Topic: Why Gavin is so desperate about his fork? Is he hiding something? - page 2. (Read 18486 times)

Well, so there's your answer. He would respond vigorously to the attack by throwing anti-war quotes at them.

Until someone decided a phrase in the quote is hate speech, and then he'd apologize.

"plague-spot of civilization"? That's a micro-aggression. You know, I think plague victims have been shunned from polite society long enough. It's time to welcome those with the plague among us. There's nothing dangerous about the plague. Plagueophobia is the real danger.

The worst outcrop of herd life [is] the military system, which I abhor.  That a man can take pleasure in marching in fours to the strains of a band is enough to make me despise him.  He has only been given his big brain by mistake; unprotected spinal marrow was all he needed.  This plague-spot of civilization ought to be abolished with all possible speed.  Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism - how passionately I hate them!  How vile and despicable war seems to me!  I would rather be hacked in pieces than take part in such an abominable business. Einstein

And so you would fight the collective on your own, to prove that collectivists are fools, and would happily accept injury or death? I don't think you actually would. It would be a foolish thing to do.

I actually agree with you on this. My current support for the FN is strategic against the most dangerous fools of the moment. It's a shame that individualists have done nothing to counter the clear Jihadist threat. On the contrary, I've heard far too many people who claim to be individualists make excuses for Jihadists, or claim that Muslims were not responsible for attacks (like those of September 11) at all. Worst of all is that some people who claim to be individualists assert that Islam is compatible with individual liberty, when even those with minimal knowledge of Islam know that Islam means submission. To believe that individual liberty is compatible to total submission requires an amazing ability to believe bullshit.

One of the first things required for individualists to push back against the Jihadist threat is to be able to speak openly and honestly about Islam, its foundation and its beliefs. Such speech has been criminalized in much of the world. Even if it's not criminal, everyone knows there is an effective death penalty which will be carried out by Jihadists. The Front National says some of the inconvenient truths about Islam, while the "mainstream" parties parrot comforting lies.

Of course, the pseudonymity and censorship-resistance of cryptocurrencies could provide a way to engage in such speech without risking one's head (either figuratively in the case of legal consequences or very very literally in the obvious sense). Why isn't anyone using them for this purpose? Why instead do so many in this space make excuses for Jihadists and demonize those who speak out against Jihadists?

My answer is simply that the world has gone mad. Most of the people who claim to be "individualists" are simply a different kind of collectivist. They want to signal that they believe the "right things" -- the beliefs of their tribe -- "Islam is peace." "Terrorism is always blowback or false flags." "Jihad means internal struggle." "2+2=5." "Freedom is slavery." "Liberty is submission."

No. Only fools would.

If overwhelmingly attacked by a collective, presumably you would just accept the attack?

Political fetishism is for fools; fools that would accept their own injury or death on the basis of "perfect politics". Perfect politics is whatever works out best for me IMO. That's real individualism.

All collectivists are fools.

This applies even moreso to the Ummah. Jihadis are the most "miserable fools," as are those who take pride in following the ravings of a violent illiterate 7th century lunatic. It's sad how many people outside the Dar al-Islam defend the Ummah; people who should know better.

LOL yes. A national identity. That's the mentality of you collectivists (National Socialists / Socialist Nationalists):

“The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.” Arthur Schopenhauer

I don't know if the Front National will "deal with" the problem or not, or if what they do will be effective. I wouldn't be surprised if they went out of their way to prove they're not "racist" if they ever do get to power. I wasn't claiming the FN will "deal with it." My claim was simply that the other "mainstream" parties definitely will not "deal with it." We know this for a fact because they've had decades and they still deny there is a problem. A year that started with the false "Je suis Charlie" claims is ending with the importation of over a million refugees who are happy about the Charlie Hebdo massacre.

I agree with your last paragraph, but I'm not sure how it applies to the Jihad problem. I wish I did. Maybe you have some ideas you can share?

While I'm not convinced about voting FN (or voting at all) as a strategy, the corporate media's reaction to the result is telling. "France in shock" seems to be the general sentiment, which is clearly not the truth when a working majority of French people support FN right now. The usual hypocrisy from these propagandists: representative democracy, providing you vote for the right candidate.

Le Marxist Media is having an extra large Sad today!





Quelle horreur!   

FN seeks to preserve the French national identity; the Socialists want to destroy it the name of cultural Marxism.

You managed to miss that distinction as you were painting the majority of French voters with your extra-broad Hitler brush.

How did you manage to become as out-of-touch as Hollande and Sarko?  That's no easy feat!   

The Front National aren't going to stop any terrorist attacks using immigration policy. It's really that simple, and so your claims the organisation will "deal with it" are not credible.

If there is an attack on the free will of a region of people, the answer is not a deterioration of free-will. The answer should be to strengthen freedom. Reject all political power, including those who seek political power through violent means (as well as those that attained or maintain it that way). Cryptography will govern in the end (or nature will take the reins again).

Meh this is a socialist german melted-crack-pot you are interacting with. Anarchist or whatever.


Meanwhile:



Man i'm enjoying the show here, TV channels and their reporters are all about to commit suicide or something.
Quick hide your kids hide your wives.. We are back in 1939!

It's definitely a good result. There's still the run-offs next Sunday though. I imagine the real collectivists will go after the FN full force. Hopefully the FN will pull it off though. I think the election in 2017 is probably more important. A lot can happen between now and then.

For those of you afraid of the FN, there's an easy way to stop their rise. Admit you have a problem with a Jihad-friendly segment of your population. And after admitting it fucking deal with it. Your refusal to even admit it, much less deal with it, for decades leaves me with no sympathy for you.

Wow! The Judean Collectivist Peoples Front just destroyed the Collectivist Peoples Front of Judea?

Fantastic!

Collectivists?  Nope, FN just destroyed the Socialist Party.  Do you even read the articles or just look at the pretty pictures?

From the comfort of your armchair, it's easy to call 40% of French voters Nazis.  I'd like to see you say something so offensive to them in person.

It's OK, I know you are just butthurt because I told you "Le Pen is going to rock the vote" and that's exactly what happened.

The youngest Le Pen grew up clubbing with her trendy hipster/black/gay/Muslim/Jew/whatever friends.

Given that, the ancient Chaplin-as-Hitler meme just looks absurd.  It's in black and white FFS.  Stop living in the old world of Great-Grandpa Jean-Marie.

The ladies have taken over the party and two large districts.  Soon they will take over the rest of France.  Some dusty film from the 30s won't stop them.

If you can't handle that fact, suicide is always a convenient option.   

Yes, Anton Hinkel knew as many cheerleaders behind him as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMIIpe-suAs

It feels great to have some of that kind of collectivists in the Bitcoin environment.

As promised...





About 40% of French voters are "cheerleaders of the Front National."

How do your words taste, now that you have to eat them?