Why isn't this user banned yet? - page 4.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:34:24 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2015, 11:29:32 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:25:52 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2015, 11:24:07 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:22:27 AM

eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.

I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.

A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign.

Yup, and I would not want any of them (at least not the majority of them) to be in a campaign that I am running. The person in the OP isn't making nonsense posts, but it is evident that he is not really interested in the threads he is posting in.

So he can't be banned (based on your opinion). The problem is that you are not a staff member so you can't decide, however I have reported a post wrote by him.

I am saying that based on the current forum rules he probably will not be banned. It is not a requirement to be a staff member to known and be able to interpret the forum rules as they are all public as is the vast majority of the decisions and clarifications regarding the rules. Also staff members are not able to ban people, only global moderators and admins can, however for something like this it would be most likely that only admins should be banning this person (if applicable) because what he is doing most likely does not warrant a permanent ban, and only admins can hand out temp bans

Yes of course, but also an admin or global mod is a 'staff member'. I think the signature campaign should be 'managed' in some way, otherwise the forum will become really bad (due this type of users).

Wapinter

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1026

Hire me for Bounty Management

Quote from: StarofBTC on October 25, 2015, 11:05:52 AM

hmmm... seriously dont know why users post off topic posts so often.....

I think its time to make some changes in signature rules.... Dont you think?? Huh

Signature campaigners themselves check the quality of post before paying to members using their respective signature.I think they are the right people to decide because they are paying for posting after all.Other users can simply put them on ignor list if they find their posts useless or repetitve

jacee

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1025

So finally someone else noticed that guy. Oh well. I had yo report that account a while a go but then I didn't because I though somehow it's a bit constructive. But now looking af his posts, I see the guy is making a lot of nonsense around. I vote for the guy to be banned and be out of the campaign he is in right now.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2015, 11:29:32 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:25:52 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2015, 11:24:07 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:22:27 AM

eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.

I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.

A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign.

Yup, and I would not want any of them (at least not the majority of them) to be in a campaign that I am running. The person in the OP isn't making nonsense posts, but it is evident that he is not really interested in the threads he is posting in.

So he can't be banned (based on your opinion). The problem is that you are not a staff member so you can't decide, however I have reported a post wrote by him.

I am saying that based on the current forum rules he probably will not be banned. It is not a requirement to be a staff member to known and be able to interpret the forum rules as they are all public as is the vast majority of the decisions and clarifications regarding the rules. Also staff members are not able to ban people, only global moderators and admins can, however for something like this it would be most likely that only admins should be banning this person (if applicable) because what he is doing most likely does not warrant a permanent ban, and only admins can hand out temp bans

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:25:52 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2015, 11:24:07 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:22:27 AM

eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.

I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.

A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign.

Yup, and I would not want any of them (at least not the majority of them) to be in a campaign that I am running. The person in the OP isn't making nonsense posts, but it is evident that he is not really interested in the threads he is posting in.

So he can't be banned (based on your opinion). The problem is that you are not a staff member so you can't decide, however I have reported a post wrote by him.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2015, 11:24:07 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:22:27 AM

eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.

I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.

A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign.

Yup, and I would not want any of them (at least not the majority of them) to be in a campaign that I am running. The person in the OP isn't making nonsense posts, but it is evident that he is not really interested in the threads he is posting in.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: Quickseller on October 25, 2015, 11:22:27 AM

eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.

I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.

A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

Quote from: monbux on October 25, 2015, 10:42:45 AM

melisande
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/melisande-365124

Please, just look over his/her post history. I see his posts everywhere. Some don't make sense at all while others are obviously posted just to boost the post count. A lot of the times, he/she asks useless questions that have already been answered with no interest in the actual product/service being offered.

So... will this user be banned, or at least receive a warning?

P.S. I know I have am wearing a signature as well but mine is a fixed-payment signature.

Have you reported the 'most spammy' post of melisande through the report to moderator button?

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.

I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.

ajareselde

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin

Quote from: StarofBTC on October 25, 2015, 11:05:52 AM

hmmm... seriously dont know why users post off topic posts so often.....
I think its time to make some changes in signature rules.... Dont you think?? Huh

Campaigns have good rules, but it's managing them that seams to be the problem with some of them. imho, large campaigns should hire some extra help
to prune the bad posters from the good ones, especially before making payouts to participants.

monbux

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1029

I've just posted on the bit-x signature thread and PM'd marco. I usually just ignore these extreme-spammers but this one is posting on every thread I see... Very annoying.

StarofBTC

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 528

hmmm... seriously dont know why users post off topic posts so often.....

I think its time to make some changes in signature rules.... Dont you think?? Huh

ajareselde

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin

PM marcotheminer about him, i'm sure he will look into it. I usually just use report to mod and describe whats the issue about, but many times
it goes with them having different opinion than me :/

monbux

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1029

melisande
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/melisande-365124

Please, just look over his/her post history. I see his posts everywhere. Some don't make sense at all while others are obviously posted just to boost the post count. A lot of the times, he/she asks useless questions that have already been answered with no interest in the actual product/service being offered.

So... will this user be banned, or at least receive a warning?

P.S. I know I have am wearing a signature as well but mine is a fixed-payment signature.

Topic: Why isn't this user banned yet? - page 4. (Read 2735 times)