Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 19.

bitrap

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give us your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

supercointeam's point was that the 150m coins as max money was flat out wrong, and was the main provocateur of the massive dump. If there's a problem with the anon system, that's another issue, even though it was just released in it's alpha stage (no one can transfer real coins with it yet).

Busoni's OP is filled with strong accusations that give a far worse impression on the coin than is justified, and it needs to be revised to reflect this mistake.

heartastack

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 10:00:34 AM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 09:56:44 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

wow. where is logic?

You going to shoot out a one liner and duck or tell me where my logic is flawed?

You don't make sense with all that polo mod cock in your mouth.

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 10:04:59 AM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 10:02:29 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 10:00:34 AM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 09:56:44 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

wow. where is logic?

You going to shoot out a one liner and duck or tell me where my logic is flawed?

are you fucking illiterate? following again!

Fucktard. Do you know how to carry a conversation or just one liners having no substance?

are you blind? stupid fucktard is you.

is Busoni acting as a Saint or those idiots worship him as a Saint now.

after Polo listing and delisting tons of shiit coins.

is Busoni ever daring to review DRK? is DRK centralized or decentralized?

Szaja1990

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

okey i Need do withdraw my Money from poloniex , if this guy is talking bullshit and cant even apologize then goodbye your fucking exchange

chesthing

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 10:02:29 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 10:00:34 AM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 09:56:44 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

wow. where is logic?

You going to shoot out a one liner and duck or tell me where my logic is flawed?

are you fucking illiterate? following again!

Fucktard. Do you know how to carry a conversation or just one liners having no substance?

chesthing

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1000

Quote from: mistress on June 15, 2014, 10:00:40 AM

"Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give us your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin."

wake my friend, all the coins are working for anon system and now you say that poloniex doesn't like this? On what are u investing if now x11 is " cool" ? Are u joking?

He rejected CLOAK for the same reason, he is being fair. As he already explained he recently raised the bar for shitcoins and features that aren't acceptable. A centralized trust based anon system doesn't pass the laugh test because you are depending on a third party to actually transfer the coins that you sent. Enough said, a developer needs to come up with a better solution - stop supporting this ridiculous anon solution.

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 10:00:34 AM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 09:56:44 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

wow. where is logic?

You going to shoot out a one liner and duck or tell me where my logic is flawed?

are you fucking illiterate? following again!

mistress

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

"Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give us your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin."

wake up my friend, all the coins are working for anon system and now you say that poloniex doesn't like this? On what are u investing if now x11 is " cool" ? Are u joking?

chesthing

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 09:56:44 AM

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

wow. where is logic?

You going to shoot out a one liner and duck or tell me where my logic is flawed?

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

is Busoni acting as a Saint or those idiots worship him as a Saint now.

after Polo listing and delisting tons of shiit coins.

is Busoni ever daring to review DRK? is DRK centralized or decentralized?

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: chesthing on June 15, 2014, 09:54:01 AM

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

wow. where is logic?

chesthing

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1000

Quote from: supercointeam on June 14, 2014, 11:00:21 PM

Quote from: busoni on June 14, 2014, 03:20:32 PM

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

Quote

- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:

if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:

static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

why did not you try to contact me before for explanation

Instead of calling out Busoni for not contacting you first, why didn't you give us your explanation? Busoni doesn't owe you shit.
It doesn't even matter about the fishy 150m coins as max money, Busoni doesn't like the anon system and for good reason. A centralized trust-based system is an unacceptable way to achieve anonymous transactions. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot, the rest are just piling on to the idiots pumping this coin.

BTCFinancials InvestGroup

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: SirChiko on June 15, 2014, 09:44:19 AM

I don't see why we shouldn't trust busoni's claim when it's true, explain why was it higher value than the other one then?

Because it has jack shit to do with the max coin supply, it is so irrelevant they didnt bother changing it.

SirChiko

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

I don't see why we shouldn't trust busoni's claim when it's true, explain why was it higher value than the other one then?

heartastack

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 15, 2014, 09:40:51 AM

check my sig

can you add 'and CLOAK'

mistress

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: lunswor on June 15, 2014, 09:38:29 AM

Give give busoni a break. All they are trying to do is to raise the level of what coins are added to their exchange

1. If SuperCoin code is fine then someone should pop up and show the code where everything is fine and then im sure busoni will get this reviewed again and withdraw his statement if nessecary.

2. Coins already added i'm sure will go through code reviews in the mean time but to review all 100+ markets and still add new coins to the exchange in one go is impossible.

Personally this exchange had a few problems in the early days and the way the dealt with that was outstanding which is the reason why they are still here today. Try to actually understand the efforts people are making to improve the crypto world instead of just criticizing.

i could agree with u but... if u have the time to destroy a coin with a false announcement, maybe u should find the time to repair! i hate to be so rude, but it is an injustice

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

check my sig

lunswor

full member

Activity: 159

Merit: 100

Give give busoni a break. All they are trying to do is to raise the level of what coins are added to their exchange

1. If SuperCoin code is fine then someone should pop up and show the code where everything is fine and then im sure busoni will get this reviewed again and withdraw his statement if nessecary.

2. Coins already added i'm sure will go through code reviews in the mean time but to review all 100+ markets and still add new coins to the exchange in one go is impossible.

Personally this exchange had a few problems in the early days and the way the dealt with that was outstanding which is the reason why they are still here today. Try to actually understand the efforts people are making to improve the crypto world instead of just criticizing.

mistress

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: testadimerlo on June 15, 2014, 08:53:36 AM

I suggested to the supercoin community to write an open letter to Poloniex, so all of us can read and see how unfair poloniex is. Supercoin has not nothing to hide. An open letter is the best thing, asking for official apologies or something similar

i changed my sig. Busoni, tell the truth!

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

don't ask who i am, just call me "Leifeng" Cheesy

Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 19. (Read 43236 times)