Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin - page 25. (Read 43236 times)
Poloniex is a scam... Never forget when Tristan/Busoni stole our bTC Holdings
those that were not invested will say oh just a mistake, but say busoni says the same thing on XC, it would be a bloodbath there. ofcourse im put off polo now, ive lost 8btc thanks to that move.
bosuni, how about you start a vote on poloniex, and let public people decide whether you should list supercoin?
?
?It is their exchange, not yours or anyone elses. They saw something they personally didn't like, and decided a course of action based on that.
Why they didn't is none of anyone's business really, when it comes down to it.
End of story.
it is not end of story, when a exchange owner accuses the coin of being a scam, when it is not current investors loose money. the guy runs a exchanges so anything he says is not take lightly. he must know this would have that affect. busoni making this claim is not the same as a newbie making this claim.
if the dude can run a exchange he must be able to read a code. current investors sold based on his statement. crypto world works on trust, if we can't trust polo to read codes how can we feel secure on the site.
what makes it worse is what was found in super coin is also in cinni and silkcoin. did he not vet those coin before adding. what was the motive behind this. why was the dev not contacted? why did he not contact bittrex? also crypto article were fast with that article
good call!
bosuni, how about you start a vote on poloniex, and let public people decide whether you should list supercoin??
?It is their exchange, not yours or anyone elses. They saw something they personally didn't like, and decided a course of action based on that.
Why they didn't is none of anyone's business really, when it comes down to it.
End of story.
they have the right to add the coins they want -_-
Polo wants to be a white knight in the alt scene but continues to display great hypocrisy and incompetence. I'm done with that exchange. Good luck to those blindly following these amateurs.
bosuni, how about you start a vote on poloniex, and let public people decide whether you should list supercoin??
Hasn't it already been voted in? This thread is a response to that. Now it's just a matter of sorting out the details between Polo and the SuperCoin devs. ?
i love how people that panic sold want bussoni to pay them back lol, crypto is risk and crashes happen on daily basis, people spread fud and coins crash all the time , like drk crashed xc with a tweet, do people that lost money on xc ask drk to pay them back.
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
Listen man this was no mistake this was deliberate and coming from an exchange. Polo has lost much credibility
whatever it was i learned not to trust anyone, make my own mistakes, but yes bittrex is where action is on new coins. which one will be next pump that is my concern.
I confess to you that I bought on duping without fear because same cheap FUD was carried out in XLB and I already knew about this whole history of more coins if you look, most POS coins have this line with more coins:
static const int64_t * COIN MAX_MONEY = 2000000000;
just look at BC, CINNI, XLB, SUPERCOIN, etc ...
bosuni, how about you start a vote on poloniex, and let public people decide whether you should list supercoin??
?
they can add it later if they decide, stop the drama
All we know for sure is that Polo went with the MAX_MONEY line as the headline reason to reject this coin, which has been debunked. The OP ends with this:
The anon feature of the wallet was just released a few hours ago and is in it's alpha stage, so it's not even an official feature yet.
So what's left? Code copying? I'm no programmer myself but as far as I know, every programmer "borrows" code.
I'm sure busoni is a great guy, but it's starting to smell like some back peddling in here.
it seems they do not know how Anon features works? We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.
The anon feature of the wallet was just released a few hours ago and is in it's alpha stage, so it's not even an official feature yet.
So what's left? Code copying? I'm no programmer myself but as far as I know, every programmer "borrows" code.
I'm sure busoni is a great guy, but it's starting to smell like some back peddling in here.
subscribed.
can i aks my BTC donation back in the Hacker event?
busoni you are a honest guy, i like you.
hope you can handle this tough thing correctly.
thanks
busoni you are a honest guy, i like you.
hope you can handle this tough thing correctly.
thanks
You actually can, I don't hold people to that.It is pertinent that the coin was hard forked to change the maximum supply. We have not examined all the changes made, but this may strengthen the case for the MAX_MONEY issue being negligence rather than laying the foundation for a nefarious plan. Nevertheless, the variable could have been deliberately left unchanged for the same reasons, and in any case, it indicates sloppy coding that opens the coin up to, for example, a much larger double spend attack. We're going to look into this further, but an apology may be in order for not coming to dev privately first.
There is also the issue of the anon implementation proposed, which even by the dev's admission is highly vulnerable to "cheating." I would never list a coin that relied on the honesty of people operating a mixing pool. It would be trivial for them to steal coins and impossible to prove that they had done so.
i do hope supercoin dev can communicate with you directly. but he is sleep now.
i hope you can handle this correctly.
about the cheating node, it seems XC coin and Darkcoin also has similar issues, Please check this. XC coin use Xnode, in first stage it’s also have some cheating problem. dark coin use masternode which also not a 100% safeway. Although Bitcoin survive the 51% attack several days ago.
busoni, my friend, Please think this again or wait for the Supercoin dev give your a reply later, no need to make a rush decision.
thank you very much. i will keep Support Poloniex.
i love how people that panic sold want bussoni to pay them back lol, crypto is risk and crashes happen on daily basis, people spread fud and coins crash all the time , like drk crashed xc with a tweet, do people that lost money on xc ask drk to pay them back.
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
Listen man this was no mistake this was deliberate and coming from an exchange. Polo has lost much credibility
whatever it was i learned not to trust anyone, make my own mistakes, but yes bittrex is where action is on new coins. which one will be next pump that is my concern.
another fud?
What FUD? If it turns out SuperCoin is legit, I'm not claiming any ill intent on Polo's part, just incompetence. BTW, I lost money in this too, but every investor should know to never invest any more than they can afford to lose, and that they are ultimately responsible for what they do with their money.
i love how people that panic sold want bussoni to pay them back lol, crypto is risk and crashes happen on daily basis, people spread fud and coins crash all the time , like drk crashed xc with a tweet, do people that lost money on xc ask drk to pay them back.
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
Listen man this was no mistake this was deliberate and coming from an exchange. Polo has lost much credibility
i love how people that panic sold want bussoni to pay them back lol, crypto is risk and crashes happen on daily basis, people spread fud and coins crash all the time , like drk crashed xc with a tweet, do people that lost money on xc ask drk to pay them back.
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
Listen man this was no mistake this was deliberate and coming from an exchange. Polo has lost much credibility
i love how people that panic sold want bussoni to pay them back lol, crypto is risk and crashes happen on daily basis, people spread fud and coins crash all the time , like drk crashed xc with a tweet, do people that lost money on xc ask drk to pay them back.
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
if you gamble and lose it's nobodies fault.
it's a lesson for all of us to double check facts and not make premature decisions. or trust anyone in this case no matter how reputable they are people make mistakes..
All we know for sure is that Polo went with the MAX_MONEY line as the headline reason to reject this coin, which has been debunked. The OP ends with this:
The anon feature of the wallet was just released a few hours ago and is in it's alpha stage, so it's not even an official feature yet.
So what's left? Code copying? I'm no programmer myself but as far as I know, every programmer "borrows" code.
I'm sure busoni is a great guy, but it's starting to smell like some back peddling in here.
another fud? someone does not understand what MAX_MONEY means and start to reject coins? What a retard. Anon feature just released? can you tell me how many coins have that feature? how many promised and unable to deliver? your comments made me laugh. We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.
The anon feature of the wallet was just released a few hours ago and is in it's alpha stage, so it's not even an official feature yet.
So what's left? Code copying? I'm no programmer myself but as far as I know, every programmer "borrows" code.
I'm sure busoni is a great guy, but it's starting to smell like some back peddling in here.
Jump to: