Topic: Why Same MERITED Rankers send Merits to themselves? (Read 1256 times)

Nah I don't think so. I highly doubt that the so called "rich" here in our forum continuously want to become richer in merits. Why? Because it's totally useless already. They finally reach the highest rank possible and tons of merits won't bring them farther (unless theymos introduce a new rank). Do not overthink dude, there's no collusion happening between them or whatsoever, Legendary members giving merits to each other is all legal. It just so happened that they're more knowledgeable compare to most of us thus they more appreciate the contributions of one another.

If you are a little bit jelous or really want to belong on such elite group then act like a Legendary as well. That's the only way, good luck .

Now that's the position of getting rich or getting poor comes in on bitcointalk forum. Let's say everyone is just trying so hard to be in a big position on bitcointalk. But my say is not that, am driving to the point where the rich is still wanting to be rich. If you get what I mean clearly well. Having those Merits is not bad sure it's a good thing but on the contrary where a legendary is stil rewarding a fellow legendary is my question. Which I believe am getting to have some answers Which already states that this how it is till the end.

You only have this opinion because you only have a shallow grasp of the merit system and its Implications.
What I have said has been debated several times previously and never been debunked.

The same pattern of mass shitposting naturally subsided after the 2014 bull.

Merits only legitimate purpose is preventing bot and slowing down account farming.
The real damage was done when merit was conflated with trust.
The insoluble problems that merit has created far outweigh the positives that could have been achieved by other means without all of the damage.

Your final point is also misleading.
If I have a gun and point it at your head and instruct you to remain silent then for sure you can still call out if you choose. Nothing is preventing you. There would of course be the small consideration to factor in that I will turn you head into a canoe if you dont consider my feelings on the matter.

Same with merit and merit = trust.

Support the status quo ( which the merit cyclers, self appointed DT chipmixer scammer supporters benefit from )  = merits and no trust absuse

Present undeniable evidence the status quo is gamed and dangerous and crushes free speech = merit starvation and trust abuse


If you would like further reading references before engaging in full debate regarding this then let me know.

As I have said the points I have made about the merit system are irrefutable and undeniable.
In it's current form it is a damaging cancer.

If it would have been left to simply make it harder for bots and account farmers that would have been fine.
It simply wasn't designed suitably for the purpose it was later given.
Hence why it was gamed and abused to be a tool for greed and suppression.

Like newbie, Jr members dont receive airdrop merit when the merit system is applied and they remain in Jr. But a few months later, there was a change and all members of Jr. become newbie and they must get 1 merit to become a member of Jr.

I'm not familiar with the old ranking system so don't mind if I ask this.

Based on trant's history thread, the Jr Member would only be minimum requirement to be eligible? That's starting from 30 Activity, right?

Not really. The Merits airdropped to each account were in accordance to the amount they needed to maintain their rank at the time the Merit System kicked-in (with some Hero exceptions that where airdropped 1K Merits instead of 500 Merits). A Newbie would have remained a Newbie.

We’ll always see counter-examples of one or another type. Unmerit decent posts may be skipped for whatever reason (not every "good" post is going to be merited), but one can always do something in these cases: Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source .


Yes, at the time when the Merit System was set in motion, no Merit requirements were set for Jr. Members, so 30 Activity qualified for the rank, but rendered no airdrop merits.

I stand with you. I saw some low quality post by some legendary members but still getting a lot of merits. I also saw some low ranking with High quality post but getting no merit at all.

I wonder though, didn't the Merit airdrops achieve the same thing? For example, newbie accounts instantly become Member.

It's a different case here in Bitcointalk the poor poster will get poorer in merit and the rich in quality poster will continue to be richer in merit, that's the case here in Bitcointalk so newbies need to contribute good posts.

Merit slows down the ranks alot I think so it is kinda dramatic in its effect but that was intended afaik.   I do think the system could be more liquid and so enable more merit, the ratio of decay could be changed from 50%.      The merit is totally for the post not the person exactly so whats been said is correct but I actually already do what you said because its impossible for me to give merit to every post I like or think stands out.
   So I'm very biased towards giving merit to new members, its actually a bit more dangerous to give merit to new members because it raises the chances the post is taken from an article and not original content.    I check maybe a dozen other posts from most people I give merit to, I dont have much to award so when I do I check now.   A couple times Ive given merit to someone who ends up banned and didn't even write that post themselves, so it was wasted merit then which is a major fail.
  If I get merit its very appreciated despite my rank its a compliment of course and the system does let me pass it on, its not just left unused so the OP argument is not really correct

There are many principles and ideas had been discussed since merits system launched. I believe that knowledge is virtue and ignorance is vice. However, there is no such thing as an absolute truth. I also working hard to make some progress in this forum. I have searched and learned a lot of information, shared to the forum but I did not get merits. Therefore, you may not guarantee that you have been receiving merit when you already learned and shared it here. Because many of us here may know what will you share. And it some post might you know a quality but for others, it is obsolete.

Uniqueness and creativity are the most important tool in posting in BTT.

For OP, I think it does not matter whether you send merit to your co-rank user. As long as the post has quality.

Dude what? The new merit system is undeniably the best update that Bitcointalk had. It's what made Bitcointalk actually more worth reading. If you were here in the bull market of 2017, you'd know what I mean. Back then people would just spam register accounts and grow it effortlessly through activity. Now, only the people who deserve it ranks up.

You could still freely post and share your thoughts regardless of rank and merit count.

Interesting points there. No wonder they enjoy sending each other bags of merits.

I have often thought the same about locking posts are they have merit. . However the poster should maybe have the option to modify the post if they dont mind losing the merits.
I mean you may prefer to have control over your own posts than retain the merits in some cases.

The rules shouldn't be different just because someone is Legendary. They take part in the merit system equally just like every other rank. They don't need the merits to rank up, unless a new rank is introduced (unlikely) but they award other members with sMerits, and that is what counts.   

Well said, but in other terms is there no other means the legendary members can be appreciated other than they send each other Merits. It's of no use since they are legendaries already is better to just thank them in other words. Put if other means to appreciate them will be implemented theymos will look forward to it. My own opinion...

This is the merit awarding distribution between ranks (*) for 2020 so far:

https://public.tableau.com/shared/9YT4NW63X?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link

Unfortunately, numbers will be numbers, and they do not provide context to the reasons behind by themselves ...

(*) As of current ranks. Any ranking-ups will drag all merit assignment alongside to the new rank, either as a sender or a receiver.

I believe that anyone can give other merits of they feel like or if a post is good enough for them, it's not about legendary members sending merits to another legendary member, it's all about the contribution on this forum

Once a post has been merited, then the post should be locked and can neither be deleted, nore modified.  @theymos might want to consider making that small modification to the merit system.

Ironically, the current admins of BPIP ( @ibminer and @suchmoon ) have chosen to skewer the merit ranking to include only the earned merits in their ranking system, *but* are happy enough to benefit from the merits they were initially gifted from others when the merit system was created.  It over inflates both their rank on BPIP and their egos.


Don't forget for every 250 merits you "earn" count as a vote, so 250 merits = 1 vote... 500 merits = 2 votes and so on.  Being able to gift others 50 merits at a time fast tracks their voting ability.

Let's not get off topic and speculate with ad hominem attacks

As we know editing posts is a fav of nutildahs.

Let me explain how it works to the thread starter.

Merit works like this

Merit sources give it out to each other and a few select pals on meta. The core merit cycling gang.
They then use it to give them the power to include each other on DT you need 250 earned merits
They use ensure they have enough to meet all the sig campaigns requirements
They use their self elected Dt and self awarded merits to get into chipmixer
They slather merit to their asslicker chipmixer dreamer newbies or their own alts
They merit starve any members that speaks out against the broken status quo they have gamed
They can now milk all the best rev streams
They can scam others with impunity since they control DT
They scare others from speaking out

Merit is undeniably the worst thing to happen to bitcointalk ever

It supports scammers and crushes free speech

This is all undeniable

Just look at

Merit sources, dt1, chipmixer merit top 20 fans and recipients
Then look at some of the proven scammers and dirty scum bags on DT, with bags of merit and sporting highly paid sigs and running other rev streams here.

So that is why they keep slithering each other in merit while.making sure the 250 earned merits is inclusive

Keep watching how they are begging theymos to increase this lately.

It's all totally obvious and independently verifiable.

I hope that answers your questions but if not I will be happy to explain it further.


Merit had nothing to do with post value. It is merely a tool of control and manipulation.
That may not have been the original intention but that is undeniably how it worked out.

Legit question.

I do any rank that has a good post.

Here is a newbie I did today

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-kawpowminer-v123-first-kawpow-miner-for-miners-nvidiaamd-winlinx-5246518


I gave him enough to be a junior member as I am hoping that it will promote mining that specific coin and that his program is as good as it seems.

I am mining with a few cards on that coin even though I mostly mine BTC directly with asics I do mine alt coins.

If you look at my signature you see I like alts and BTC.  So I try to promote ASICs resistant alts.