It's great if the reputable members of BTC-talk will get together and form a casino. It will be one efficient platform where we can all gather and gamble while discussing with each other here in the forum.
I think that this is a good idea and I'd like to see the results. I do hope it will happen one day.
However, I think it's important that the casino should be fair, because if a lot of people are going to put their money into this casino, they want to know that they won't get cheated or scammed. This kind of project requires a lot of time and effort. It's not something that can be done in just a few days or weeks.
By the way, what casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk are you talking about?
Topic: Will You Support Casino Operated By The Bitcointalk Members - page 6. (Read 787 times)
I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
why not, I will support it if the platform they offer is honest and fair, just like what they used to do before
I don't think future conflicts will happen because everyone wants to have innovations in their lives, starting as a gambling promoter in the forum, developing into a casino owner.
This can still be done and indeed why not as long as they can be fair and indeed have a good reputation I have no problem playing there although indeed this can still be called testing but I'm fine.
We gamble not only to see who is behind the casino but whether they can be honest and not carry the name bitcointalk I think I will be happy with that because of course indirectly if there is then they are friends but in the principle of friendship is different from business so even if they are on the forum but when it comes to bad casinos why play there.
We gamble not only to see who is behind the casino but whether they can be honest and not carry the name bitcointalk I think I will be happy with that because of course indirectly if there is then they are friends but in the principle of friendship is different from business so even if they are on the forum but when it comes to bad casinos why play there.
Indeed, if one of the trusted members here in the forum manages to create a casino, it will receive the support of the majority and I am one of them. I don't think trusted members here will find it difficult to manage the project, especially if they have a lot of money.
I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
Yes if they have good bonuses and promotion that is better on the existing crypto casino. Trust issue on crypto casino is not a big deal anymore because there are already many casino that proved there honesty for more than many years of operating without any major issue. So even if the casino is owned by trusted user here or not as long as they provide a good service and have a gambling license then I don’t mind playing at all on this casino.
This owner background thing is not a huge factor anymore on choosing casino due to a lot of available reputable casino out there.
I think it's okay for a reputable member to create a casino, however just because the member has a good reputation doesn't mean the casino already has a guaranteed good reputation. We have to know how to separate things, a person may be good at investigating scammers and scam casinos, but that person will be a failure in running a casino. That's why even if a reputable member creates a casino and posts it here on the forum people should look at the casino with the same eyes of suspicion they have when a new casino is posted on the forum
I agree with you, but we can't forget that as new altcoin creators do on this forum, casino guys are the same thing: in the first few days they are very active on the forum, but after months they disappear from the forum and claim that they are very busy, It's always like that
The only thing it has an advantage of compared to others is that I at least know to a certain point the team behind it and I know how to contact them or make them notice my issue directly without any difficulty
I agree with you, but we can't forget that as new altcoin creators do on this forum, casino guys are the same thing: in the first few days they are very active on the forum, but after months they disappear from the forum and claim that they are very busy, It's always like that
if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them...
A reputable bitcointalk member starting a casino will try as much as possible to ensure that his casino is of quality having been exposed to the casino environment and other reputable casino's that have active campaigns here. I would support a casino operated by a not just any bitcointalk member, but trusted and reputable members. 
I'm sure they know what they are doing and will come out with the best casino that members of Bitcointalk can trust and enjoy, they know the business well they know the in and out and they know what players are looking for, I can easily trust them but will treat them like all the other casinos here, I will criticize when there's a need to criticize and will suggest when there's something they overlooked and I'm sure they will try to establish a good reputation here since they have names to protect here and it took them years to established these names.
It depends. In the end, I'm a customer and the casino would be a business, if the business fails to live up to a set of standards that I've set beforehand, then even if I was a member of BTCtalk, I wouldn't support it. The only thing it has an advantage of compared to others is that I at least know to a certain point the team behind it and I know how to contact them or make them notice my issue directly without any difficulty, not to mention that this forum would be similar to the forums of some casinos so the community would've already been set in stone even before the casino was fully fleshed out, making discussions about it rather abundant.
I don't think there'd be much conflict, most managers here were hired and that's it. As long as they don't multi manage (if allowed then ig its okay) I think it's fine.
I don't think there'd be much conflict, most managers here were hired and that's it. As long as they don't multi manage (if allowed then ig its okay) I think it's fine.
Definitely.
I've been playing with PrimeDice for a long time now and Stunna has been amazing and active all throughout the years, addressing lots of concerns himself and directing the said platform to success. Now with Stake, he's even more active and even more engaging with a lot of us members in here. Some successful casinos and exchanges were spawned from this very forum over the years, although obviously not every platform made it up to now.
Why would there be a conflict of interest? If they reviewed previous casinos, does that mean that they shouldn't have the right to create their own? As long as they are not tarnishing other crypto casinos' name, it's fine by me.
I've been playing with PrimeDice for a long time now and Stunna has been amazing and active all throughout the years, addressing lots of concerns himself and directing the said platform to success. Now with Stake, he's even more active and even more engaging with a lot of us members in here. Some successful casinos and exchanges were spawned from this very forum over the years, although obviously not every platform made it up to now.
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
Why would there be a conflict of interest? If they reviewed previous casinos, does that mean that they shouldn't have the right to create their own? As long as they are not tarnishing other crypto casinos' name, it's fine by me.
I will not give them special treatment but will definitely look at how they handle issues and questions about their casino, but I'm sure they are fully aware of how a good casino does their business, so I expect a high standard because they are experienced and they know the casino business, there's a possibility that we already have members that are already running casinos but they are handling it with their alternative account, Lighlord is considered a member of this forum being one of the early donators and he has proven that an admin can also be part of Bitcoin community.
my support will depend on how the member/s handles the Casino. supporting someone's Business(in this case an online casino) should not be based on whether he/she is a reputable member of this forum. anyway, if a reputed member of this forum decides to create his/her own casino I'll have high expectations but my support will still depend on how he/she handles the casino.
I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them
Yeah, why not especially if these reputable members already have some good background on gambling-related things and how to run it. If ever there will be a casino that will be created by members of the forum, I think they will collaborate with some existing casinos and will try to offer all the things that other casino lacks either on design, games and services. Will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
No, I don't think that it will be a conflict of interest if ever they did promote some casinos before as those will only prove that they had a background in gambling and casinos. Also, I don't think that existing users will try to create a casino as there are already reputable members that are already in collaboration with some online casinos on their promotions, advertisements, and other services. Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
~ but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them
I don't mind if games in the platform are provably fair and there's proof that funds are available for the casino. Maybe it's a plus if team owners are composed of known BTT members.and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Well, it could have a negative impact on the image/branding of the casino if the platform was already launched and they're still promoting another one. Some people might also think owners don't have enough money. If they stopped, then all good. 
I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
Why not? If they can show that they have available huge amount to pay to their possible winners then they can legitimately run a business here. Also there are forum users like @lightlord which is donator on this forum running a business and there are other more.
If new reputable forum user will create a new casino well maybe the same with other we still need to be vigilant because there reputation will not count since what matter the most is the way handle the casino and how it perform.
I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.
Jump to: