I consider it part of the growth of ICO, and the positive impact is that people are increasingly aware that Crypto is the solution for the future.
The project seems to have failed, but there are still projects that focus on developing it for the future.
Topic: Why new Projects? - page 6. (Read 1037 times)
that means there are still around 20% that are running and are likely to succeed and that is the reason I am still here, which is to look for the 20%, although it might be very difficult because I have to look for a lot of bad projects but I don't think that's a good reason to give up and I hope everyone also thinks so that crypto, ICO and other projects will continue to exist
I do not understand why people make similar projects already existing and known. such teams are immediately doomed to defeat and they have little chance of success, they are almost there. It would be better to come up with new algorithms and solutions to existing problems in crypto.
I keep wondering why new projects are being introduced into the cryptocurrency economy and we all will agree that about 80% of these new projects either don't do well or exits as scam. I know that bounty hunters especially benefits from the introduction of a new project because it's 90% sure to run a bounty program.
But what if the new projects stopped being introduced for us to focus on the thousands of projects that is already in the crypto space and individuals or teams that genuinely wants to make a change can instead either buy all these failing projects and work on them or offer to partner with the teams of the failing projects in a bid to recreate. I mean they could still run airdrops and bounty programs again to reintroduce their projects. Ain't nothing wrong with that right?
Just thinking aloud, don't know the repercussion of this idea, but back me up if it makes any sense
we need to understand some things because all the new projects are not been worthless there are some good products also being possibly happen in this time we need to appreciate and accept it then only it will be that economic changes at the end we don't know about the future so we need to accept everything if it was good. But what if the new projects stopped being introduced for us to focus on the thousands of projects that is already in the crypto space and individuals or teams that genuinely wants to make a change can instead either buy all these failing projects and work on them or offer to partner with the teams of the failing projects in a bid to recreate. I mean they could still run airdrops and bounty programs again to reintroduce their projects. Ain't nothing wrong with that right?
Just thinking aloud, don't know the repercussion of this idea, but back me up if it makes any sense
Thanks for this. If people can stop and ponder, this crypto space will be a great place for all. New projects are just too many these days.
In real economy a big percentage of startups fail as well, so it is nothing wrong with many new projects on the market. Competition will make the best ones to succeed only and the market will validate them.
yes, there is nothing wrong with the idea that you have thought, but I think it will have an impact when offering it to re-run projects that have experienced this failure, even the bounty hunters seem reluctant to return to participating in the project because they already know the previous reputation has failed when it first appeared.
but not all projects will be like that and there are still some good projects that can provide results for us, so we must be good at choosing the right one.more and more new projects are emerging so we have to be good at choosing, because not all are good.
and if the team can run well the project will probably succeed.
I keep wondering why new projects are being introduced into the cryptocurrency economy and we all will agree that about 80% of these new projects either don't do well or exits as scam. I know that bounty hunters especially benefits from the introduction of a new project because it's 90% sure to run a bounty program.
But what if the new projects stopped being introduced for us to focus on the thousands of projects that is already in the crypto space and individuals or teams that genuinely wants to make a change can instead either buy all these failing projects and work on them or offer to partner with the teams of the failing projects in a bid to recreate. I mean they could still run airdrops and bounty programs again to reintroduce their projects. Ain't nothing wrong with that right?
Just thinking aloud, don't know the repercussion of this idea, but back me up if it makes any sense
the success is important here because the existing currencies also had no development from the market that's why the new projects also important to play an important role if it was successful then I surely say it has used place and fat here. But what if the new projects stopped being introduced for us to focus on the thousands of projects that is already in the crypto space and individuals or teams that genuinely wants to make a change can instead either buy all these failing projects and work on them or offer to partner with the teams of the failing projects in a bid to recreate. I mean they could still run airdrops and bounty programs again to reintroduce their projects. Ain't nothing wrong with that right?
Just thinking aloud, don't know the repercussion of this idea, but back me up if it makes any sense
yes, there is nothing wrong with the idea that you have thought, but I think it will have an impact when offering it to re-run projects that have experienced this failure, even the bounty hunters seem reluctant to return to participating in the project because they already know the previous reputation has failed when it first appeared.
Ethereum was created in order to bring more opportunities in the crypto space, many blockchain 3.0 were created in order to offer high TPS etc. So every genuine upcoming project is meant to solve a pressing need.
In building a project, it must pass very mature considerations and of course need a team that works in it, so with the idea of buying a number of failed projects then we turn it on again by giving a new program which is a wrong idea because everyone has another running program of course we have to master the system.
Why release new projects, it may be necessary to improve existing ones? And after improvements, if necessary, to carry out a bounty campaign.
they just want to build a new sector to get more money. if there is development of the old project it's better, but if it's the same, it won't be anything for the next development. because the market is the one who will judge, where the competing projects in the market are the ones who will survive. I think we need more new projects to advance in crypto space, I believe we still need more heights to reach and new projects is the solution ,better security is needed and more better advanced projects excluding the copycats
Why release new projects, it may be necessary to improve existing ones? And after improvements, if necessary, to carry out a bounty campaign. 
many ico projects are coming out but be careful because most ico releases are also scams with legit but few just because before many ico projects are coming because they want to share the good opportunity of their project and if what are the benefits they get from using their project but not all the ico projects are good so sometimes most icos are becoming unsuccessful because their projects are bad or do not satisfy for investors there are also beautiful projects but it does not reach their hardcap but softcap only but it's good not to lose their hard work in investing in their projects.
The result of the scam from many projects was that they were not able to develop and were not accepted by the community so that the project had no progress making it incompatible with the scheduled roadmap.
It is normal that new projects comes up every year and new projects released now are thos project that have been wait for the right time to release.They wait for the market to rise because they know that the project has more chance to succeed ,as investors will go back on cryptocurrency their project will be one of the investors to see.That is my views on the new projects now.
New projects come every day, technology is developing, and when the blockchain is always not enterprising, it will be replaced by new technology sooner or later, I think new projects are needed. I am referring to the technology that really changes the blockchain pattern.
It will be replaced by many ambitious one that wanted to be more useful and promise to deliver, new projects will keep showing up because developers mindsets always looking for possible changes and opportunities to a much wider venues, new projects are keep finding ways to developed system that will have real usage to help an lift the payment process, referring to the real project and not those copycat which only created to scam and take investors money. 
I think we need more new projects to advance in crypto space, I believe we still need more heights to reach and new projects is the solution ,better security is needed and more better advanced projects excluding the copycats
Don't worry, the new investor will come or they already comes to the market and they already buy many coins since the last year. And now, they only need to wait for the reverse of the price so the price can increase higher and the investor can sell their coins.
Many new projects now just use the idea from the other project, but then they modify to be different but have the same idea. We could see this in their whitepaper, they almost have a purpose why they launch the project, but the main idea will be the same from the previous project. So you need to be careful with the new project and make sure that you can choose the right project.
Why there are always new companies? Blockchain technology is fairly new and some companies want to incorporate it into their projects. The problem happens when a company really doesn't have any benefit from using blockchain technology and issuing a token or coin. So for new projects first ask yourself if that project really needs a blockchain.
New projects come every day, technology is developing, and when the blockchain is always not enterprising, it will be replaced by new technology sooner or later, I think new projects are needed. I am referring to the technology that really changes the blockchain pattern.
Jump to: