It's already has been proven. The link between CFR and the Bitcoin's creator Satoshi Nakamoto exists.
The link between NSA and me exists, so I'm the NSA.Provide information, with links now.
Topic: Why Doesnt Satoshi Continue Replying on the Forum? - page 2. (Read 5019 times)
Provide information, with links now.
It's already has been proven. The link between CFR and the Bitcoin's creator Satoshi Nakamoto exists.
Several my posts connecting Satoshi group to the CFR and cashless society implementation were censored, so apparently I'm not welcome here. I know the truth hurts. But sometimes this is necessary evil to evade problems in the future.
You can't really prove any of this. I could be Satoshi, the poster above or under could be Satoshi. I could be part of the NSA, FBI, you never know.. (Deletion of this post would mean that Satoshi is afraid of public inquiry)
They also put deliberate disinformation to confuse the public about cryptography. For example:
They also put deliberate disinformation to confuse the public about cryptography. For example:
If the mods had any sense of humor they would delete this post.
Why did Satoshi disappear completely? He could have stayed on the forums and could reply to our questions on bitcoin.
He should just return. Please. Thank you.
He should just return. Please. Thank you.
Prolly cause he was never here
Quote
If you want to wallow in defeatism, fine.
No, I'm not. What I proposed I already expressed:
1. Alternative Internet (could be decentralized WiFi router based).
2. New system of encryption of messages over the network - private cryptography where the ciphers are unknown to the Secret Government.
3. Arms. You better get yourself a gun in the world that's coming.
Great to hear! All those all ideas are something I can support.
I think we cripple ourselves by presuming that the enemy has every advantage and therefore anything we don't fully understand must be a part of the NSA's sinister plan to enslave humanity.
Several my posts connecting Satoshi group to the CFR and cashless society implementation were censored, so apparently I'm not welcome here. I know the truth hurts. But sometimes this is necessary evil to evade problems in the future.
Why did Satoshi disappear completely? He could have stayed on the forums and could reply to our questions on bitcoin.
He should just return. Please. Thank you.
He should just return. Please. Thank you.
Or he/they could have chose to walk away and chose that bitcoin doesn't have a leading figure for governments/media/critics to constantly go after and look for character flaws.
I prefer this approach, let bitcoin be bitcoin and grow and reach it's full potential. Bitcoin is about bitcoin, not about who started it.
I'm sure he/she/they are still very active in the community, they just don't have the ego to present themselve(s) as the creator of bitcoin.
Sure they are. Their baby is not yet ready to grow without parents..
(Deletion of this post would mean that Satoshi is afraid of public inquiry)
They also put deliberate disinformation to confuse the public about cryptography. For example:
But the truth goes like this...
They also put deliberate disinformation to confuse the public about cryptography. For example:
Quote
In cryptography, the one-time pad (OTP) is a type of encryption that is impossible to crack if used correctly.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_padBut the truth goes like this...
Quote
The OTP
The OTP or one time pad is commonly held up as the one example of an unbreakable cipher. Yet NSA has clearly described breaking the VENONA cipher, which used an OTP, during the Cold War. It is argued that VENONA was "poorly used," but if a user has no way to guarantee a cipher being "well used," there is no reason for a user to consider an OTP strong at all.
It does seem convenient for NSA that a potentially breakable cipher continues to be described by crypto authorities as absolutely "unbreakable."
www.ciphersbyritter.com/GLOSSARY.HTM#NSAThe OTP or one time pad is commonly held up as the one example of an unbreakable cipher. Yet NSA has clearly described breaking the VENONA cipher, which used an OTP, during the Cold War. It is argued that VENONA was "poorly used," but if a user has no way to guarantee a cipher being "well used," there is no reason for a user to consider an OTP strong at all.
It does seem convenient for NSA that a potentially breakable cipher continues to be described by crypto authorities as absolutely "unbreakable."
Quote
At least two professional, fielded systems which include OTP ciphering have been broken in practice by the NSA. The most famous is VENONA, which has its own pages at http://www.nsa.gov/docs/venona/. VENONA traffic occurred between the Russian KGB or GRU and their agents in the United States from 1939 to 1946. A different OTP system break apparently was described in: "The American Solution of a German One-Time-Pad Cryptographic System," Cryptologia XXIV(4): 324-332. These were real, life-and-death OTP systems, and one consequence of the security failure caused by VENONA was the death by execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Stronger testimony can scarcely exist about the potential weakness of OTP systems. And these two systems are just the ones NSA has told us about.
www.ciphersbyritter.com/GLOSSARY.HTM#OneTimePad Quote
If you want to wallow in defeatism, fine.
No, I'm not. What I proposed I already expressed:
1. Alternative Internet (could be decentralized WiFi router based).
2. New system of encryption of messages over the network - private cryptography where the ciphers are unknown to the Secret Government.
3. Arms. You better get yourself a gun in the world that's coming.
Great to hear! All those all ideas are something I can support.
I think we cripple ourselves by presuming that the enemy has every advantage and therefore anything we don't fully understand must be a part of the NSA's sinister plan to enslave humanity.
Quote
You think that after SHA 256 being public for how long that not a single person on the planet has been able to figure out some secret cipher? That's VERY unlikely....
It's been eternity before the man invented the wheel. Don't you find strage the fact that the ants to this day haven't done it yet?
Yup....
I know they are present. Why do they hide like cockroaches?
It is accepted that cockroaches have been around for at least hundreds of thousands of years in basically their present form. Are you calling Satoshi a cockroach?
Well why not! After all, even though Bitcoin is open source, it is still hidden to 99% of the people who don't have a clue about programming and couldn't care less, as long as it works.
It did. Just playing along.
I know they are present. Why do they hide like cockroaches?
It is accepted that cockroaches have been around for at least hundreds of thousands of years in basically their present form. Are you calling Satoshi a cockroach?
Well why not! After all, even though Bitcoin is open source, it is still hidden to 99% of the people who don't have a clue about programming and couldn't care less, as long as it works.
Quote
Furthermore nobody has stolen, or leaked to the public this weakness either?
The real power is knowledge. They have developed secret science.
You know some few thousand years ago the theorem of Pythagoras was unknown to the general public. Yet it was used by ancient secret societies. It was secret science then.
Present some proof or shut the fuck up.
And you need to stop going off your meds.
I know they are present. Why do they hide like cockroaches?
It is accepted that cockroaches have been around for at least hundreds of thousands of years in basically their present form. Are you calling Satoshi a cockroach?
Well why not! After all, even though Bitcoin is open source, it is still hidden to 99% of the people who don't have a clue about programming and couldn't care less, as long as it works.
Quote
Furthermore nobody has stolen, or leaked to the public this weakness either?
The real power is knowledge. They have developed secret science.
You know some few thousand years ago the theorem of Pythagoras was unknown to the general public. Yet it was used by ancient secret societies. It was secret science then.
I know they are present. Why do they hide like cockroaches?
It is accepted that cockroaches have been around for at least hundreds of thousands of years in basically their present form. Are you calling Satoshi a cockroach?
Quote
You think that after SHA 256 being public for how long that not a single person on the planet has been able to figure out some secret cipher? That's VERY unlikely....
It's been eternity before the man invented the wheel. Don't you find strage the fact that the ants to this day haven't done it yet?
This is good, the ants, I mean. It reminds us that a thousand years ago, people had all the raw materials and the manual dexterity to invent and use the electric motor. Yet they didn't. Why not? Because they SIMPLY DIDN'T THINK ALONG THOSE LINES !
Now we have been given Bitcoin, by a few thinkers who thought along slightly different lines in slightly different ways.
Forget the less important thing about Bitcoin... the money part. Rather, let's all turn our minds to the KIND of innovation that Bitcoin reveals. If we apply this new kind of innovating, we just might be able to free ourselves from all oppression, including that of having to pay taxes just to trade our labor and skill for food, clothing and shelter. This is the example that Bitcoin shows us.
Quote
"Here is how the lock works, but you still can't unlock it without the key."
I know what public-key encryption scheme is. What I'm telling is that those who created the chipher in the first place have the reverse algorithm that doesn't require the private key to decrypt the message.
Give me an example of the type of evidence that it would take for you to change your mind.
Quote
"Here is how the lock works, but you still can't unlock it without the key."
What I'm telling is that those who created the chipher in the first place have the reverse algorithm that doesn't require the private key to decrypt the message.
Highly unlikely but one can never prove it isn't true.
Still while we may not be able to prove it isn't true, you have no way of knowing it is, so claiming you know they know is just bullshit right?
Jump to: