221077 times)

Some Muslims translate Jihad to English using the word "struggle." There's been a "My Jihad" ad campaign describing Muslims struggling to be better people and stuff. In German, "My Struggle" would be translated as "Mein Kampf." This is probably just a historical coincidence (although Hitler was allied with Muslims), but it's still quite an interesting coincidence.

It's the people who believe Islam isn't dangerous who are doing the assuming. The only way to believe Islam isn't dangerous is to be utterly ignorant of Islam's origins, teachings and history.

NOPE ITS A WAY OF LIFE THAT IS BULLSHIT LIKE ALL RELIGIONS A waste of human time

BADECKER..derrrrrr they know more about Christianity than you do that is where its come from ARAB nations .. Oh i forgot you been sent from god to spread a new Christianity

GET THE MEN IN THE WHITE COATS FOR THIS GUY

YOU SAID YOU BEEN SENT FROM GOD
LOCK THIS GUY UP

Muhammad (PBUH) in bible

MATTHEW:
Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and build a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country. And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandsmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants, more than the first : and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, this is the heir; come, let us kill him and let us sieze on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. When the Lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen which shall render him the fruits in the seasons. Jesus saith unto them, ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore I say unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken away from you and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. 21.33/44

I think it's because people fail to realise what Islam really is... They assume it's something dangerous.

Argue with this bright young female everything she says I am with her 8 min long video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXGE2eBUdlQ
[/quote]

I am noe surprised to see that video, every true man faced the eligations like her. There are so many differences we see today in Christanity and any other religion, if someone intrested then i will posted all the differences. The Holy Prophet Jesus, what are his saying and how many christans actually follow them. First i wanna share, the existance of Muhammad (PBUH) in bible: -

The Holy Prophet in the Bible

DEUTRONOMY:
I will raise them a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 18/18

JOHN:
If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father and he shall give you a Comforter, that he man abide with you forever;

These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom tile Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

Nevertheless I tell you the truth: It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you: but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Sprit of truth is come, he will guide you into all the truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. 14.15/16: & 25 /26: 16.7 & 12/14

DEUTERONOMY:
And this is the blessing, wherewith Moses the man of God blessed the children of Israel before his death. And he said, The lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Sier unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came forth with ten thousand of saints; from his right hand went a feiry law for them. Yea he loved the people; all his saints are in thy head: and they sat down at thy feet; every one shall receive of thy words. 33.1/3

HABAKKUK:
God came from Teman, and the Holy One from mount Paran. Seleh! His glory covered the heavens, and the earth was full of his praise. And his brightness was as the light: he had horns coming out of his hands and there was the hiding of his power. Before him went the pestilence, and burning coals went forth at his feet. He stood and measured the earth: he beheld and drove asunder the nations; and the everlasting mountains were scattered, the perpetual hills did bow: his ways were everlasting. I saw the tents of Cushan in affliction and the curtains of the land of Midian did tremble. 3.3/7

Argue with this bright young female everything she says I am with her 8 min long video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXGE2eBUdlQ

Now, do you actually believe all that bullshit?  I ask because there is a strong scent of Takiyya in the air.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYJiFOZkev0

The preception of Islam now is worst, because of some groups, the rebal groups who affliate theirselves with Islam, and killed the inncocent people. This is a big issue thats why people do not likes Islam. However Islam strongly conndems these types of attacks, even Islam said that assasination of one person is equals to killing of mankind.

The concept of JIHAD (Fight) in Islam is that: -

Through the actions of some elements, the western world visualizes a wrong concept of Jihad (Holy War). The word Jihad conjures up the vision of a marching band of religious fanatics with savage beards and fiery eyes, brandishing swords and attacking the infidels.

Jihad in Islamic terminology means to make an effort, to endeavour and to strive in a noble way. Over the centuries this meaning of Jihad has been obliterated or at least diluted. The critical juncture in the Islamic world requires reviving and recapturing the true and pristine meaning of Jihad.

Jihad can be divided into two broad categories. First is Jihad-e-akbar. This is Jihad against one's own person to curb sinful inclinations, i.e., purification of self. This is the most difficult Jihad and hence in terms of rewards and blessings is the highest category of Jihad.

The second is Jihad-e-asghar. This is Jihad of the sword. This is communal Jihad and presupposes certain specific conditions. The Quran speaks of fighting only against those who first attack Muslims and this is the very condition laid down in other verses of the Holy Quran as well. The so-called verse of the sword in the Islamic scripture is often taken out of context as if it inculcates an indiscriminate massacre of all unbelievers. The Quranic words such as kill whatever you find them apply only in cases where the enemy has first attacked Muslims and apply to those unbelievers and enemies who break their oaths and firm agreements. They do not apply to unprovoked wars and battles. To interpret these verses in any other manner would be a travesty of the lofty ideals of Islam. There is not a single instance in the life of the Holy Prophet where he offered the alternative of the sword or Islam to anyone.

The Western media and even some scholars sometimes ignore the distinction between these two aspects of Jihad. It must be remembered that the Holy Quran does not make Jihad, the holy war, in context of an article of faith. The sayings and traditions of the Holy Prophet render it into a formula for active struggle that invariably and incorrectly tended towards a militant expression. Modern day terrorism is contrary to the purview of the real spirit of the Islamic Jihad.

The presentation of Islam as a crude and barbaric religion which gives itself the right to cause unwarranted human and material suffering and destruction under the guise of Divine authority, is not the kind of Islam we find in the Holy Quran and in the precepts of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him!)

The need to generate and use sock puppets is so telling.

Soon all we say Allaho Akbar

This is one of those things makes me pity ignorant science types. They tell us science is religion by how they handle it. Then we tell them the same thing in a straight-forward manner. Then they go about proving it to be religion by the ways that they say it is not religion.

At the same time, they tell us that the Bible is not being tested for truth scientifically. Yet, when they are shown the testing that not only proves that the Bible is truth, but also that it is religion by showing us our inability to perceive everything, they want to throw religion under the bus, even though they express theory in science, which shows any understanding person that science is religion.

Amazing! All that scientific study, and yet so much ignorance.

This is one of those things that religious people do either out of willful or actual ignorance. I'll admit it, it straight up pisses me off. If you do NOT understand a term, LEARN.

Theory does NOT mean in science what it means in common usage. Science operates basically under two axioms. One, that all things CAN BE known. (not ARE known). Two, that one needs a framework to test postulates to best describe known facts.

Until such time as a thing has been proven far in excess of what is necessary to convict for murder, it is NOT theory. It's a postulate. Even if it APPEARS to be correct, such as the Causal Order Postulate, which has remained a postulate for decades because it cannot be properly reconciled with existing theory.

A THEORY, by contrast, is that which best describes the known facts, has been reviewed, tested, reviewed again, and tested again ad nauseam until so little of it remains speculative that it is deemed to be the best description of the facts at hand AND has been rigorously tested. In the scientific method, we do not test to PROVE a postulate, we test to DISPROVE. Every test is designed to make the postulate fail. When all tests that can be conceived have failed to disprove a postulate, it becomes part of the general theory of that particular discipline. If additional tests can be thought up, and they are frequently, they are undertaken. Once it's accepted as theory, additional questions do not make it leave the theory UNLESS they disprove all or part of the existing theory, again, with extreme rigor.

By contrast, Religion accepts as truth so called "holy writ" and if they test at all, test with extreme bias towards what is already believed, do not do so under peer review, and frequently hide or distort the known facts in order to perpetuate the dogma.

That made me laugh. For those unaware of modern historical conventions:

Old Money (I love that!)
 B.C. Before Christ. Misnomer even biblically... but relates to the alleged birth of christ.
 A.D. Anno Domini. Latin for "In the year of our Lord".

Modern Convention

CE Common Era. Corresponds with A.D.
BCE Before common Era. Corresponds with B.C.

I do like these theories.

The point is, the development of engineered equipment does not change a theory into a fact. It might, at times, help to do so, but not necessarily.

No sir, they are still theories.
The only thing above theory is a law.

The correct term is "that's just an hypothesis ".

If there are any theories that are in line with the science used to make these things work, then they are not theories any longer. They are facts.

If engineers happened to develop some of these things because they looked at the theories, if the theories were not proven to be fact, then the engineers applied other than the theories to make the fact of the working things.

Theory and engineering are two completely different things. Both may be called science by many. But pure science that has theories within its realms, also has science fiction by way of those theories.

You are reading this using;

The theory of computing,
The digital theory,
The RF theory,
The electronics theory,
The electrical theory,
The theory of general relativity,
The theory of special relativity (satellites)

Amongst many others... But hey they are "just theories ". Happens that if a single one in the stack is wrong you will not read this...