Author

Topic: Why you shouldn't buy Hashfasts new "up to 800GH/s" "product" (Read 11643 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Read the difference between the first article against HF (not from coindesk) and the article that coindesk copied from the first source a few days after:
http://www.extremetech.com/uncategorized/173772-bitcoin-asic-manufacturer-hashfast-facing-lawsuits-over-alleged-false-advertising-fluctuating-bitcoin-prices
http://www.coindesk.com/asic-manufacturer-hashfast-faces-legal-action/

And yes, it can be fined. Find the bitcoin transaction id.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #HMCDFh1YM7Dr0I2O
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Why doesn't Coindesk do better more indepth reporting on BFL, Avalon and HashFast? They all seem to get a pass on the hard questions.
For the same reason why their articles are link campaigns sometimes.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kJ3DA4DMXizwTFah

Paid for articles or advertorials?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Why doesn't Coindesk do better more indepth reporting on BFL, Avalon and HashFast? They all seem to get a pass on the hard questions.
For the same reason why their articles are link campaigns sometimes.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kJ3DA4DMXizwTFah
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Kudos to the OP for making this thread.

Hopefully others will find it and never purchase from HF again.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
this should be set as a sticky..  or a buyers beware thread up top for all the bullshit scam companies
I feel like I can't reasonably do that because I can't vet every complaint with high confidence. And I don't want to just sticky vendors who have screwed _me_, while vendors who have screwed other people don't get the sticky.




Like BFL specifically. How about we sticky the post by Dogie about fabricators?

You guys see this:

http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/

Why doesn't Coindesk do better more indepth reporting on BFL, Avalon and HashFast? They all seem to get a pass on the hard questions.
legendary
Activity: 1418
Merit: 1002
this should be set as a sticky..  or a buyers beware thread up top for all the bullshit scam companies
I feel like I can't reasonably do that because I can't vet every complaint with high confidence. And I don't want to just sticky vendors who have screwed _me_, while vendors who have screwed other people don't get the sticky.




Like BFL specifically. How about we sticky the post by Dogie about fabricators?

You guys see this:

http://www.coindesk.com/court-grants-order-freeze-hashfasts-bitcoin-wallets/
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
this should be set as a sticky..  or a buyers beware thread up top for all the bullshit scam companies
I feel like I can't reasonably do that because I can't vet every complaint with high confidence. And I don't want to just sticky vendors who have screwed _me_, while vendors who have screwed other people don't get the sticky.




Like BFL specifically. How about we sticky the post by Dogie about fabricators?
hero member
Activity: 576
Merit: 500
They are now fucking over batch 2, 3, and 4 even more by delaying another 3 months, while offering them an "upgrade". This upgrade from baby jets/sierras will only place them at the end of the line of evo orders. New customers that placed their pre-orders 1 month ago will receive their units before old customers that pre-ordered roughly 4-6 months ago. I have now asked for a full refund on all of my orders and taken a huge loss due to HashFast scamming us all. I have no idea if they will even respond to the refund email though since they have completely ignored my other emails from months ago. I am sick of dealing with these thieves and just want out of their goddamn pre-order waiting list.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy
I only mine at 2.5 GH/s http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc271/baz80/mining_zps8979a199.jpg   its better than nothing lol but its going to take me years to get the Antminer S1 I want so much
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
You might want to lend support to this idea:

Self moderated topics have the warning at the top:

Quote
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.

One thing that may be of interest to someone reading such a topic would be to know some objective marker of how many posts were deleted that they can then make their own judgements about how reliable the content in it is. A simple change like this would be helpful:


Quote
This is a self-moderated topic with 230 of 400 posts deleted. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Ok so HF cross posted a reply to my post in their self moderated thread, i guess because he was already planning of removing my answer. So:

HashFast has been selling chips for weeks, it's right on the webpage and very easy to find:
You are right.

I should have said "i had no idea that HF was actually selling chips". Only because you list something on your website it doesn't mean that you are actually selling it.

You are selling the ASIC and the IP for the board, and yet your previous customers are getting nothing at all. I'm quite sure that they would have been happy to have the ASIC and the IP of the board as well instead of void promises as usual.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
You opened my eyes. I had no idea HF was selling chips...

With gateway behind the website...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #ujuidtuy6GAAFym6
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
It seems HashFast_CL had to go home early to mom today and decided to lock the thread at

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5741703

Quote from: HashFast_CL
HashFast is working as hard as possible to build and deliver upgrade kits and MPP as fast as possible.

Our engineers and production staff work around the clock.  The idea we're resting on our laurels, or mining with customer equipment, or whatever the latest baseless FUD rumor (tropical island/hammock/mai tai) the forum dreams up, is ridiculous.

I'm sorry but that statement is total bullshit and you know it. What the fuck have you been doing for the last 6 weeks? No equipment has been shipping, no replacement BBJet units for RMA cases. No MPP for the BBJets. No Upgrade kits, except for 1 or 2 units. No Sierra units. No MPP for the Sierra units.

It's not rocket science... the chips are here and they work. The PCB has been finalized and can be produced in a few days time. You have a supplier of power supplies it seems, exclusively. CIARA can slap together over 500 units a day you claim, give or take a few loose screws in their cases.

With these facts, you should be pumping out hundreds of units every day and ship them world wide

How come nobody is getting the equipment they paid for in September 2013? What is holding you back? Seriously? How long do you think you can keep this up?

Who in their right mind will be so stupid to ever order again from HashFast with the above facts? They will be pouring their BTC into a black hole when placing an order.

Quote from: HashFast_CL

The HashFast Derangement Syndrome, where the haters spew endless negativity no matter what we do, is getting old.

If you want to talk about haters, trust me, I'm a big hater. You took my preorder BTC and did a runner with it. You have not delivered anything, except a few hundred BBJet units.

The "no matter what you do" part is funny, as you are not doing anything. You are not shipping. You are not delivering. You are not responding to support email requests. You are not responding to support phone calls. You are not responding to refund requests.

So yes, please enlighten us, other than posting about new vapourware products you are trying to pre-sell, what are you doing?


I will tell you why HF isn't shipping anything and i expect a beer tip at the end Smiley

HF isn't shipping anything because after adopting the BFL style of doing business now they adopted Avalon's style of doing business and they are selling customer's chip to third party hardware manufacturers. (example1: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/black-miner-asic-bitcoin-mining-hardware-488646 and example2: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-habanero-650ghs-oos-519943) They get twice the money for the same chips and what's funny is that instead of just delivering stuff to their customers they choose to just screw them more. With the money from the customers they produced chips which they seem to sell first to other vendors and with the money from the vendors they will fund their lawyers to protect them from their customers. So it seems that HF is learning very fast from past bitcoin mining businesses, but only the bad part.

I wonder if after they finish with Avalon and BFL they will go Bitfury and KnC style of making a big ass datacenter only for them.
hero member
Activity: 761
Merit: 500
Mine Silent, Mine Deep
So when are you guys turning your phone back on?

I heard the new phone is already on pre-order so soon(tm).

Also, if they are unable to take your call call they will give you up to 4 calls back. Guaranteed.
hero member
Activity: 991
Merit: 500
So when are you guys turning your phone back on?
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
Now he's just a paid shill.  I wonder how those guys at Crashfast pay him - BTC, chips, or "freebies"?
Most likely with false promises.

The only company in the world selling mining equipment that really hashes at 2TH/s is HashFast (hence our name).
This may be true, selling, but what about delivering? Anything? My Cointerra order, paid in November, arrived last week and hashes away happily since then. I still wait for HashLast products (hence the name).
You sound different since you're back. Are you IceDrill? Did they offer you faster delivery for some propaganda? Don't trust them, they tricked you before.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
Cross posting from the official CrashFast 800G thread to hedge against deletion:

Quote
If I had any BTC, I would bet Hashfast-CL is Icebreaker, but I'd want 2:1 odds.


Good thing I hedged - my original post about Icebreaker was deleted from the "official" Crashfast-800 thread yesterday.

Circumstantial evidence?

It's kind of sad if true.  Icebreaker used to be a Top Ten master-troll before he got strung out on Crashfast - effective and entertaining.  Now he's just a paid shill.  I wonder how those guys at Crashfast pay him - BTC, chips, or "freebies"?   (And I don't mean free mining rigs)
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Screwing them legally is always better than being screwed by their actions.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #eA8fN08Dr07SJnL5
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
The "no matter what you do" part is funny, as you are not doing anything. You are not shipping. You are not delivering. You are not responding to support email requests. You are not responding to support phone calls. You are not responding to refund requests.
Their lawyers are taking time.
This is what they are doing.

It looks like that two weeks to order a list of 6 arbitrators in order of preference is not enough for them. They need more (and something tells me that it's just the beginning).
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #qZutOyofyuwg7d9L

I did not ask for lawyers. I only ask to get my orders delivered

They can't even get this simplest of things done right.

Imagine if you bring in the lawyers... how long is that going to take?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Sure, he is holding several petahashes in his hand.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kSS2HGUEsiKL3eEe
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
Quote
Non-Disparagement. Buyer agrees that Buyer shall disparage, libel, or criticize the Company or publish any statement concerning the other that this is critical.
Does that seriously read "buyer shall" rather than "buyer shall not"?  Sounds like a pretty weird thing to have people agree to; "You will badmouth our company, or else!"
( The entire sentence is a bit Engrish )

They took too much of the dope they got in November 2013 (silver box, damaged).

Since then they are tripping so hard (see deranged grimace), that they are not able to do the simplest things right.



Hence the clusterfuck.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
The "no matter what you do" part is funny, as you are not doing anything. You are not shipping. You are not delivering. You are not responding to support email requests. You are not responding to support phone calls. You are not responding to refund requests.
Their lawyers are taking time.
This is what they are doing.

It looks like that two weeks to order a list of 6 arbitrators in order of preference is not enough for them. They need more (and something tells me that it's just the beginning).
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #qZutOyofyuwg7d9L
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
Quote
Non-Disparagement. Buyer agrees that Buyer shall disparage, libel, or criticize the Company or publish any statement concerning the other that this is critical.
Does that seriously read "buyer shall" rather than "buyer shall not"?  Sounds like a pretty weird thing to have people agree to; "You will badmouth our company, or else!"
( The entire sentence is a bit Engrish )
hero member
Activity: 761
Merit: 500
Mine Silent, Mine Deep
(Reposting here after HF_CL deleted my post ...as usual... on the 800GH/s thread):

what I should be doing is perusing criminal charges. Your theft is not just a civil matter at this point
A 105% refund is not "nothing" no matter how much you prefer a 600% windfall.
No court is going to ignore the fact you refused a refund in legal tender.
You are only attempting to pay 105% because that is still pennies compared to what your customers paid you, and you know it, so you can offer 105, 120, 150%, it doesnt matter, none of it is equal to what they paid you.

As mentioned by others previously, that 'refund' was basically hush money that came with some strings attached:

Quote
Release. Buyer hereby fully, forever, irrevocably and unconditionally releases, remises and discharges HashFast Technologies LLC from any and all actions, claims, charges, complaints, demands, causes of action, suits, rights, debts, sums of money, costs, accounts, reckonings, covenants, contracts, agreements, promises, doings, omissions, damages, executions, obligations, liabilities, damages, injuries, consequences, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and costs), of every kind and nature which Buyer ever had or now has against the Released Parties (the “Claims”).

Non-Disparagement. Buyer agrees that Buyer shall disparage, libel, or criticize the Company or publish any statement concerning the other that this is critical. Buyer likewise shall keep confidential the fact of the settlement, the terms of this Agreement, and the fact and amount of the consideration paid or to be paid hereunder and shall not release or disseminate any information concerning such matters or the terms hereof to any third party without the express written consent of the other parties

http://hashfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Batch-1-Refund-and-Release-Hashfast-Technologies-FINAL.pdf

Accepting this would not only have been a very bad deal, it would have made me complicit as I would be unable to warn new customers walking into this trap.
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
It seems HashFast_CL had to go home early to mom today and decided to lock the thread at

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5741703

Quote from: HashFast_CL
HashFast is working as hard as possible to build and deliver upgrade kits and MPP as fast as possible.

Our engineers and production staff work around the clock.  The idea we're resting on our laurels, or mining with customer equipment, or whatever the latest baseless FUD rumor (tropical island/hammock/mai tai) the forum dreams up, is ridiculous.

I'm sorry but that statement is total bullshit and you know it. What the fuck have you been doing for the last 6 weeks? No equipment has been shipping, no replacement BBJet units for RMA cases. No MPP for the BBJets. No Upgrade kits, except for 1 or 2 units. No Sierra units. No MPP for the Sierra units.

It's not rocket science... the chips are here and they work. The PCB has been finalized and can be produced in a few days time. You have a supplier of power supplies it seems, exclusively. CIARA can slap together over 500 units a day you claim, give or take a few loose screws in their cases.

With these facts, you should be pumping out hundreds of units every day and ship them world wide

How come nobody is getting the equipment they paid for in September 2013? What is holding you back? Seriously? How long do you think you can keep this up?

Who in their right mind will be so stupid to ever order again from HashFast with the above facts? They will be pouring their BTC into a black hole when placing an order.

Quote from: HashFast_CL

The HashFast Derangement Syndrome, where the haters spew endless negativity no matter what we do, is getting old.

If you want to talk about haters, trust me, I'm a big hater. You took my preorder BTC and did a runner with it. You have not delivered anything, except a few hundred BBJet units.

The "no matter what you do" part is funny, as you are not doing anything. You are not shipping. You are not delivering. You are not responding to support email requests. You are not responding to support phone calls. You are not responding to refund requests.

So yes, please enlighten us, other than posting about new vapourware products you are trying to pre-sell, what are you doing?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.
Cross posting from the official CrashFast 800G thread to hedge against deletion:

Quote
If I had any BTC, I would bet Hashfast-CL is Icebreaker, but I'd want 2:1 odds.


You would win that bet. Ralph does love his job it seems.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
Cross posting from the official CrashFast 800G thread to hedge against deletion:

Quote
If I had any BTC, I would bet Hashfast-CL is Icebreaker, but I'd want 2:1 odds.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
Yes, he did incorporate support for the NanoFury for nothing... unless you consider the 2 units that I sent to Luke so that he test and develop with them as a payment - they probably made $50 in their entire life

p.s. a required clarification - it is almost impossible to add support for a given hardware/device/asic/etc without having the actual hardware to test with. So in my opinion those are required development tools.

Thanks for the response, I do appreciate it.  I'm well versed on the limitations of trying to support hardware without access to the iron itself.  My questions were more to the point of whether Luke had actually received free hardware that he considered paid for by his efforts in adding support to BFGMiner.  I then went on to isolate the validity of that concept by asking if he would have supported the device for free.

My comments may have come off as rude or abrupt, however Luke Jr isn't exactly a shining star when it comes to his history in Cryptoland.

legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".

So BFL did not pay for your trip to their facility and later gave you their first ASIC, trying to pass it off as if they "started shipping" (where have we seen that too in December 2013 from another bunch of scammers?). And didn't that shipped machine turn out to be still at the BFL labs while you were hacking on it remotely?

So yes, if you sacrifice your own reputation to get into bed with lowlifes like BFL and Hashfast, the comes at a cost and that is not "free" you are right.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
I don't know you from Adam but your original comment was not only childishly rude, but made no sense. He was suggesting impartial leadership for the group. If you are just looking be an ass find a new thread. You obviously feel threatened by Luke Jr or you are really jealous. Neither of which is taken up in the OP.


Oh you have an opinion do you?  That's great, really.  There's such a lack of people with opinions around here that I've been longing for someone to show up with one.

I would also suggest impartial leadership and Bicknellski isnt impartial. That doesnt change the irony of Luke's statement. If, in your view I "obviously feel threatened by Luke Jr", then in mine you're obviously an idiot.
vs3
hero member
Activity: 622
Merit: 500
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".

Are you saying you wouldn't have incorporated the new ASIC hardware on your own, for nothing?  

Yes, he did incorporate support for the NanoFury for nothing... unless you consider the 2 units that I sent to Luke so that he test and develop with them as a payment - they probably made $50 in their entire life

p.s. a required clarification - it is almost impossible to add support for a given hardware/device/asic/etc without having the actual hardware to test with. So in my opinion those are required development tools.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
Bounty manager (https://t.me/Gudwinn)
Hashfast has a terrible reputation
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
bump for awareness.... no1 should feed these low life scammers.
legendary
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".

Are you saying you wouldn't have incorporated the new ASIC hardware on your own, for nothing?  
That's irrelevant.
You're also assuming I didn't pay for it...

So you haven't received any developer (or otherwise) hardware that you did not specifically pay for in cash dollars or Bitcoin?

I don't know you from Adam but your original comment was not only childishly rude, but made no sense. He was suggesting impartial leadership for the group. If you are just looking be an ass find a new thread. You obviously feel threatened by Luke Jr or you are really jealous. Neither of which is taken up in the OP.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".

Are you saying you wouldn't have incorporated the new ASIC hardware on your own, for nothing?  
That's irrelevant.
You're also assuming I didn't pay for it...

So you haven't received any developer (or otherwise) hardware that you did not specifically pay for in cash dollars or Bitcoin?
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".

Are you saying you wouldn't have incorporated the new ASIC hardware on your own, for nothing?  
That's irrelevant.
You're also assuming I didn't pay for it...
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".

Are you saying you wouldn't have incorporated the new ASIC hardware on your own, for nothing? 
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
You need to check your dictionary for the definition of "free".
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
* TheRealSteve passes the popcorn around
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...

Says the guy who got free hardware from both BFL and Hashfast
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.

Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.

+1 Here here.

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers. Here was my post for a guild.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/diy-custom-open-hardware-software-guild-call-for-ideas-282030
You should find someone to spearhead this who isn't biased against other reputable people...
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin is too valuable to be used as a currency
I heard this and is sad, sorry guys for your losses. Undecided
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
einc.io
Batch One EVOs sold out almost instantly, so exhibiting your grudge in public hasn't had any noticeable effect.  Better get a Batch Two before they're gone!

If Batch One sold out almost instantly, why are you still stuck at Batch Two?
I suspect you skip Batch One to make it look how succesfull you are scamming people.
Once a thief, always a thief !!!

Asshole keep deleting my posts, no worries, I will reposting the truth.

He asshole, when are you sending out the MPP?
And why so many people don't have their BJ yet?

Keep this thread alive, so that people who are not aware that Hashlast are just a bunch of thieves will know about the truth.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
98 BTC here, 120 BTC there, 210 BTC from the other guy.

That's almost $500,000 stolen by Hashfast from just three people!

Let's see LTC and Doge match that!!

legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
Quote
There are many others before HashFast_CL that should be banner, but they won't because thermos is a lazy ass.

Theymos is an ancap.  Ancaps don't condone coercion. Banning is a form of coercion.

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
Also keep in mind that when you post in the HF self-moderated thread it bumps it to the top again at least until they delete your post. Doing that keeps their distorted reality more visible than these other threads that are showing people whats missing.  If you're posting something critical in the HF thread: it _will_ be deleted, you might as well at least post it in parallel in the relevant other threads.

(Because of the high rate of deletions in that thread I recommend you post nothing in there at all— but if you feel you must, I don't see a reason to hold the duplication against you: most posts in that thread are deleted.. so just go ahead and simulpost when you post there.)

Also if you ignore hashfast-cl it will make their posts show up small and greyed out for you on the list, so it'll be less distracting. You can still click show to look at their posts at it if you want though... I recommend it if you find them irritating.

You can freely post in the main HashFail thread. You won't get deleted there so you just need to be inspired!

I'd still like to see user HashFast_CL banned. No usefull contributions, just spamming bs.

There are many others before HashFast_CL that should be banner, but they won't because thermos is a lazy ass.
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
I'd still like to see user HashFast_CL banned. No usefull contributions, just spamming bs.
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
Also keep in mind that when you post in the HF self-moderated thread it bumps it to the top again at least until they delete your post. Doing that keeps their distorted reality more visible than these other threads that are showing people whats missing.  If you're posting something critical in the HF thread: it _will_ be deleted, you might as well at least post it in parallel in the relevant other threads.

(Because of the high rate of deletions in that thread I recommend you post nothing in there at all— but if you feel you must, I don't see a reason to hold the duplication against you: most posts in that thread are deleted.. so just go ahead and simulpost when you post there.)

Also if you ignore hashfast-cl it will make their posts show up small and greyed out for you on the list, so it'll be less distracting. You can still click show to look at their posts at it if you want though... I recommend it if you find them irritating.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
Just an update: HashFast has still not refunded the 97.95849881 they owe me after taking my funds and failing to deliver by the refund or die they which they chose, nor do I believe they've refunded or sent products to many other customers.

They have also still not responded to a single one of my certified letters. They have no confirmed with me if they will or won't make good on their explicit commitment to refund the full amount I paid— even though its now more than three months since they violated their agreement.

They also continue to aggressively delete all critical comments or concerned views from their self-moderated thread promoting their latest pre-order product. These deletions include deleting messages where they claim to have sent me a refund— which they have not— and where I respond pointing out that they have not done so.


Same here.. no communication whatsoever....  arbitration continuing.  210 btc here....
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
Just an update: HashFast has still not refunded the 97.95849881 they owe me after taking my funds and failing to deliver by the refund or die they which they chose, nor do I believe they've refunded or sent products to many other customers.

They have also still not responded to a single one of my certified letters. They have no confirmed with me if they will or won't make good on their explicit commitment to refund the full amount I paid— even though its now more than three months since they violated their agreement.

They also continue to aggressively delete all critical comments or concerned views from their self-moderated thread promoting their latest pre-order product. These deletions include deleting messages where they claim to have sent me a refund— which they have not— and where I respond pointing out that they have not done so.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 37

Hashfast has also ripped me off, to the tune of about 120฿ minus a trivial amount of fiat which is missing a good 20% or so of the total amount I paid even in fiat at the time of my preorder, contrary to their promise to denominate refunds in bitcoins according to the amount paid in bitcoins.

They deleted my question as to whether they were ever going to honour their promise to refund in bitcoins.

I would be interested to know how much longer it will be before they honour their MPP commitments.

I will add to the below, which they deleted from their self-moderated thread, the following: When will you at least complete my fiat-denominated full refund?

Yes, it's both true and awesome!  Proof is at the top of the thread, in the form of cgminer/eligius screenshots and a video of the live output.

We're setting up webcams so everyone can enjoy live streams of a 2TH Sierra EVO, the World's Fastest Bitcoin Miner.

Are you at some point ever going to honour your obligations after promising that returns would be in full and denominated in the same form of payment that they were paid in, as per initial contractual terms, statements and promises here and elsewhere, and original invoice amounts which were also denominated in bitcoins?

staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
FWIW, Hashfast-cl has posted claiming that the only reason people are giving them negative trust is their scammy-looking self moderation.  I responded, pointing out that while their self-moderation is concerning, my negative trust is because they've ripped me off.  Sadly, they decided they didn't want people seeing that post either.

Using negative feedback to express dissatisfaction with a self-moderated thread is silly.  If you don't like self-moderated threads, simply don't read or post in them.
My dissatisfaction is not due to the self-moderation, and I believe I am not alone in that.

However, sometimes certain behavior with self-moderation may be a reason to distrust a party. If self-moderation is used to remove substantiated criticism that may be a severe red-flag.

In my case my negative feed back is that HashFast accepted almost 98 BTC from me for mining hardware to be delivered at the end of October under contractual terms— and assurances in direct communication with staff as well as public comments— guaranteeing a full refund if Hashfast failed to deliver by December 31st, a very generous timeframe considering delays that long would almost certainly guarantee that the equipment would be at a loss at that point.

HashFast, as is well known now, failed their initial delivery targets in October, and later they failed their drop dead date on Dec 31st. As of today, March 5, there are many people still expecting and waiting for hardware with no idea when it will be delivered. HashFast tried unilaterally changing contract terms— demanding customers agree to additional delays and an additional NDA and an agreement to not disparage the company if they wanted to receive any hardware or a refund— even though the customers had an existing established contract in which Hashfast was in default.

I paid HashFast and have received nothing in return. No response to my communications asking them to comply with their agreement or otherwise settle the matter. Beyond a single email that they relieved my first certified letter I have no evidence that they've actually read a single word I've sent them.  Other customers are already in the process of litigating against HashFast...  Personally, I just want them to make good on the agreement as they expressed it and I understood it.  I do not want to enter into an expensive and costly litigation which may ultimately leave hashfast out of business and unable to deliver the products to whatever few people are still purchasing with these substantial red flags at play.

To avoid any further confusion I've requested HashFast refund me in a publicly verifiable way: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5536343  so everyone has an easy check on much progress hashfast has made on making good on their agreements before placing further orders.

Until then, I'd continue to caution anyone against purchasing any products hashfast is offering.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
einc.io
Most of the early miners are intelligent people.
The only mistake they have made is putting trust in the wrong companies.
I don´t think they will burn their hands for a second time.

From all the ASIC companies out there, Hashlast has the less professional customers service.
Lies, lies, lies and nothing but lies is hashlast telling us.

They can´t stand negative criticism and sarcasm.
My messages at their self-moderated has been deleted over and over.
they can´t stand if someone make a bad joke about them.

I totally agree that gmaxwell is not abusing his moderating powers to force hashlast to a solution, despite that hashlast think the opposite.
I totally agree with him that you shouldn´t buy hashlast new "up to 800GH/s" "product".

If you decide to buy despite all the warnings, I can assure you, that you will have a lot of stress and grey hair.
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
An update:  Someone else mentioning this thread seems to have penetrated the reality distortion field which has prevented HF from acknowledging my existence— at least indirectly, and HF_CL commented on it.

I've responded inviting them to make good on their contract and refund me in a publicly verifiable manner:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5536343
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Secret shopper good idea.

Guild / Collective good idea.

Sitting on our collective ass and letting others get screwed bad idea.

There is plenty that can be done.

Ideally it be best to have a positive format / forum where those vendors and customers can come to report legitimate and well respected companies. The idea that consumers and producers can't work together seems pretty silly given the number of people in this community that are both customers and now sellers and who have been scammed in the past and want to change that. Nothing better than having people wronged looking to right the problems.

This community can gain more if they are pushing for self-governance vs. expecting regulations or courts to resolve issues with unethical companies and people who are leeching off us. Most of these problems would go away if there was a concerted effort to promote what most of us want in Minerland. Product that we pay for is shipped quickly, no pre-sales bs and clear ethical guideline for refunds. Those who subscribe to this will win the market and the rest will die off. BFL or HF can't compete with say Antminer at this stage and that is good.
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
this should be set as a sticky..  or a buyers beware thread up top for all the bullshit scam companies
I feel like I can't reasonably do that because I can't vet every complaint with high confidence. And I don't want to just sticky vendors who have screwed _me_, while vendors who have screwed other people don't get the sticky.

And even when a company has screwed up some— been a bit late, a bit underspec, shipped a few bad units, or blown off a reasonable customer complaint— shit happens in business, especially one as time crunched for mining hardware.  Sell enough products and some are sure to break, have enough crazy customers and one is sure to try to operate it under-water and demand a refund. Where exactly should I draw the line?

So I think the simpler thing for me to do is to express my own opinion and experience as clearly and earnestly as possible, without pomp and distractions and encourage other people to do the same.


One idea I had was for the community here to operate a secret-shopper program— like a group buy, but which endeavors to covertly purchase one of every device its contributors thinks is sufficiently non-scammy and then reviews the device and rolls the returns into running the program (or paying back the people who sponsored it, if possible)... but the problem is that the results of such a test would come far too late to actually help people in most cases. Maybe a year from now the market will have settled some and doing some more "consumer reports" work will actually work.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
this should be set as a sticky..  or a buyers beware thread up top for all the bullshit scam companies

I agree,we need to help the newcomers to BTC..........& old farts as well  Grin

Just an honest report of actual dealings from high standing individuals from this forum (or the like) & have it self moderated to quell any trolling.

Keep all updates in the original post (very first one),so folks don't have to read the whole thread to glean pertinent info.

 

hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
this should be set as a sticky..  or a buyers beware thread up top for all the bullshit scam companies
legendary
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.

Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.

+1 Here here.

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers. Here was my post for a guild.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/diy-custom-open-hardware-software-guild-call-for-ideas-282030

But last I heard membership was closed.
hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 661
Do due diligence
First I want to say thank you to the people on this forum. I would still be waiting for a Monarch, staring at a rack with everything but the card, weeping over Mt.Gox and maybe the idea of bitcoin wouldn't seem so appealing to me (a regular consumer).
*No tongue in cheek this is a genuine "thank you".

It has been very interesting to see how companies respond to consumers here. It is very telling of what you can expect from them.

I respect you for taking a high road gmaxwell but I also feel that when a company/entity is here selling something: leaving all civil opposing opinions is a fair thing to do and be expected.
I saw your response and it was less heated than most could muster given the circumstance.

So Hashfast reaps remarks instead of addressing concerns? WTG Hashfast *oops sarcasm slipped back in
 
Thankfully another member directs us to a full unedited version (at least until that's reaped too) and you are here.

Also on another note the Bitmain Antminer has been tempting AND I think it's adorable but I also own a pocket knife with a circuit board for a handle so there's no accounting for my taste  Wink
My BFL single was simple the case: decent and it cut down on "other noises", I didn't buy it from BFL not only because of complaints that I mainly found here
BUT because of the companies direct responses to customers and potential customers.

hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Lessons to learn:

1. Never pre-order ASIC mining hardware.

2. Never store funds on an exchange unless you are converting immediately and withdrawing.

3. Backup your wallet.dat and encrypt that baby.

Pretty simple. I may have missed one or two fundamental lessons. But these 3 should sum it up for every noob and pioneer.

and

4.  never get involved in a land war in Asia?
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
einc.io

Do NOT pre-order asics....

bitmain is shipping in stock asics... they aint sexy, but they perform very well.


They aint sexy, that's true, but they are well engineered.
Fast to build, cheap to build and reliable as advertise.
BITMAIN can still drop the price to stay competive.
They are the only company that is funded by themself and have miners in stock.
No bragging on their website who they are.
Some people accuse them not answering PM's, if I were them, I also not answering people who spam and talk rubbish.
They do answer you if you PM them in a polite way and not spam.
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10

Where are you getting this cult idea from? What do you think the outcome of something like this would be? You don't have to be a part of the group if you don't want to, but I think it would benefit the community at large and am interested in your opposition to such an idea.

it's not for me, is all i'm saying, i don't see why this is a concern for you.
best wishes

I can understand that and I respect that. I only ask because I like to look at all sides of an issue and possible positive/negative audience opinion to better formulate action. It's what I do with most business decision I make, so I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask you as to what your objections were so I could improve/strengthen that part of the argument or realize that it is a lost cause as a whole undertaking. I understand that something like this wouldn't appeal to everyone. Thank you for your input.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Where are you getting this cult idea from? What do you think the outcome of something like this would be? You don't have to be a part of the group if you don't want to, but I think it would benefit the community at large and am interested in your opposition to such an idea.

it's not for me, is all i'm saying, i don't see why this is a concern for you.
best wishes
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10

I don't think you do get the idea


your thought misleads you.


and I don't understand what harm you think could come of this.


I think that no harm will come of it, as it is not something that I will partake in.


It wouldn't be run by those organizations, in my ideal situation anyway, but just be a separate, non-biased, unaffiliated organization that vets the scammers out there and gives people an idea of who is legit and who isn't without digging through loads of Bitcointalk pages and Reddit. It isn't going to be the OPEC of the Bitcoin mining industry.


As I said, if you feel the need to be part of a group, carry on.


But you would rather solo mine with 1 GH? What does that have to do with anything written here? Or are you happy that some people are getting scammed and scammers are upping the ante because that makes your mining more profitable? I'm really struggling to see why something like this isn't necessary and wouldn't be embraced by the community since the days of bASIC, the lost Avalon chips, BFL, BFL, BFL, Cointerra underdelivering, VMC/AMC/SCAM being investigated by the MO Attorney General and going through supposedly 4 chip redesigns while people who invested have NOTHING to show for it. This is an idea that is highly overdue in this marketplace if we are ever to be considered legitimate as we already have enough recent problems with the legal issues of key players in the Bitcoin ecosystem already. Miners have been going with the idea of individual responsibility and buyer beware, etc, which is great and all, but we have seen the fruits of that approach already and they have been bittersweet or downright rottern for the majority of miners.

yes, i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s than be part of any centralised cult. thanks.

Where are you getting this cult idea from? What do you think the outcome of something like this would be? You don't have to be a part of the group if you don't want to, but I think it would benefit the community at large and am interested in your opposition to such an idea.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
I'm currently looking for whomever owns hashfastscam.org (or similar domains) and I'm also interested in getting in contact with other hashfast customers in the SF bay area.

I think user Cedivad is running http://hashfast.org/List_of_Lies, PM him to see if he is behind that one too:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cedivad-63794

That's me, yes (public whois), but no, i'm not behind any other domains. I don't really like the idea of being sued for damages.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

I don't think you do get the idea


your thought misleads you.


and I don't understand what harm you think could come of this.


I think that no harm will come of it, as it is not something that I will partake in.


It wouldn't be run by those organizations, in my ideal situation anyway, but just be a separate, non-biased, unaffiliated organization that vets the scammers out there and gives people an idea of who is legit and who isn't without digging through loads of Bitcointalk pages and Reddit. It isn't going to be the OPEC of the Bitcoin mining industry.


As I said, if you feel the need to be part of a group, carry on.


But you would rather solo mine with 1 GH? What does that have to do with anything written here? Or are you happy that some people are getting scammed and scammers are upping the ante because that makes your mining more profitable? I'm really struggling to see why something like this isn't necessary and wouldn't be embraced by the community since the days of bASIC, the lost Avalon chips, BFL, BFL, BFL, Cointerra underdelivering, VMC/AMC/SCAM being investigated by the MO Attorney General and going through supposedly 4 chip redesigns while people who invested have NOTHING to show for it. This is an idea that is highly overdue in this marketplace if we are ever to be considered legitimate as we already have enough recent problems with the legal issues of key players in the Bitcoin ecosystem already. Miners have been going with the idea of individual responsibility and buyer beware, etc, which is great and all, but we have seen the fruits of that approach already and they have been bittersweet or downright rottern for the majority of miners.

yes, i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s than be part of any centralised cult. thanks.
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy

I don't think you get the idea of the guild / association. It is a BBB for Miners. Not a mining pool or a place to sell products. Open to all who would rather deal with reputable and honest brokers in the Miner field as opposed to the HF / BFL / Avalon types.

no, i get the idea of a cult/sect/group orgy/foundation/union/guild perfectly well thank you.
if you feel the need to be part of a club, carry on. it's not for me, thanks.



I don't think you do get the idea and I don't understand what harm you think could come of this. It wouldn't be run by those organizations, in my ideal situation anyway, but just be a separate, non-biased, unaffiliated organization that vets the scammers out there and gives people an idea of who is legit and who isn't without digging through loads of Bitcointalk pages and Reddit. It isn't going to be the OPEC of the Bitcoin mining industry.

But you would rather solo mine with 1 GH? What does that have to do with anything written here? Or are you happy that some people are getting scammed and scammers are upping the ante because that makes your mining more profitable? I'm really struggling to see why something like this isn't necessary and wouldn't be embraced by the community since the days of bASIC, the lost Avalon chips, BFL, BFL, BFL, Cointerra underdelivering, VMC/AMC/SCAM being investigated by the MO Attorney General and going through supposedly 4 chip redesigns while people who invested have NOTHING to show for it. This is an idea that is highly overdue in this marketplace if we are ever to be considered legitimate as we already have enough recent problems with the legal issues of key players in the Bitcoin ecosystem already. Miners have been going with the idea of individual responsibility and buyer beware, etc, which is great and all, but we have seen the fruits of that approach already and they have been bittersweet or downright rottern for the majority of miners.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Lmao why don't you just ban them
They deleted you from your own forum

Gmaxwell has a quaint idea of fair play. 

Although, as he says, he has not threatened to use his moderator powers against Hashfast_CL, he did threaten to ban ME. 

This was because I mentioned Hashfast's unsavory employees in the other thread and then reposted it when Hashfast_CL deleted.

Polite opposition might seem chivalrous to gmaxwell, but I've learned not to extend such courtesies to entities with cesspool ethics like Hashfast's.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Lmao why don't you just ban them
They deleted you from your own forum
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy

I don't think you get the idea of the guild / association. It is a BBB for Miners. Not a mining pool or a place to sell products. Open to all who would rather deal with reputable and honest brokers in the Miner field as opposed to the HF / BFL / Avalon types.

no, i get the idea of a cult/sect/group orgy/foundation/union/guild perfectly well thank you.
if you feel the need to be part of a club, carry on. it's not for me, thanks.



If you want people to keep getting suckered... then I guess no sense protecting one another. Finger pointing in the wrong direction buddy.



I don't understand your comment, please elaborate where I have been pointing fingers in this case?
suckers will always exist, even when they are given a club to play in.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy

I don't think you get the idea of the guild / association. It is a BBB for Miners. Not a mining pool or a place to sell products. Open to all who would rather deal with reputable and honest brokers in the Miner field as opposed to the HF / BFL / Avalon types.

no, i get the idea of a cult/sect/group orgy/foundation/union/guild perfectly well thank you.
if you feel the need to be part of a club, carry on. it's not for me, thanks.



If you want people to keep getting suckered... then I guess no sense protecting one another. Finger pointing in the wrong direction buddy.

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy

I don't think you get the idea of the guild / association. It is a BBB for Miners. Not a mining pool or a place to sell products. Open to all who would rather deal with reputable and honest brokers in the Miner field as opposed to the HF / BFL / Avalon types.

no, i get the idea of a cult/sect/group orgy/foundation/union/guild perfectly well thank you.
if you feel the need to be part of a club, carry on. it's not for me, thanks.

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000

I would like to add that I have had 210 btc taken from me by HashFast.....  They promised me specifically of a return of btc if not delivered by Jan 1, 2014.  

I have not received anything from hashfast except silence...  

Do NOT pre-order asics....

bitmain is shipping in stock asics... they aint sexxy, but they perform very well.

hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy

I don't think you get the idea of the guild / association. It is a BBB for Miners. Not a mining pool or a place to sell products. Open to all who would rather deal with reputable and honest brokers in the Miner field as opposed to the HF / BFL / Avalon types.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers.

i'd rather solo mine with 1gh/s.
JUST NO.
 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
I'm currently looking for whomever owns hashfastscam.org (or similar domains) and I'm also interested in getting in contact with other hashfast customers in the SF bay area.

I think user Cedivad is running http://hashfast.org/List_of_Lies, PM him to see if he is behind that one too:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cedivad-63794
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.

Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.

+1 Here here.

We need association or guild of reputable miner fabricators and developers. Here was my post for a guild.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/diy-custom-open-hardware-software-guild-call-for-ideas-282030
sr. member
Activity: 256
Merit: 250
Because it's sterile...
That is what I have learned from my very short time around these forums.

Lessons to learn:

1. Never pre-order ASIC mining hardware.

2. Never store funds on an exchange unless you are converting immediately and withdrawing.

3. Backup your wallet.dat and encrypt that baby.

Pretty simple. I may have missed one or two fundamental lessons. But these 3 should sum it up for every noob and pioneer.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Lessons to learn:

1. Never pre-order ASIC mining hardware.

2. Never store funds on an exchange unless you are converting immediately and withdrawing.

3. Backup your wallet.dat and encrypt that baby.

Pretty simple. I may have missed one or two fundamental lessons. But these 3 should sum it up for every noob and pioneer.
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
Unfortunately, for some reason Hashfast does not want you to see this vital information about the integrity of their operations and the realities of their product non-delivery— so they deleted my post.  

They also deleted some of my posts in the past so I'll just repost them here if you don't mind:

The chip is running at 750GH/s.  That's a world record!  Having a chip that runs 50% faster than the nearest competitor is a big deal, especially given the rapidly rising rate of mining difficulty.

Who cares about your stupid world record. Are you 7 years old or what?

The only important thing for a customer who wants to buy mining equipment is by what date you can deliver the equipment, at what cost and at what power consumption

For example the HashFast BabyJet was very competitive IF it would have been delivered on time early November 2013. But by shipping your  flagship Golden Nonce 3 months late,

http://visionman-btc.com/blogs/news/11274809-hashfast-now-offering-the-long-pole-and-the-short-end-of-the-stick

it means it's completely obsolete, even compared to near competitors who did ship inferior equipment, slower, higher power consumption but ON TIME.

If you don't understand any of these facts, why are you trolling for HashFast because even you make them look worse than they are.

Shouldn't you be in the back office trying to fix or printer or so?

As a Batch #1 HashFast customer (product delivered 3 months late, 1/4 defective), an Upgrade customer (not delivered at all, now 4 months late), a Batch #2 Sierra customer (not delivered at all, now 4 months late), a Batch #1 MPP customer (not delivered at all, now useless), I can only point out to anybody considering to even order future equipment from HashFast: Don't. Past performance has proven HashFast sells overpriced products that don't reach their promised performance and in general, the equipment is delivered so late (or not at all) that it's impossible to make any money of your initial investment back.

Please don't order from HashFast, you'll regret them

Just read the stupid drivel of their Community Liaison...

Spend your money on a company that has an actual working product, where customers don't need to prefund its development and debug/co-develop  broken firmware. And that has product on stock, not a 3 months lead time which will go over deadline, rendering the product useless.

legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Are you saying you want to create a miners union? 

Why would you create a new account just to ask this?
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
Sorry about your loss dude. I lost around 30K on BFL so I feel your pain.
jr. member
Activity: 39
Merit: 4
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.
I'm speaking from my own experience. Sadly, I can't really afford to buy a couple units from every vendor that comes along.  You'll note that I'm not using any special moderator powers here, e.g. kicking Hashfast's ass for deleting my post in their self moderated thread. I'm here as a (well known) community member.

(Y'all wanna fund me to buy one of every other piece of hardware, I will— and then I'll be glad to blast the everlasting crap out of them when they don't deliver... kinda costly though)

Quote
Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.
I was in Germany at the time of their announcement and couldn't do my normal due diligence which probably would have saved me— and did from several other vendors before. Sad

From now on I wouldn't agree to a preorder without using a multisig escrow or alike just to prevent the current situation.

Thank you for the response. That might have came off a little harsher than I intended it to, but as a Bitcoin consultant I have lost my patience for these snake-oil salesman coming through town. I understand that you can only speak from your own experience and can't buy everything out there, but as you are well-known in the community your voice carries more weight than say, cedividad, (no offense intended cedividad). I respect that you didn't use your moderator powers as you could have and instead started a separate thread, which I think is commendable, but as I said your voice carries weight and it made the rounds of the internet I frequent VERY quickly.

As an aside, maybe we should have a sort of Bitcoin Miner Foundation, or something of the sort in order to give more of a voice and power to miners in some way. They can be funded by miners to buy miners and then do a whole consumer report of the whole situation. This would at least provide more transparency and accountability for our side of things. It might be a dumb idea or brought up before, but it's one I've kicked around for a bit.

Thank you for calling out Hashfast and relaying your personal experience.

Are you saying you want to create a miners union? 
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.
I'm speaking from my own experience. Sadly, I can't really afford to buy a couple units from every vendor that comes along.  You'll note that I'm not using any special moderator powers here, e.g. kicking Hashfast's ass for deleting my post in their self moderated thread. I'm here as a (well known) community member.

(Y'all wanna fund me to buy one of every other piece of hardware, I will— and then I'll be glad to blast the everlasting crap out of them when they don't deliver... kinda costly though)

Quote
Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.
I was in Germany at the time of their announcement and couldn't do my normal due diligence which probably would have saved me— and did from several other vendors before. Sad

From now on I wouldn't agree to a preorder without using a multisig escrow or alike just to prevent the current situation.

Thank you for the response. That might have came off a little harsher than I intended it to, but as a Bitcoin consultant I have lost my patience for these snake-oil salesman coming through town. I understand that you can only speak from your own experience and can't buy everything out there, but as you are well-known in the community your voice carries more weight than say, cedividad, (no offense intended cedividad). I respect that you didn't use your moderator powers as you could have and instead started a separate thread, which I think is commendable, but as I said your voice carries weight and it made the rounds of the internet I frequent VERY quickly.

As an aside, maybe we should have a sort of Bitcoin Miner Foundation, or something of the sort in order to give more of a voice and power to miners in some way. They can be funded by miners to buy miners and then do a whole consumer report of the whole situation. This would at least provide more transparency and accountability for our side of things. It might be a dumb idea or brought up before, but it's one I've kicked around for a bit.

Thank you for calling out Hashfast and relaying your personal experience.
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.
I'm speaking from my own experience. Sadly, I can't really afford to buy a couple units from every vendor that comes along.  You'll note that I'm not using any special moderator powers here, e.g. kicking Hashfast's ass for deleting my post in their self moderated thread. I'm here as a (well known) community member.

(Y'all wanna fund me to buy one of every other piece of hardware, I will— and then I'll be glad to blast the everlasting crap out of them when they don't deliver... kinda costly though)

Quote
Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.
I was in Germany at the time of their announcement and couldn't do my normal due diligence which probably would have saved me— and did from several other vendors before. Sad

From now on I wouldn't agree to a preorder without using a multisig escrow or alike just to prevent the current situation.
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
So I'm just wondering, is gmaxwell going to start calling out all of the overpromising/underdelivering, cough BFL cough, hardware companies or just the one's he has money invested in and ignore the one's who have invested money in advertising here. Because there are/have been a lot of them out there and I haven't seen this kind of response until now.

Regardless, this isn't all that surprising after my initial meetings with their team before they went public. Something was just off and then I found out they claimed that someone who is actually financially backing another company financed their operations. The dog and pony show was awesome, but when it came down to it, Lil Sebastian was/is late to the party still.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
I'm also interested in getting in contact with other hashfast customers in the SF bay area.

I'm in the SF Bay Area, feel free to send me a PM. I visited their office in the past (and got lied to in my face as it turned out). I did receive my hardware in late January. It was not very stable but I've been able to iron out the kinks. No MPP of course, and looking at ~90% loss in BTC overall on this investment.

To be honest, I was just hoping HF would ship the damn MPP so I can leave all this drama behind me. I got caught up in too many scammy operations (Bitcoinica, MtGox, BFL, HF) and it is starting to leave a really sour taste in my mouth.

Bitcoin allow you to eliminate trust when it comes to the actual transaction but in the end you still have to trust individuals and companies so the sword cuts both ways. Arguably when it comes to pre-orders it just cuts your way.

Pre-orders and bitcoin don't mix. Off-chain custodial services (wallets, exchanges, ETFs etc) and bitcoin don't mix either. Looks like this is a lesson we all have to learn the hard way.

^This.

The time for pre-orders has ended.  If they can't ship it to you within a week, don't buy it.
hero member
Activity: 761
Merit: 500
Mine Silent, Mine Deep
I'm also interested in getting in contact with other hashfast customers in the SF bay area.

I'm in the SF Bay Area, feel free to send me a PM. I visited their office in the past (and got lied to in my face as it turned out). I did receive my hardware in late January. It was not very stable but I've been able to iron out the kinks. No MPP of course, and looking at ~90% loss in BTC overall on this investment.

To be honest, I was just hoping HF would ship the damn MPP so I can leave all this drama behind me. I got caught up in too many scammy operations (Bitcoinica, MtGox, BFL, HF) and it is starting to leave a really sour taste in my mouth.

Bitcoin allow you to eliminate trust when it comes to the actual transaction but in the end you still have to trust individuals and companies so the sword cuts both ways. Arguably when it comes to pre-orders it just cuts your way.

So pre-orders and bitcoin don't mix. Off-chain custodial services (wallets, exchanges, ETFs etc) and bitcoin don't mix either. Looks like this is a lesson we all have to learn the hard way.
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
I've heard from other people that they haven't spoken up on this because of HashFast's obscene NDA they added after Jan 1st for (some) customers to actually receive anything.  If you'd like to speak up and feel constrained by your agreement, please contact me. I may be able to help.

I'm currently looking for whomever owns hashfastscam.org (or similar domains) and I'm also interested in getting in contact with other hashfast customers in the SF bay area.

And if you are thinking of buying their new product after seeing the above, I think a lot of people here would be very interested in hearing why.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
Sorry to hear more problems and thank you for sharing. I was actually about to order from Hashfast but ordered instead from another company last October, not sure yet if it was any better...

My experiences so far...  Avalon Batch #3...  they delivered finally (only) three months late.
Now waiting for Bitmine delivery which was promised last week of Dec, but nothing yet. Anyway already two months late.
LA3M unit from asiabtc / lightingasic came actually fast a bit over week after payment!

Generally buyingpreordering ASICs seems to be really risky.

FTFY
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
Sorry to hear more problems and thank you for sharing. I was actually about to order from Hashfast but ordered instead from another company last October, not sure yet if it was any better...

My experiences so far...  Avalon Batch #3...  they delivered finally (only) three months late.
Now waiting for Bitmine delivery which was promised last week of Dec, but nothing yet. Anyway already two months late.
LA3M unit from asiabtc / lightingasic came actually fast a bit over week after payment!

Generally buying ASICs seems to be really risky.
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Just to back up the OP claim.  I have also been swindled out of 89 bitcoins by Hashfast and am currently pursuing arbitration (along with many other customers) to attempt to get them returned.

Buyer beware.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
Amen & good luck bud!!!!!!!!!!!!  Cool
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
I posted this in the thread Hashfast has created promoting their "Yoli Evo Mining Board up to 800GH/s", advising you that in my expirence if you pay hashfast your funds will just vanish into a black hole of non-delivery and no communication.

Unfortunately, for some reason Hashfast does not want you to see this vital information about the integrity of their operations and the realities of their product non-delivery— so they deleted my post.  I think this is critical information for anyone considering doing business with Hashfast— and especially anyone considering buying in to another pre-order of theirs, so I've created a new thread for it. I can see no reason why these concerns wouldn't be equally applicable to their latest vaporware.

Quote
Just in case people are forgetting.

Hashfast is a bunch of thieves. I do not say this lightly: They have literally taken my coin, violated their contract, and provided me with nothing in return. I paid them 98 BTC for hardware "scheduled" to be delivered in October. It's March 2nd now have received _nothing_ and they have not responded to any of my past private efforts to resolve the matter— now spanning months.  (Copies of communications and certified letter tracking numbers available on request).

I am not some competitor or troll: I'm a moderator of this sub-forum and a developer of the Bitcoin reference software.  I have no financial interest or otherwise in any other mining hardware company. I mine personally to support the Bitcoin network.  I've made a genuine effort to resolve this matter from hashfast, but it seems instead that they plan on taking my funds and running.  I sometimes feel bad that I probably do get "more fair" treatment than others with a lower profile in the community, but if they're willing to do this to me then what are they willing to do to you?

Business screwups and delays happen, but in my opinion Hashfast has gone far beyond those boundaries and into the space of outright theft.  Every additional sale hashfast makes while screwing over me and other miners in this manner damages the Bitcoin ecosystem and discourages me— and presumably other small miners— from participating. I've taken what I feel to be a fairly soft hand in this so far, in the hopes that they'd make things right after they cleared up some of their startup hurdles— but with new products being promoted, it seems that isn't their plan.

I urge everyone to provide HashFast with no further business until they make right by their past customers.

If you're looking for hardware and haven't been (rightfully) scared off by the astronomic prices being charged by current hardware vendors— I can personally vouch for Bitmain's Antminer S1s (*), which are delivered promptly, with absolutely no pre-order nonsense, and perform precisely as specified. Cointerra products also appear to be competently handled (though current units only deliver ~1.6TH/s against their original 2TH/s spec, and at least my unit has some hashrate stability problems when run at full speed), and they've treated their customers with reasonable respect (e.g. compensating customers for delays above and beyond the contract).


(*) Disclosure, fwiw: Last year Bitmain sent me a prototype 90GH/s antminer for testing/development prior to their public shipping. I subsequently bought a couple others as a normal customer and have been pretty happy with them as have virtually all of their other customers. Rather than seeing this as a source of potential bias here I'd point out that any well run mining hardware company would get pre-production units out to developers in order to avoid the early product missteps that other companies like HashFast have had.
Jump to: