Pages:
Author

Topic: Why I went all in on Xtrabytes. (Read 3196 times)

jr. member
Activity: 349
Merit: 2
January 26, 2018, 09:37:27 AM
#52
Do NOT buy this coin!!!!! you will lose money!!!
 
I made an account to post this, but I've been watching ANN for years.This coin has many MANY negatives. The price is being manipulated for personal gain by members of the XBY community on cryptopia. The people INCLUDE fishfish, ddelphius, and fatoshi. It's vaporware at this point and with the fake price, you will lose money. It started as a sob story, but none of it is real. Haven't you noticed that there is an unnatural BTC amount in addition to the lower volume on cryptopia...and all of the walls that control the price?

I REPEAT DO NOT INVEST IN VAPORWARE NO MATTER HOW TEMPTING IT IS. YOU CANNOT GAIN WHEN THE PRICE IS BEING MANIPULATED BY A SMALL GROUP OF INSIDERS!! I WAS THERE IN THE BEGINNING AND SEEN IT ALL, IT'S A SCAM JUST TO MAKE THE OWNERS RICH!!

please listen to me, i'm trying to save you guys from being bitconnect'd

This coin is just hype and vaporware, they lure you in with shilling and flash and dump it when the going gets rough. They don't have a working product yet either. If you look at CMC, it was pumped to 5800 satoshis (YES, 80 Cents and ONLY based on hype and shilling!) and was dumped all the way down to under 3000 while bagholders got stuck with the bill. So I repeat, pump and dump vaporware coin.

Think for a moment. have you ever considered why this coin is shilled so much when the testnet won't even be on the zoltchain and there's no proof?
jr. member
Activity: 349
Merit: 2
January 26, 2018, 08:37:45 AM
#51
Do NOT buy this coin!!!!! you will lose money!!!
 
I made an account to post this, but I've been watching ANN for years.This coin has many MANY negatives. The price is being manipulated for personal gain by members of the XBY community on cryptopia. The people INCLUDE fishfish, ddelphius, and fatoshi. It's vaporware at this point and with the fake price, you will lose money. It started as a sob story, but none of it is real. Haven't you noticed that there is an unnatural BTC amount in addition to the lower volume on cryptopia...and all of the walls that control the price?

I REPEAT DO NOT INVEST IN VAPORWARE NO MATTER HOW TEMPTING IT IS. YOU CANNOT GAIN WHEN THE PRICE IS BEING MANIPULATED BY A SMALL GROUP OF INSIDERS!! I WAS THERE IN THE BEGINNING AND SEEN IT ALL, IT'S A SCAM JUST TO MAKE THE OWNERS RICH!!

please listen to me, i'm trying to save you guys from being bitconnect'd

This coin is just hype and vaporware, they lure you in with shilling and flash and dump it when the going gets rough. They don't have a working product yet either. If you look at CMC, it was pumped to 5800 satoshis (YES, 80 Cents and ONLY based on hype and shilling!) and was dumped all the way down to under 3000 while bagholders got stuck with the bill. So I repeat, pump and dump vaporware coin.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
December 11, 2017, 03:05:27 AM
#50
I truely believe while Bitcoin will always be number one there is a need for greater security. Thats why I went all in on Xtrabytes as it seems like the only coin that solves the flaws of POW and POS (51% attack). In time that will be I believe the only thing that matters in crypto ie security. Which is why it is almost a definite top 10 project. I could be wrong but I doubt it.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-xby-ann-xtrabytes-because-the-blockchain-can-be-better-1864397


Luxcoin is a PoS/PoW hybrid too. But XBY has a lot more to offer services wise. Plus XBY is distributed much more evenly compared to Lux. So price volatility should be relatively better. Lets see where these 2 projects are after 2 yrs.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2880
Catalog Websites
August 08, 2017, 09:50:07 PM
#49
Any news about this coin?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
July 24, 2017, 10:07:24 AM
#48
It does look interesting. I am yet to jump in on it.

Where is anonymint when you need him to give an in depth analysis.

If I can get in at 200 sats I'll risk a bit on it.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
July 24, 2017, 08:12:26 AM
#47
The project looks good, but coin mining takes a long time to gain wealth, like ETH etc, but the richness of coin mining is durable, unlike other projects

Not sure i understand what you mean as we dont have mining. But one thing i do know is innovative tech always...always succeeds in the end.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
July 24, 2017, 08:10:34 AM
#46
When a coin is mentioning 70,000% increase in 4 weeks in its OP, guess what I'm doing? Smiley


I think they were trying to communicate how rapidly the coin has grown. This is a community coin don't forget so don't be too critical of the marketing. This isn't a polished ICO who asks for 5000 sats buy ins. Remember NO premine, developers simply bought along with everyone else. Fact is the price stated at 1 sat for almost no time if you go look at chart. I was one of early buyers at 30 sats and back then you couldn't give it away no one wanted it, thats the reality. Look a bit deeper guys this tech is something revolutionary I think.


I actually find the open and honest communication quite refreshing. I mean what ICO tells you its experimental and could all go wrong? When actually thats a reality for many of them. Look past all this and consider the technological step this coin might be making. Thats all that matters.




And just so people know none of the communication comes directly through the actual developer who is Hungarian with poor English and is deaf.....so expect a few communication hiccups. He did however work at one point with Peter Szabo the famous late Cryptographer with McAfee.

No disrespect. Its just sound bad.... especially for a new currency.


I dont blame you at all to think the way you do. Its just ironic  that because its so open and honest that it comes across as scammy in some way. I cant remeber a project ever developing like this before. The developer basically lost money in a scam ico.and instead of putting his plans into an ico he decided he could use this scam for initial distribution saving initial investors their money and building his project. As close followers we have found the project to be all about genuine integrity.  The coin sat on yobit for almost nothing for a week before I saw it. The developer could of bought those coins knowing he would release his plans and the price would rocket but obviously he didn't. I probbaly more than anyone bought coins cheap with very little buyers to compete with....honestly I couldnt believe my luck. Even after buying i shrilled a lot telliing people it was going to be huge but at least a week passed and still no major buying.  I dont feel bad as ive missed all the major coin rallies this year nem.eth all of them.

My point is I think the OP was trying to make claer that even though this coin started so low its not a shitty project.

Sounds like what happened with Bitbay.  Zimbeck caught in a scam ICO, and instead of abandoning the project, he worked 3 years with no dev fund to create one of the most under appreciated projects today.  I will look into xby.


I guess it's a similar starting point. But quite a big difference is Zimbeck was a big part of team when he realized he was in a scam, did he recieve any money from the scam? The developers of XBY were just small investors in a small exchange ICO sale that hooked up. Borzalom the developer just saw it as a good way to put his ideas into practice, actually now it won't have one line of code from scam, whole new concept and project they have moved onto a new coded chain.


One thing people forget is many tech developers don't actually care about money like many of these ICO teams do. Borzalom is similar to Zimbeck in that he just wants to code something great. Maybe there is some pride and desire for significance in that but money with the really genius developers isn't as big a factor as many of us think. Satoshi also I think didnt care about money, that's why he doesn't touch his stash. Borzalom has stated he wants to create something that changes and helps society....I personally think he will succeed. People will come to realize that XBY is a far better platform to build the future that the shaky flawed insecure ETH platform. Smart people should at least research this.

Zimbeck was on a team of 4 i believe and the only developer.  The funds raised were supposed to be used to bring on extra developers, but were ultimately stolen.  Still to this day he is the only developer, but the amount of work that he has accomplished is extremely impressive.  To me talented idealistic developers are the best investment you can make, as they are most likely to stick with their project despite any lulls in the market.  This is the first i'm hearing about XBY but i'll def look into it and it's history. 


You hit the nail on the head. Its the crazy developers that are passionate about the work that barely seem to give money much thought. Im basically investing in the talent and vision of Borzalom. The guy is a coding machine, going on teams feedback he just codes...and codes....and codes and doesnt stop if his house in on fire. Thats the kind of developer you want on your team.
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
July 24, 2017, 04:50:28 AM
#45
The project looks good, but coin mining takes a long time to gain wealth, like ETH etc, but the richness of coin mining is durable, unlike other projects
sr. member
Activity: 659
Merit: 250
July 24, 2017, 04:45:35 AM
#44
Extrabytes is not yet awaken, but when it does it will be very valuable. Its uses is not yet realize as of now. In addition it has a limited supply also.I think it is still in the accumulation stage.
It was still undervalued in market only those who knows it potential were accumulating big amounts so if its ready and seen in market the price would be unpredictable. I got to visit the thread now because im curious on the OP post why he do all in.
copper member
Activity: 672
Merit: 270
July 24, 2017, 04:23:50 AM
#43
We need to be careful in investing in some altcoins out there specially if that coin is not popular or not well known by most of the bitcoin or crypto users because there is a lot of pump and dump coin and based on the price chart of that coin, it shows that it pumps from a very low single digit satoshi price into an average of 3 digit price satoshi. I think it is not a good idea to go all in unless you really know what you are doing and you are sure that the team behind that coin are good people.
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 269
July 24, 2017, 04:10:48 AM
#42
Extrabytes is not yet awaken, but when it does it will be very valuable. Its uses is not yet realize as of now. In addition it has a limited supply also.I think it is still in the accumulation stage.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
July 24, 2017, 02:46:13 AM
#41
When a coin is mentioning 70,000% increase in 4 weeks in its OP, guess what I'm doing? Smiley


I think they were trying to communicate how rapidly the coin has grown. This is a community coin don't forget so don't be too critical of the marketing. This isn't a polished ICO who asks for 5000 sats buy ins. Remember NO premine, developers simply bought along with everyone else. Fact is the price stated at 1 sat for almost no time if you go look at chart. I was one of early buyers at 30 sats and back then you couldn't give it away no one wanted it, thats the reality. Look a bit deeper guys this tech is something revolutionary I think.


I actually find the open and honest communication quite refreshing. I mean what ICO tells you its experimental and could all go wrong? When actually thats a reality for many of them. Look past all this and consider the technological step this coin might be making. Thats all that matters.




And just so people know none of the communication comes directly through the actual developer who is Hungarian with poor English and is deaf.....so expect a few communication hiccups. He did however work at one point with Peter Szabo the famous late Cryptographer with McAfee.

No disrespect. Its just sound bad.... especially for a new currency.


I dont blame you at all to think the way you do. Its just ironic  that because its so open and honest that it comes across as scammy in some way. I cant remeber a project ever developing like this before. The developer basically lost money in a scam ico.and instead of putting his plans into an ico he decided he could use this scam for initial distribution saving initial investors their money and building his project. As close followers we have found the project to be all about genuine integrity.  The coin sat on yobit for almost nothing for a week before I saw it. The developer could of bought those coins knowing he would release his plans and the price would rocket but obviously he didn't. I probbaly more than anyone bought coins cheap with very little buyers to compete with....honestly I couldnt believe my luck. Even after buying i shrilled a lot telliing people it was going to be huge but at least a week passed and still no major buying.  I dont feel bad as ive missed all the major coin rallies this year nem.eth all of them.

My point is I think the OP was trying to make claer that even though this coin started so low its not a shitty project.

Sounds like what happened with Bitbay.  Zimbeck caught in a scam ICO, and instead of abandoning the project, he worked 3 years with no dev fund to create one of the most under appreciated projects today.  I will look into xby.


I guess it's a similar starting point. But quite a big difference is Zimbeck was a big part of team when he realized he was in a scam, did he recieve any money from the scam? The developers of XBY were just small investors in a small exchange ICO sale that hooked up. Borzalom the developer just saw it as a good way to put his ideas into practice, actually now it won't have one line of code from scam, whole new concept and project they have moved onto a new coded chain.


One thing people forget is many tech developers don't actually care about money like many of these ICO teams do. Borzalom is similar to Zimbeck in that he just wants to code something great. Maybe there is some pride and desire for significance in that but money with the really genius developers isn't as big a factor as many of us think. Satoshi also I think didnt care about money, that's why he doesn't touch his stash. Borzalom has stated he wants to create something that changes and helps society....I personally think he will succeed. People will come to realize that XBY is a far better platform to build the future that the shaky flawed insecure ETH platform. Smart people should at least research this.
Satoshi didnt care about money
Gave himself 1/21 of the total BTC supply

CCR must be paying you in XBY to constantly shill on here

Haha riiiiight....guy spends god knows how many hours working on a project and "gives" himself 1 million coins that were worth so much at the time.  How exactly did he give them to himself again?  Was it a premine?

Hasn't even touched his billion dollars worth of coin.  Greedy bastard is probably waiting until they hit a trillion Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
July 24, 2017, 02:37:54 AM
#40
When a coin is mentioning 70,000% increase in 4 weeks in its OP, guess what I'm doing? Smiley


I think they were trying to communicate how rapidly the coin has grown. This is a community coin don't forget so don't be too critical of the marketing. This isn't a polished ICO who asks for 5000 sats buy ins. Remember NO premine, developers simply bought along with everyone else. Fact is the price stated at 1 sat for almost no time if you go look at chart. I was one of early buyers at 30 sats and back then you couldn't give it away no one wanted it, thats the reality. Look a bit deeper guys this tech is something revolutionary I think.


I actually find the open and honest communication quite refreshing. I mean what ICO tells you its experimental and could all go wrong? When actually thats a reality for many of them. Look past all this and consider the technological step this coin might be making. Thats all that matters.




And just so people know none of the communication comes directly through the actual developer who is Hungarian with poor English and is deaf.....so expect a few communication hiccups. He did however work at one point with Peter Szabo the famous late Cryptographer with McAfee.

No disrespect. Its just sound bad.... especially for a new currency.


I dont blame you at all to think the way you do. Its just ironic  that because its so open and honest that it comes across as scammy in some way. I cant remeber a project ever developing like this before. The developer basically lost money in a scam ico.and instead of putting his plans into an ico he decided he could use this scam for initial distribution saving initial investors their money and building his project. As close followers we have found the project to be all about genuine integrity.  The coin sat on yobit for almost nothing for a week before I saw it. The developer could of bought those coins knowing he would release his plans and the price would rocket but obviously he didn't. I probbaly more than anyone bought coins cheap with very little buyers to compete with....honestly I couldnt believe my luck. Even after buying i shrilled a lot telliing people it was going to be huge but at least a week passed and still no major buying.  I dont feel bad as ive missed all the major coin rallies this year nem.eth all of them.

My point is I think the OP was trying to make claer that even though this coin started so low its not a shitty project.

Sounds like what happened with Bitbay.  Zimbeck caught in a scam ICO, and instead of abandoning the project, he worked 3 years with no dev fund to create one of the most under appreciated projects today.  I will look into xby.


I guess it's a similar starting point. But quite a big difference is Zimbeck was a big part of team when he realized he was in a scam, did he recieve any money from the scam? The developers of XBY were just small investors in a small exchange ICO sale that hooked up. Borzalom the developer just saw it as a good way to put his ideas into practice, actually now it won't have one line of code from scam, whole new concept and project they have moved onto a new coded chain.


One thing people forget is many tech developers don't actually care about money like many of these ICO teams do. Borzalom is similar to Zimbeck in that he just wants to code something great. Maybe there is some pride and desire for significance in that but money with the really genius developers isn't as big a factor as many of us think. Satoshi also I think didnt care about money, that's why he doesn't touch his stash. Borzalom has stated he wants to create something that changes and helps society....I personally think he will succeed. People will come to realize that XBY is a far better platform to build the future that the shaky flawed insecure ETH platform. Smart people should at least research this.

Zimbeck was on a team of 4 i believe and the only developer.  The funds raised were supposed to be used to bring on extra developers, but were ultimately stolen.  Still to this day he is the only developer, but the amount of work that he has accomplished is extremely impressive.  To me talented idealistic developers are the best investment you can make, as they are most likely to stick with their project despite any lulls in the market.  This is the first i'm hearing about XBY but i'll def look into it and it's history. 
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
July 24, 2017, 12:07:26 AM
#39
And hasn't touched it genius. Would you do that?


So ironic by the way on shilling for CCR comment as I've been his biggest critic. He's inexperienced in running a community but he'll be fine and the tech is BORZ baby anyway. Once the core is done we will see lots of developers choosing it I believe.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
July 24, 2017, 12:04:33 AM
#38
When a coin is mentioning 70,000% increase in 4 weeks in its OP, guess what I'm doing? Smiley


I think they were trying to communicate how rapidly the coin has grown. This is a community coin don't forget so don't be too critical of the marketing. This isn't a polished ICO who asks for 5000 sats buy ins. Remember NO premine, developers simply bought along with everyone else. Fact is the price stated at 1 sat for almost no time if you go look at chart. I was one of early buyers at 30 sats and back then you couldn't give it away no one wanted it, thats the reality. Look a bit deeper guys this tech is something revolutionary I think.


I actually find the open and honest communication quite refreshing. I mean what ICO tells you its experimental and could all go wrong? When actually thats a reality for many of them. Look past all this and consider the technological step this coin might be making. Thats all that matters.




And just so people know none of the communication comes directly through the actual developer who is Hungarian with poor English and is deaf.....so expect a few communication hiccups. He did however work at one point with Peter Szabo the famous late Cryptographer with McAfee.

No disrespect. Its just sound bad.... especially for a new currency.


I dont blame you at all to think the way you do. Its just ironic  that because its so open and honest that it comes across as scammy in some way. I cant remeber a project ever developing like this before. The developer basically lost money in a scam ico.and instead of putting his plans into an ico he decided he could use this scam for initial distribution saving initial investors their money and building his project. As close followers we have found the project to be all about genuine integrity.  The coin sat on yobit for almost nothing for a week before I saw it. The developer could of bought those coins knowing he would release his plans and the price would rocket but obviously he didn't. I probbaly more than anyone bought coins cheap with very little buyers to compete with....honestly I couldnt believe my luck. Even after buying i shrilled a lot telliing people it was going to be huge but at least a week passed and still no major buying.  I dont feel bad as ive missed all the major coin rallies this year nem.eth all of them.

My point is I think the OP was trying to make claer that even though this coin started so low its not a shitty project.

Sounds like what happened with Bitbay.  Zimbeck caught in a scam ICO, and instead of abandoning the project, he worked 3 years with no dev fund to create one of the most under appreciated projects today.  I will look into xby.


I guess it's a similar starting point. But quite a big difference is Zimbeck was a big part of team when he realized he was in a scam, did he recieve any money from the scam? The developers of XBY were just small investors in a small exchange ICO sale that hooked up. Borzalom the developer just saw it as a good way to put his ideas into practice, actually now it won't have one line of code from scam, whole new concept and project they have moved onto a new coded chain.


One thing people forget is many tech developers don't actually care about money like many of these ICO teams do. Borzalom is similar to Zimbeck in that he just wants to code something great. Maybe there is some pride and desire for significance in that but money with the really genius developers isn't as big a factor as many of us think. Satoshi also I think didnt care about money, that's why he doesn't touch his stash. Borzalom has stated he wants to create something that changes and helps society....I personally think he will succeed. People will come to realize that XBY is a far better platform to build the future that the shaky flawed insecure ETH platform. Smart people should at least research this.
Satoshi didnt care about money
Gave himself 1/21 of the total BTC supply

CCR must be paying you in XBY to constantly shill on here
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
July 23, 2017, 11:54:55 PM
#37
When a coin is mentioning 70,000% increase in 4 weeks in its OP, guess what I'm doing? Smiley


I think they were trying to communicate how rapidly the coin has grown. This is a community coin don't forget so don't be too critical of the marketing. This isn't a polished ICO who asks for 5000 sats buy ins. Remember NO premine, developers simply bought along with everyone else. Fact is the price stated at 1 sat for almost no time if you go look at chart. I was one of early buyers at 30 sats and back then you couldn't give it away no one wanted it, thats the reality. Look a bit deeper guys this tech is something revolutionary I think.


I actually find the open and honest communication quite refreshing. I mean what ICO tells you its experimental and could all go wrong? When actually thats a reality for many of them. Look past all this and consider the technological step this coin might be making. Thats all that matters.




And just so people know none of the communication comes directly through the actual developer who is Hungarian with poor English and is deaf.....so expect a few communication hiccups. He did however work at one point with Peter Szabo the famous late Cryptographer with McAfee.

No disrespect. Its just sound bad.... especially for a new currency.


I dont blame you at all to think the way you do. Its just ironic  that because its so open and honest that it comes across as scammy in some way. I cant remeber a project ever developing like this before. The developer basically lost money in a scam ico.and instead of putting his plans into an ico he decided he could use this scam for initial distribution saving initial investors their money and building his project. As close followers we have found the project to be all about genuine integrity.  The coin sat on yobit for almost nothing for a week before I saw it. The developer could of bought those coins knowing he would release his plans and the price would rocket but obviously he didn't. I probbaly more than anyone bought coins cheap with very little buyers to compete with....honestly I couldnt believe my luck. Even after buying i shrilled a lot telliing people it was going to be huge but at least a week passed and still no major buying.  I dont feel bad as ive missed all the major coin rallies this year nem.eth all of them.

My point is I think the OP was trying to make claer that even though this coin started so low its not a shitty project.

Sounds like what happened with Bitbay.  Zimbeck caught in a scam ICO, and instead of abandoning the project, he worked 3 years with no dev fund to create one of the most under appreciated projects today.  I will look into xby.


I guess it's a similar starting point. But quite a big difference is Zimbeck was a big part of team when he realized he was in a scam, did he recieve any money from the scam? The developers of XBY were just small investors in a small exchange ICO sale that hooked up. Borzalom the developer just saw it as a good way to put his ideas into practice, actually now it won't have one line of code from scam, whole new concept and project they have moved onto a new coded chain.


One thing people forget is many tech developers don't actually care about money like many of these ICO teams do. Borzalom is similar to Zimbeck in that he just wants to code something great. Maybe there is some pride and desire for significance in that but money with the really genius developers isn't as big a factor as many of us think. Satoshi also I think didnt care about money, that's why he doesn't touch his stash. Borzalom has stated he wants to create something that changes and helps society....I personally think he will succeed. People will come to realize that XBY is a far better platform to build the future that the shaky flawed insecure ETH platform. Smart people should at least research this.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
July 23, 2017, 10:32:47 PM
#36
When a coin is mentioning 70,000% increase in 4 weeks in its OP, guess what I'm doing? Smiley


I think they were trying to communicate how rapidly the coin has grown. This is a community coin don't forget so don't be too critical of the marketing. This isn't a polished ICO who asks for 5000 sats buy ins. Remember NO premine, developers simply bought along with everyone else. Fact is the price stated at 1 sat for almost no time if you go look at chart. I was one of early buyers at 30 sats and back then you couldn't give it away no one wanted it, thats the reality. Look a bit deeper guys this tech is something revolutionary I think.


I actually find the open and honest communication quite refreshing. I mean what ICO tells you its experimental and could all go wrong? When actually thats a reality for many of them. Look past all this and consider the technological step this coin might be making. Thats all that matters.


And just so people know none of the communication comes directly through the actual developer who is Hungarian with poor English and is deaf.....so expect a few communication hiccups. He did however work at one point with Peter Szabo the famous late Cryptographer with McAfee.

No disrespect. Its just sound bad.... especially for a new currency.


I dont blame you at all to think the way you do. Its just ironic  that because its so open and honest that it comes across as scammy in some way. I cant remeber a project ever developing like this before. The developer basically lost money in a scam ico.and instead of putting his plans into an ico he decided he could use this scam for initial distribution saving initial investors their money and building his project. As close followers we have found the project to be all about genuine integrity.  The coin sat on yobit for almost nothing for a week before I saw it. The developer could of bought those coins knowing he would release his plans and the price would rocket but obviously he didn't. I probbaly more than anyone bought coins cheap with very little buyers to compete with....honestly I couldnt believe my luck. Even after buying i shrilled a lot telliing people it was going to be huge but at least a week passed and still no major buying.  I dont feel bad as ive missed all the major coin rallies this year nem.eth all of them.

My point is I think the OP was trying to make claer that even though this coin started so low its not a shitty project.

Sounds like what happened with Bitbay.  Zimbeck caught in a scam ICO, and instead of abandoning the project, he worked 3 years with no dev fund to create one of the most under appreciated projects today.  I will look into xby.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
July 23, 2017, 10:12:33 PM
#35
You were right! The developer just revealed 2 modules from the planned platform on GitHub. This is going to explode as a rival to ETH.

https://github.com/XtraBYtes/core/commit/8497de10fdbc44506880412c3825d486b0a5c197
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
June 16, 2017, 11:16:47 AM
#34
I'm usually pretty bullish on unique altcoins that are undervalued and have an active community. However, for some reason I just can't get myself to jump on Xtrabytes. Maybe it's because most people who talk about it just seem like shills and can't really qualify why Xtrabytes "is the future".

Who knows though, maybe it'll skyrocket and I'll look back at this post and wonder why I didn't just jump in while it was cheap. That's just the way it goes I guess lol.

So, what I gather from a brief read I gave the coin, that there are deep security issues in Bitcoin and that there are those out there that are going to control the system and take your coins?  You are under this belief even though this has not happened to date, when some of the biggest chances for it to happen have come and gone. 

You think a better option is to alter the decentralization of the coin and place its control into the hands of a limited set of nodes, becoming a centralized, governed coin.  That is, of course, your choice to do so, but that would be the moment when the coin that you speak of would leave the auspice of the crypto forum and go into another area, as it no longer meets the standards of decentralized currency.

Perhaps Paypal and Google Pay have their own forum for systems of the that nature, or even a government control website where you can gather with other like it.
 
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
June 13, 2017, 12:12:45 AM
#33
Good luck with showing that guts to invest all you got into a single coin,first and foremost the coin is not listed in any major exchange and hence i wont see it growing before getting listed in Polo or bittrex or any Chinese or Korean or Japanese exchanges.If the developers could provide a decent plan they could be listed in major exchanges but i am not sure about the fees to list the coins.Lets see whether it will be listing in the next four months.

The decision not to list on bigger exchanges like.Bittrex is the developer teams decision.  We were worried about yobit so we added cryptopia. The fact is we are in early devlopement the so its wise not to move to bigger exchanges, this project is risky, not for the weak. Trust me when the decision to move to Bittrex it wont be hard as we have had probably the most consistent vol that yobit has ever seen.

If the team wanted a pump and dump they could already be on bittrex this is a long term serious project.
Pages:
Jump to: