I wouldn't call centralization as little sacrifice, unless paypal allow it's user to send Bitcoin to anyone with Bitcoin address and pay merchant from our own Bitcoin wallet directly.
The whole operation will be performed by Paxos which is the owner of Paxos Gold stable coin.
If the price for adoption is that Bitcoin is going to be centralized, I'd rather bid good bye to it. Bitcoin is decentralization. Bitcoin is decentralized or else it is not Bitcoin at all. It is just either a decentralized Bitcoin or nothing at all.
But other centralized apps, sites, payment systems, businesses, etc accepting Bitcoin does not mean Bitcoin is now stripped of its decentralized nature. It does not alter Bitcoin at all. Nothing has changed in Bitcoin.
Paypal is not the only way for decentralization supporters to buy, sell, and make use of their Bitcoin.
The price of the adoption is not centralized mate cause Bitcoin has already gained adoption but if we want it to be mainstream some centralized bodies will step in.
for crypto to be mainstream a little sacrifice(centralization) will be needed
It's a big sacrifice. Bitcoin is here to
avoid centralization, it just doesn't make sense to welcome it this way.
I understand it big sacrifice if we consider what the damage the centralized organization can cause but the bond and the love crypto enthusiast had for Bitcoin is strong enough to overcome it.
I understand there are so many merchants that'll allow Bitcoin payments which is great, but I'm not sure it's going to be Bitcoin you'll be paying with. Without full control over the coins, it's just like PayPal created a virtual Bitcoin and allowed you to use it. I'm really curious to find out if the "purchases using Bitcoin" are going to be done over the blockchain or PayPal takes the BTC and gives you virtual ones.
The positive things that may come out of it is the reason why I think we need to give them a chance since the transaction will be operated through Paxos.