*sigh* this is why we can't have nice things...
Let's just end this now (the trolling doesn't interest me at all).
Topic: Why the constant push to have only the one blockchain? (Read 2897 times)
OK. How is this related with my cup of coffee I'm trying to buy?
The whole cup of coffee thing was never my main point at all but in any case I am sure that you are familiar with "vouchers" (or "coupons") for shopping, restaurants, etc. (and yes maybe even your cup of coffee).
If ppl trade vouchers what dose it mean? Thats right its a currency.
You really think ppl here would take you serious for such lack of basic knowledge?
My guess is you just want to avoid calling it "coins" as much as possible and failed terribly.
Aiya, a mom joke. Has not seen it for a while, Are JokesRUs having a sale ?
No. That was a genuine advice to stay away of the discussion if you can't contribute anything valuable. And now go, baby, go.
and you do?
Disagreeing equals " no contribution" now?
Nice, a step from calling it trolling i guess.
Aiya, a mom joke. Has not seen it for a while, Are JokesRUs having a sale ?
No. That was a genuine advice to stay away of the discussion if you can't contribute anything valuable. And now go, baby, go.
It doesn't become an altcoin if it doesn't work like a "currency" (i.e. allow for easy transfer of funds for example).
Are funds not currency?
Do you think that "houses are currency"?
Yet they are a "store of funds" and they can be "transferred" (perhaps I should have used the word *value* instead though).
LOL at your nonsense, using bitcoin blockchain to carry deeds suddenly means "houses are currency"
Also, curreny is just a medium of exchanging value. Stop making yourself looks bad. You live in China, you should know there was time when ppl use rice as currency.
OK. How is this related with my cup of coffee I'm trying to buy?
The whole cup of coffee thing was never my main point at all but in any case I am sure that you are familiar with "vouchers" (or "coupons") for shopping, restaurants, etc. (and yes maybe even your cup of coffee).
would you stop spamming new threads? or you're just an attention whore now?
He raises valid questions.
Btw, go home, baby. Your mom has called you.
Aiya, a mom joke. Has not seen it for a while, Are JokesRUs having a sale ? lol the irony in your attempt to insult.
It doesn't become an altcoin if it doesn't work like a "currency" (i.e. allow for easy transfer of funds for example).
Are funds not currency?
Do you think that "houses are currency"?
Yet they are a "store of funds" and they can be "transferred".
OK. How is this related with my cup of coffee I'm trying to buy?
You said yourself that you wouldn't be bothered with having to exchange things just to buy a cup of coffee.
Yes. I would rather use Bitcoin.
I am certainly not going to try and convince you not to use Bitcoin if it is usable for that purpose.
It doesn't become an altcoin if it doesn't work like a "currency" (i.e. allow for easy transfer of funds for example).
Are funds not currency?
Do you think that "houses are currency"?
Yet they are a "store of funds" and they can be "transferred" (perhaps I should have used the word *value* instead though).
You said yourself that you wouldn't be bothered with having to exchange things just to buy a cup of coffee.
Yes. I would rather use Bitcoin.
It doesn't become an altcoin if it doesn't work like a "currency" (i.e. allow for easy transfer of funds for example).
Are funds not currency?
If it does handle money, then it needs its own tokens (because Bitcoin tokens only exist within Bitcoin). And such it becomes an altcoin.
It doesn't become an altcoin if it doesn't work like a "currency" (i.e. allow for easy transfer of funds for example).
You said yourself that you wouldn't be bothered with having to exchange things just to buy a cup of coffee.
So, a purely informational blockchain? That's nice, but it doesn't seem to fit with everything we've been discussing so far.
It would if people didn't keep trying to "put words into my mouth" and insist I am trying to flog an altcoin.
We're talking about “not bloating Bitcoin's blockchain”. You propose to have alternate independent blockchains to alleviate it.
But Bitcoin is about money. Their tokens are meant to be currency. So, what exactly is your informational blockchain going to do if not handle money?
If it does handle money, then it needs its own tokens (because Bitcoin tokens only exist within Bitcoin). And such it becomes an altcoin.
would you stop spamming new threads? or you're just an attention whore now?
He raises valid questions.
Btw, go home, baby. Your mom has called you.
So, a purely informational blockchain? That's nice, but it doesn't seem to fit with everything we've been discussing so far.
It would if people didn't keep trying to "put words into my mouth" and insist that I am trying to flog an altcoin.
Oh really? Then go to Altcoin discussion then. You keep bringing this shit up everytime. Its borderline spamming now.
You are more than welcome to ignore this topic and stop wasting your time posting here.
would you stop spamming new threads? or you're just an attention whore now?
OK, not a sidechain. An independent blockchain.
How is an independent blockchain not an altcoin?
How is an independent blockchain not an altcoin?
If it doesn't even have a "coin" then exactly how can it be an altcoin?
So, a purely informational blockchain? That's nice, but it doesn't seem to fit with everything we've been discussing so far.
Oh really? Then go to Altcoin discussion then. You keep bringing this shit up everytime. Its borderline spamming now.
You are more than welcome to ignore this topic and stop wasting your time posting here.
How can you have consensus if different software did things differently?
Exactly why I pointed out the problem with your post.
But you're comparing it to NASA. Do you think the different NASA servers also not reach consensus? (internally, that is)
Jump to: