Pages:
Author

Topic: Wikipedia may accept Bitcoin - page 3. (Read 4064 times)

legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
March 10, 2014, 06:02:42 AM
#22
wow, so fast. they are real techies  Roll Eyes ...

so start it finally - its a no-brainer!

I wish they dont start accepting Litecoin and Dogecoin at the same time.

Such Bad. Much WoW.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
March 09, 2014, 05:59:40 PM
#21
wow, so fast. they are real techies  Roll Eyes ...

so start it finally - its a no-brainer!
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
March 09, 2014, 05:17:49 PM
#20
As most of you probably know Wikipedia runs on donation. I just found Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has bought 0.1 BTC at Coinbase. Hopefully Wikipedia may accept Bitcoin as medium of donation soon...

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/441632741352681472

https://twitter.com/Bitcoin100/status/442762627190489089

Quote
@jimmy_wales When Wikipedia starts accepting #Bitcoin donations, Bitcoin 100 will donate $1,000 via BTC to any wallet address on #Wikipedia.

~Bruno Kucinskas

+1

ReTweeted your post through my little twitter handle @CoinEarn

Thanks, bud.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 251
March 09, 2014, 04:56:27 PM
#19
As most of you probably know Wikipedia runs on donation. I just found Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has bought 0.1 BTC at Coinbase. Hopefully Wikipedia may accept Bitcoin as medium of donation soon...

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/441632741352681472

https://twitter.com/Bitcoin100/status/442762627190489089

Quote
@jimmy_wales When Wikipedia starts accepting #Bitcoin donations, Bitcoin 100 will donate $1,000 via BTC to any wallet address on #Wikipedia.

~Bruno Kucinskas

+1

ReTweeted your post through my little twitter handle @CoinEarn
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
March 09, 2014, 04:52:49 PM
#18
Wikipedia is centralization of information. Information should be decentralized too.

You're right of course but if you don't present a case or any arguments it just sounds like a case of "not invented here syndrome", hence the troll calls.

Back to the OP, Wikipedia accepting BTC would certainly raise the profile of crypto, we're talking about the 5th most popular site on the web, and certainly many non-tech types value it and donate IME.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
March 09, 2014, 04:18:34 PM
#17
Wikipedia is centralization of information. Information should be decentralized too.

Trollololo

dumbololol you can't even explain how wikipedia is not centralized...
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
March 09, 2014, 04:16:47 PM
#16
Wikipedia is centralization of information. Information should be decentralized too.

The amount of idiots on this sub-forum is staggering.

i think you are one of those who take wikipedia information for granted or believe the myth that anyone can edit a page without problems. Try checking the history of controversial subjects pages, the version that gets published is the version that some mods think are best, that's all.

But even then I think you are too idiot to explain how wikipedia is not centralized information.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
March 09, 2014, 04:07:58 PM
#15
Once they do I will resume donating to them.  At this point there are enough worthwhile charitable organizations which DO accept Bitcoins and I have a finite amount of resources I can give away that there is no reason to not direct it towards those organizations which intelligently cut credit cards out of the process and improve the efficiency of their process by 2% or so.
That 2% is a lot. 2% of 100M is a lot.

It is a significant cost overhead they don't need
As long as they convert it at fairly robust rate the donation more or less is the same
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
March 09, 2014, 04:06:17 PM
#14
Once they do I will resume donating to them.  At this point there are enough worthwhile charitable organizations which DO accept Bitcoins and I have a finite amount of resources I can give away that there is no reason to not direct it towards those organizations which intelligently cut credit cards out of the process and improve the efficiency of their process by 2% or so.
That 2% is a lot. 2% of 100M is a lot.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
March 09, 2014, 03:55:52 PM
#13
Once they do I will resume donating to them.  At this point there are enough worthwhile charitable organizations which DO accept Bitcoins and I have a finite amount of resources I can give away that there is no reason to not direct it towards those organizations which intelligently cut credit cards out of the process and improve the efficiency of their process by 2% or so.

I even sent a BCgram (I just coined that term, of which should be self-explanatory): https://blockchain.info/tx/db6e18713dd1d0dead70fba1957577bc48c211d106a1c2bdcd15a9a2d43cab60
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
March 09, 2014, 03:45:02 PM
#12
As most of you probably know Wikipedia runs on donation. I just found Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has bought 0.1 BTC at Coinbase. Hopefully Wikipedia may accept Bitcoin as medium of donation soon...

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/441632741352681472

https://twitter.com/Bitcoin100/status/442762627190489089

Quote
@jimmy_wales When Wikipedia starts accepting #Bitcoin donations, Bitcoin 100 will donate $1,000 via BTC to any wallet address on #Wikipedia.

~Bruno Kucinskas
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
March 09, 2014, 03:26:01 PM
#11
Wikipedia is centralization of information. Information should be decentralized too.

Lol
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 252
REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||
March 09, 2014, 03:10:43 PM
#10
I don't see any reason for them to not to accept BTCBTC as they are non-profitable organization, and totally supported by donations..! and if they start accepting bitcoins i'm sure they will get a good amount of $BTC$ from this community
May be he's just testing the waters for now..! lets see what happens in next few months..

That's a little good for them but a huge benefit for us. Wikipedia accepting Bitcoin means it will generate huge international acceptance.
So I'll call it win-win situation for both the communities..! they getting huge amounts in donations and bitcoins getting huge exposure..!
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
March 09, 2014, 01:54:07 PM
#9
I don't see any reason for them to not to accept BTCBTC as they are non-profitable organization, and totally supported by donations..! and if they start accepting bitcoins i'm sure they will get a good amount of $BTC$ from this community
May be he's just testing the waters for now..! lets see what happens in next few months..

That's a little good for them but a huge benefit for us. Wikipedia accepting Bitcoin means it will generate huge international acceptance.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 252
REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||
March 09, 2014, 01:48:25 PM
#8
I don't see any reason for them to not to accept BTCBTC as they are non-profitable organization, and totally supported by donations..! and if they start accepting bitcoins i'm sure they will get a good amount of $BTC$ from this community
May be he's just testing the waters for now..! lets see what happens in next few months..
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
March 09, 2014, 01:45:45 PM
#6
Wikipedia is centralization of information. Information should be decentralized too.

The amount of idiots on this sub-forum is staggering.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
March 09, 2014, 12:35:23 PM
#5
Bitcoin is becoming really successful Smiley
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
March 09, 2014, 12:34:40 PM
#4
Wikipedia is centralization of information. Information should be decentralized too.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Bitcoin will survive
March 09, 2014, 12:06:43 PM
#3
Few months ago they start this process but strangly are too much late in this they must do this now quickly
Pages:
Jump to: