i think they will know what they do , not just "burn" it instanly , so i think its fine , but sad thing when that happens while some country really need it
Topic: Will the Oil be burned and how it will affect the climate - page 3. (Read 302 times)
Hello friends!
Recently I heard some news that countries consider burning oil because there's no more place to store it.
As you know the oil production volumes are huge, and this means that a lot of oil will be burn.
So the question is, how will it affect the earth's climate? Is this a significant concern for the environmentalists?
many countries are affected by falling oil prices, and individual countries will likely need to take swift action and implement reforms, if this prolonged decline will force countries to carry out economic reforms - in some cases, which change their economies by strengthening the private sector. to prevent a big bankruptcy Recently I heard some news that countries consider burning oil because there's no more place to store it.
As you know the oil production volumes are huge, and this means that a lot of oil will be burn.
So the question is, how will it affect the earth's climate? Is this a significant concern for the environmentalists?
Recently I heard some news that countries consider burning oil because there's no more place to store it.
I don't buy that reasoning for one second. If countries are contemplating the burning of oil, it's not because they don't have anywhere to store it (unless someone can convince me otherwise).Oil has been nothing but headache after headache ever since it started being used for oil lamps, heating, and in the production of gasoline and other petroleum products. It's caused political, environmental, economic, and all sorts of other problems and I'll be happy when the world is finally powering itself with cleaner forms of energy.
As far as whatever burning takes place because of the "storage problem," my guess is that it won't be done under ideal conditions and there will probably be some consequences to the environment. The whole idea just rings silly in my ears.
If only humanity is using free energy that was built by a brilliant scientist Nikola tesla then they wouldn't have to dig mineral sources till its last drop and now they're wasting tons of it but in the near future im sure it will all be dried up with nothing and that leaves our vehicles and electronics and power plants nothing to use.
If they're using controlled facilities then it'll do nothing...
As long as they have things like catalytic converters then it'll just be like normal oil that would've been used anyway...
As long as they don't have an open fire and it doesn't cast too many shadows, it might be a shock these days though given the recent lack of pollution.
As long as they have things like catalytic converters then it'll just be like normal oil that would've been used anyway...
As long as they don't have an open fire and it doesn't cast too many shadows, it might be a shock these days though given the recent lack of pollution.
Sounds reassuring!
But what about the tankers full of oil that are drifting in the Pacific? The worst scenario I can imagine is that they will dump it into the ocean because nobody will want to take the responsibility of storing it or burning in a facilities...
Quote
Firstly I do not think the government is doing right.
Killing so many animals , destroying the resources just because they don't want to give it for free to decrease their price .
This is ridiculously irrelevant , when they can actually do good and distribute it to those in need .
It would have an impact on the environment for sure because unlike the renewable sources of energy , it is not unlimited. They will destroy the natural resources plus pollution cannot be completed avoided , even if they use the secure burning facilities , they would actually use the filters to filter out the dangerous particles from it but it would inturn cost much more for the government to build a facility like this and at the same time keep changing the air filters in the chimneys .
So if they do it , they are stupid.
Killing so many animals , destroying the resources just because they don't want to give it for free to decrease their price .
This is ridiculously irrelevant , when they can actually do good and distribute it to those in need .
It would have an impact on the environment for sure because unlike the renewable sources of energy , it is not unlimited. They will destroy the natural resources plus pollution cannot be completed avoided , even if they use the secure burning facilities , they would actually use the filters to filter out the dangerous particles from it but it would inturn cost much more for the government to build a facility like this and at the same time keep changing the air filters in the chimneys .
So if they do it , they are stupid.
If only we lived in a perfect world... Honestly I think we're technologically ready for solar/alternative energies, but the economy will have to be reformed worldwide. That's not something that's in the best interests of the establishment, but hopefully we can get there some day.
Problem is , the leaders that people choose are all old and knowledgeable , I agree but they lack the perspective of a young person , in many countries there are age groups , only after which one can rule the government.
The person should be educated , young , positive and not dumb like leaders like Trump , plus we should have the power to help others in need like the North Korea , the government should have been dissolved long ago . People are treated like animals there , there are no rights , humanity is itself a crime there .
Only if the borders were erased and whole world was one country , not different nations competing for resources. Hoping is not the only thing we can do , we can get our ideas and thoughts out there , we can try and reform our society . Maybe we won't make it , but at least we would have tried.
System needs some serious reforms soon .
If they're using controlled facilities then it'll do nothing...
As long as they have things like catalytic converters then it'll just be like normal oil that would've been used anyway...
As long as they don't have an open fire and it doesn't cast too many shadows, it might be a shock these days though given the recent lack of pollution.
As long as they have things like catalytic converters then it'll just be like normal oil that would've been used anyway...
As long as they don't have an open fire and it doesn't cast too many shadows, it might be a shock these days though given the recent lack of pollution.
Sounds reassuring!
But what about the tankers full of oil that are drifting in the Pacific? The worst scenario I can imagine is that they will dump it into the ocean because nobody will want to take the responsibility of storing it or burning in a facilities...
Quote
Firstly I do not think the government is doing right.
Killing so many animals , destroying the resources just because they don't want to give it for free to decrease their price .
This is ridiculously irrelevant , when they can actually do good and distribute it to those in need .
It would have an impact on the environment for sure because unlike the renewable sources of energy , it is not unlimited. They will destroy the natural resources plus pollution cannot be completed avoided , even if they use the secure burning facilities , they would actually use the filters to filter out the dangerous particles from it but it would inturn cost much more for the government to build a facility like this and at the same time keep changing the air filters in the chimneys .
So if they do it , they are stupid.
Killing so many animals , destroying the resources just because they don't want to give it for free to decrease their price .
This is ridiculously irrelevant , when they can actually do good and distribute it to those in need .
It would have an impact on the environment for sure because unlike the renewable sources of energy , it is not unlimited. They will destroy the natural resources plus pollution cannot be completed avoided , even if they use the secure burning facilities , they would actually use the filters to filter out the dangerous particles from it but it would inturn cost much more for the government to build a facility like this and at the same time keep changing the air filters in the chimneys .
So if they do it , they are stupid.
If only we lived in a perfect world... Honestly I think we're technologically ready for solar/alternative energies, but the economy will have to be reformed worldwide. That's not something that's in the best interests of the establishment, but hopefully we can get there some day.
Firstly I do not think the government is doing right.
Killing so many animals , destroying the resources just because they don't want to give it for free to decrease their price .
This is ridiculously irrelevant , when they can actually do good and distribute it to those in need .
It would have an impact on the environment for sure because unlike the renewable sources of energy , it is not unlimited. They will destroy the natural resources plus pollution cannot be completed avoided , even if they use the secure burning facilities , they would actually use the filters to filter out the dangerous particles from it but it would inturn cost much more for the government to build a facility like this and at the same time keep changing the air filters in the chimneys .
So if they do it , they are stupid.
Killing so many animals , destroying the resources just because they don't want to give it for free to decrease their price .
This is ridiculously irrelevant , when they can actually do good and distribute it to those in need .
It would have an impact on the environment for sure because unlike the renewable sources of energy , it is not unlimited. They will destroy the natural resources plus pollution cannot be completed avoided , even if they use the secure burning facilities , they would actually use the filters to filter out the dangerous particles from it but it would inturn cost much more for the government to build a facility like this and at the same time keep changing the air filters in the chimneys .
So if they do it , they are stupid.
If they're using controlled facilities then it'll do nothing...
As long as they have things like catalytic converters then it'll just be like normal oil that would've been used anyway...
As long as they don't have an open fire and it doesn't cast too many shadows, it might be a shock these days though given the recent lack of pollution.
As long as they have things like catalytic converters then it'll just be like normal oil that would've been used anyway...
As long as they don't have an open fire and it doesn't cast too many shadows, it might be a shock these days though given the recent lack of pollution.
Hello friends!
Recently I heard some news that countries consider burning oil because there's no more place to store it.
As you know the oil production volumes are huge, and this means that a lot of oil will be burn.
So the question is, how will it affect the earth's climate? Is this a significant concern for the environmentalists?
Recently I heard some news that countries consider burning oil because there's no more place to store it.
As you know the oil production volumes are huge, and this means that a lot of oil will be burn.
So the question is, how will it affect the earth's climate? Is this a significant concern for the environmentalists?
Jump to: