Topic: WILL Bounty campaigns Ever Keep to their Rules and Regulations - page 11. (Read 1285 times)

Forget about the old days. Those days are gone forever. The problem is that now there are too few ICOs to begin with (the number of ICOs listing every month have declined from hundreds to a few dozens). Therefore we have a lower number of bounty campaigns to participate. On top of that, the number of bounty hunters have increased, as a lot of third world users have flooded this forum. Many of these guys are ready to work under any condition. They have lots and lots of free time, and they don't care the bounty campaign paying them $5 for six months of effort (and they are OK with the campaign not paying as well). The bounty campaign managers also know this, and therefore they are sticking to their terms.

Those bounties who run through bitcoin payment and pays every week is the best because the bounty hunters already have the assurance to get paid while those who promise to pay you at the end of the ICO consist of big risk. There are so many failed project, it can’t be controlled by any platform because the investors will decide if the project is good or not, if you are afraid to waste your time in bounties, look for those who are willing to pay weekly.

Almost all projects are now very disappointing for bounty hunters. Yes there are some good ones, but the price does not match what we have done. Therefore we need a platform that can provide bounty hunters with good and not disappointing project information. At least we can pay properly. Yes, of course, the platform must be very selective in entering the project. And of course also tighten bounty hunters, so there are no cheaters. I strongly believe that the world of crypto is the future, therefore this platform is needed so that the crypto world's self-esteem does not fall.

One of the reasons why a lot of investors hate coins that are launching ICOs is that they do not actually invest money to make their product see the market. One way to gauge whether a project is serious enough to enter the market is for them to release their own money for their product's development. If they are only relying on other people's money, they do not really care whether they will gain success or not. It is not their money that is at stake in the first place after all.

More precisely the projects that are just emerging now want to make something big but they don't want to spend a lot of money to make it, they rely on investors and the task of the bounty hunter is to help them get lots of investors to fund their projects, I think if this strategy that they use, then they will most likely fail through the funding phase. Supposedly, if they intend to build a big project then they must also know that the funds needed are not small. I think at least they can do funding in the beginning to promote it and pay a definite value to bounty hunters and other media.

It seems that it will not be possible, if you look at the tread bounty there will be a writing from the team that the team has the right to change the existing rules.
apart from the rules there is the most basic problem for ICO namely the lack of investors who invest because of the rise of ICO scams in circulation which makes it difficult for ICOs to succeed in reaching their hardcups and even their softcups.

You know it, then stay away from it.
But not all are the same thing as you think. Don't want to name them since there are a lot of bashers here.

Just make your own research then maybe you could find the right ICO to support with.
Most of them may be just copies of what project had been done before but if they have new features it would be better right?
I guess it just depends if they will keep on doing it even with just a soft cap to reach.

This what has become on bounty campaign, there are so many complaints among participants and there's a lot of scam issue also, some of these bounty campaign are scam project, they don't care about anything but only money, the worst I've had with these bounty campaigns, are when they locked participant's token when this is not even in their rules, and when they unlocked it, they are gone or there's no way to sell it anymore, they are just using bounty hunters.

There are still projects out there who stick to their initial promises and timeline but unfortunately, they are few and far between, the sad fact about it is that there is no way for you to product the evil projects until it's too late to do anything about it, you could do your research and discover that a project is possibly the best you could hope for (good and active team, solid usecase, working product) and when it comes time for the campaign to end, they extend it and at that point, there is nothing that can be done about it, I recently saw a campaign that increased duration from 4 weeks to 5 months and that was after the campaign ended, so now participants has to choose either to waste the 4 weeks of work and remove the signature for 4 extra months or if they want to retain the signature and keep promoting the project for 4 more months. There are still good ones out there, but they are few

Not many campaigns want to pay bounty participants with BTC because it might feel too expensive. The team developer certainly chooses to pay using their tokens, because they are cheaper and also to socialize the tokens they make.

I think by now, you should have known what people do with creating Bounty Campaigns for people and creating a new coin out of the blue. It's continuously being done, and nothing has been done to eradicate the scam ones. I know that people who get to invest in different types of currencies should be the sole responsible because you need to see if it's worth it or not.

They want to control everything that comes with their regulations, and you couldn't control that. It's still up to them. I suggest that you need to control what you can and make sure you spend your time wisely.

You are right, most of bounties are a waste of time. Also, good projects are selfconfident, and they do not think bounty at BTT is appropriate, which cause shitcoins to increase. Looks bounties do not have old power left, and it is not useful for any project anymore. In these days BTC paid campaigns are more profitable and keep their promise. Maybe you should try them.

Of course the condition of the bounty campaign now is different as well as the market conditions. Beginning in 2017, not so many ICOs were launched in the market while currently many ICOs were launched and not many were successful in achieving sales targets. Bounty rules always depend on the bounty manager and in my opinion every change must have been through consideration with the developer team

Not all new projects are fake mister, i see you are wearing ez365 signature, the ceo is a well known guy russell has a better plan for the project with good team too, i guess that is why you decide to promote ez365? there are few new projects that have good reputation already, i can start with gowithmi and go down all the way to eterbase or bcnex

The truth is that this project owners now realize that hunters are vulnerable and that they turn to always abuse hunters by making them look like they never and should ever exist. The bigger question is are there really investors in these days?

It depends on the rules and regulation they may add, if it will affect the project or the bounty itself, there will be problems coming from bounty hunters and the project. They can easily change or add anything to the rules as long as it is for the good of the project.

I have joined some bounties this very year that stick to their rules and regulations, no addition weeks or postponement of payments, but the truth is even if there is any postponement its already available of bounty rules that they can adjust any rules and regulations, this is not a problem

will not be the same as 2017 because the more ICO fraud the more ICO will be abandoned. I think ICO should be abolished because it is no longer profitable like 2017 and bounties must also be patient with the current reality.

That's right. Most of project or bounty campaign change their rules any time that they want. And that is the biggest problem that every bounty hunters that hoping for the right and good bounty income but most of the time the salary and the number of post are usually change when the campaign is going on. So before joining in every campaign make sure that you make some research.

Unfortunately, there is no chance that bounty campaigns can be back to those days when we can rely on the credibility of the people behind the project and running the campaign. These days people are more on what they can get and do not care if they bulldozed people to the side of the road, so to speak. I remember the days of 2017 where big projects really happen and many of them paid their bounty hunters well...but even then at that time scams were already rampant. These days, scams are still everywhere sadly we can't find good projects anymore even if we search the needle in the haystack.



Scammers do not care. To them bounty hunters are just another tools they can use to spread the buzz for the project. Sadly, even those that got the money, many of them are prone to be a scam as they now have the money under their own control they can run to nowhere and enjoy a life of abundance using the stash they got from the people. When we are dealing with scammers, we always lose at the end, wasting our time and effort for nothing. This is now the reality we have to face. And that is why I already stopped bounty hunting.



There is nothing wrong with changing anything as long as everything is communicated to all stakeholders and that eventually the project will be paying the people who are toiling to make it more popular. We can understand that not all projects can be able to achieve according to plans so that changes can be necessary. What is worse is if the project is totally abandoned because the minimal cap is not reached and the team is not exerting the required effort to make the whole project a success.