I was at a dysfunctional stoplight today, and I think it was a perfect example for my point with social order.
The lady next to me stopped before the intersection, waited for one group of cars from the other lane to move past the light, and proceeded to move before her turn. In this instance, she didn't play by the rules that everyone else did.. and you know what? She was rewarded for it, by saving time.
Anarchists believe government is to blame for everything, and in this case.. government is the car (a vessel for social order). But you know what? The problem was not the car, but the human being behind it. A common response I'd probably get to that is "well, if she didn't have the car, there wouldn't have been a problem. Anarchists always point to the variable, the car (government) and not the human being (the constant) behind it. If you were waiting in line at disneyland, would you say "if the person didn't have legs, there would be no cutting in line"?
Everyone had their own car, and this one person made a decision that only effected herself (and of course, the people she could've put in danger.) In the way government is setup now, only a handful of people have cars, which everyone else must drive in. If your political leader (i.e. driver) decides to do something dangerous like skip their turn for a small gain, all the other passengers in other vehicles say, "Those fucking (your nation here) almost got us killed! I hate these guys!" You didn't have anything to do with it, but you're still to blame.
Anarchists don't have a problem with cars, they have a problem with who gets to drive, and for whom those people drive for. The anarchist wants to equip everyone with a car just for themselves, and the people they take care of i.e. family and such who cannot yet drive. They don't blame cars; they blame the people who use violence to prevent everyone else from having one.
