Topic: Why the darkcoin/dash/dashpay instamine matters - page 22. (Read 47796 times)

We're still not even at the starting point of cryptocurrency. To feel locked into something that was launched in a deceptive and misleading manner by the person or people still running it just because a millimeter or two of progress has been made on a million meter journey is silly.

There are plenty of alternatives that don't have that, er, baggage.

The block reward of nearly every coin is arbitrary. As for competing with miners, its a double-edged sword. The whole utility aspect of the coin is based entirely on the masternode network, without it, the miners would have "no value". As for IX competing with miners... hardly. There still needs to be a POW confirm for IX to work. Further, if IX fails, it defaults back to conventional POW confirms.

As for the issues Smooth described in the OP:

Numerous existing holders aren't pleased with the beginnings of the coin but its just that, beginnings. A starting point. No one expected Darkcoin to morph into what it is presently and the masternode concept wasn't even a thing back at launch. The reality of the situation is that its an unfortunate reality but one in which miners decided to continue supporting the codebase as well as buyers/sellers continuing to transact in coins. People invest for numerous reasons: utility offered, speculation, etc. The coin as it stands today isn't what it was in the beginning, not even close and it continues to innovate and branch out--part of the reason for the name change. People looking at taking a position have been able to see over the course of the year what the development team has done and certainly on a weekly, ongoing basis, heard nonstop about the instamine. People still continue to support the project because in the face of its history, it continues to offer utility and has differentiating factors that separate it from other coins. People buy into company stock all the time when IPO's float only a portion of ownership while retaining the lionshare. And on that note, there was ample opportunities for anyone if they desired to pick up coins on the cheap over a course of a few months of non-stop stagnation in price and constant dumpings.

The block reward portion of the masternode payments is not negotiated and made by the person purchasing that service (by contrast with fees). It is set by the developer in a fairly arbitrary manner, and paid by miners to whom the masternode operator provides no service (in fact InstantX competes with miners). So at best (if it is not an investment scheme), masternode operators are a commercial vendor of the developer, or a confederation of the developer along with miners.

It is certainly not the same model as mining. At best there are some vague similarities.

The very design of the two-tier approach falls on the back of the masternode network. You're paid to provide a service--at the moment, IX locking and Darksend mixing. If you freelance your time in graphic design, should you not get paid for it? For some, they could give two shits about masternodes but they are the structure of the coin and what offer DASH utility. From a price standpoint, they are an investment and an income stream--no different than mining in that regard. The difference is you're trading hardware depreciation and resale value for currency speculation (good or bad depending on direction). The fact that so many people have opted to setup masternodes tells you a lot about them believing in what the coin has to offer and they are getting a return for doing so. From a price discovery standpoint, S&D factors come into play with where an equilibrium of masternodes to justify the value of the coin, stabilizes. I don't expect you to understand.

I saw this:

https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/brs-arbitrary-output-sizes.txt - Ring Signature Blinding

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unique-ring-signatures-using-secp256k1-keys-768499

I do find it interesting that after 4 pages of attacks, not one person has even attempted to (reasonably) address smooth's points in the OP.

.... then zerocash is also a DRK killer... unless instanx is all it worked up to be.

"leads to a lot of ugly situations that zerocash WILL resolve"

FTFY

(as in its not here yet.)

Nothing was instamined, the emission curve is totally perfect and sheduled how it was meant to be.
The NSA involvement, well, sounds good - the NSA knows how to make crypto systems way better than Mr. Duffield - thank you.

Blowing the lid off - with the exception of Monero, thank you again; do you know what exception means?


Peters comment is MRL-0001 which got fixed with MRL-0004 -  a totally theoretic attack anyway :-) Unlike the Darkcoiners we aren't as arrogant to not attack our own crypto and make it better :-)
You could paste the other comments from Peter maybe?


MRL-0004 is worth reading btw, but i doubt you can understand it  - but maybe give it a try:
MRL-0004: Improving Obfuscation in the CryptoNote Protocol - https://lab.getmonero.org/pubs/MRL-0004.pdf

Around 15% of the total monero coin supply was instamined by several groups including the original dev who was removed from the project for scamming. Smooth has admitted only 5% being instamined with a optimized miner from one group that went public, the other teams are still on the loose waiting to dump coins on newcomers. They had everyone mining on a "crippled miner" while elite insiders had optimized miners. smooth is one of the original bad holder and possible the ousted original anon dev.
The nsa involvement is bad enough but the inflationary distribution model will kill this coin before the massive bloat does.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryptoNote#NSA_involvement

Blowing the lid off the CryptoNote/Bytecoin scam (with the exception of Monero)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112

Zerocash is a monero killer! RIP
Dump it now, thank me later.

Well, from what I know, there are about 2300 masternodes. As each masternode needs 1000 DRK to operate, so there are 2,300,000 DRK "frozen" (these coins can be moved only if you want to shutdown the masternode), or 44% of the currently supply (about 5,200,000).

Maybe you forgot InstantX..

A real beauty...

Edit : double loosers 

LOL

So why 2 of your devs pass hour and hour in our thread, and bashing us on reddit??

For your information thanks to them I'll never ever invest a $ in this shitcoin and speak about this to all my friends:


I hope that more and more people will see that Monero Devs have no clue, only option attack the success coin.

Edit : loosers ! 

Of course it's about the price . There are many dozens of premined/instamined/scam coins but there is no point in worrying about them because they amount to nothing. Having a "suspect" coin growing so big is of concern and worth investigating.

Conclusion to OP's topic ''why the darkcoin/dash instamine matters'' :

it doesnt matter, all that matters is the amount of work put into development of Darkcoin and its ability to actually achieve what it set
out to achieve only a year ago. The market regnonices and confirms the progress in price correction.

Please stop with these FUD threads  the price is rising way too fast because of you


Thanks retard.

(dear Mods, before you delete me, this is not off topic because this pic represents how Smooth doesn't really care about drk public launch emission, instead he cares because he is the layabout Monero core dev who submitted 3 lines of code in the last 12 months and is butthurt because a real coin is owning his thinly valed investor scam)

DARK is trying to steal the name of Dash, a Cryptonote coin with real privacy.

The reason is the Darkcoin Foundation wants to escape their poker/gambling/darkmarket past and take start marketing their HYIP to normal people.

Pushing Ponzis on Bitcoin Rich crypto-nerds for lulz and profit is one thing.  Tempting with ridiculous ROI decent folks who work hard for their money is another matter.

"It's the Next Bitcoin^TM and the Next Visa^TM all in one; get in on the Ground Floor^TM" they say.   

They are not upset about the instamine, they are upset about the price rise of DRK over these last few months.
They fear it directly undermines their own coin.