Pages:
Author

Topic: Why is Ethereum actually the only cryptocurrency worth GPU mining? - page 3. (Read 12084 times)

hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 576
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The price of Etheruem dropped a lot recently, the difficulty also rises fast. It might not be so profitable to mine in the future.

that is your opinion. But some miners do not agree. They are adding more hashing power to the network now.

The miners ordered the graphics cards and other components before the drop, they had to assemble the mine any way.
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 118
The price of Etheruem dropped a lot recently, the difficulty also rises fast. It might not be so profitable to mine in the future.

that is your opinion. But some miners do not agree. They are adding more hashing power to the network now.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
The price of Etheruem dropped a lot recently, the difficulty also rises fast. It might not be so profitable to mine in the future.
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 118
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.

It has HBM2, very wide bandwidth. It could be faster than the R9 390. But the price could be very high.

 The Nano/Fury line also have very wide bandwidth HBM, yet they mine SLOWER than my 2 generation old R9 290 cards do.

 There's more to the issue than just wide bandwidth.

The PoW algorithm requires more random access of the memory, so the latency is more important than the bandwidth.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.

It has HBM2, very wide bandwidth. It could be faster than the R9 390. But the price could be very high.

 The Nano/Fury line also have very wide bandwidth HBM, yet they mine SLOWER than my 2 generation old R9 290 cards do.

 There's more to the issue than just wide bandwidth.
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 118
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.

It has HBM2, very wide bandwidth. It could be faster than the R9 390. But the price could be very high.

The price of the nVidia 1080 is about $900 at the moment. When the Vega comes out, it would be the similar price.
If you choose nvidia its worth of high amount than choosing amd.. better to buy amd its cheap price than intel nvidia.

I shall wait until the end of this month to see the performance of the AMD RX 480. If it is good, I might buy some.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1030
I'm looking for free spin.
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.

It has HBM2, very wide bandwidth. It could be faster than the R9 390. But the price could be very high.

The price of the nVidia 1080 is about $900 at the moment. When the Vega comes out, it would be the similar price.
If you choose nvidia its worth of high amount than choosing amd.. better to buy amd its cheap price than intel nvidia.
full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.

It has HBM2, very wide bandwidth. It could be faster than the R9 390. But the price could be very high.

The price of the nVidia 1080 is about $900 at the moment. When the Vega comes out, it would be the similar price.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.

It has HBM2, very wide bandwidth. It could be faster than the R9 390. But the price could be very high.
full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get

The Vega was originally to be launched early next year, but that has been put forward. If there is big improvement over the 390, I might buy it.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
the real 390 competitor it's vega, the 490, not the 480, but since gpu do not scale in the right way with etheruem, i would not hold much hope for the 490 being the best card to get
sr. member
Activity: 354
Merit: 250
For the Etheruem  mining, I will not buy the RX480 if the performance is less than 390, even it consumes less power.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
I don't know anything about Eth. mining. Can a asic scrypt miner mine Eth?

 NO.

 An ASIC can only mine the specific algorythm (or algorythmS in the case of the Gridseed/SFARDS dual-algorythm chips) it was made for.

 RX 480 is listed as appx. 8/5 of the memory speed of the R9 390, as I recall.
 Should make up partly for the narrower memory bus, but probably not entirely.

 It's not really AIMED at being an R9 390 replacement though for most usage - more of a R9 280/280x/380/380x range card with some pretensions of arguing with an R9 290/390 on stuff that isn't memory-limited (It'll probably be faster on RC5-72 work than my 290s, but that's a rare "don't care at all about the memory" extreme example).


 It's still GCN supporting OpenCL, should work with current software once the drivers are updated to support the card - might not be "optimised" but should still work.
X7
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1009
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone
Ask the R3 consortium
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 501
I don't know anything about Eth. mining. Can a asic scrypt miner mine Eth?

No, gpu only.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1004
I don't know anything about Eth. mining. Can a asic scrypt miner mine Eth?
hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 576
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
You guys think we can use Rx 480 with the current mining softwares ?

RX480 has only 256 bit memory bus, that is slower than the 512 bit from the 390. The memory frequency could be higher.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
RX480 looks interesting, if only due to the HUGE memory bandwidth increase - which *hopefully* would translate to good Ethereum mining hashrate.

 Availability is going to be an issue - NVidia is already having availability issues with the GTX 1080, a "mainstream" card like the RX 480 is likely to have even worse such issue....
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 250
You guys think we can use Rx 480 with the current mining softwares ?
full member
Activity: 421
Merit: 100

buying nano right nano, is a bit stupid, too much in cost, you will pay upfront your electricity

better wait for new amd, so the nano price will be discounted heavily, i'm also sure that the new polaris or vega will match the nano in MH/w

It depends on the mining efficiency of the new AMD cards, if they are not so good, it is better to use Nano now.
Pages:
Jump to: