How?
I think he meant the race to the nuclear centrals, the race to more power, the race to more and more energy.
Most of the people on the earth had nothing to do with that.
hmm...right. That's like saying the cells in your feet are innocent and have nothing to do with your crime because after all it was your finger that pressed the trigger I know this might be a little deep but seriously try thinking beyond your comfort zone.
Did the Amish want to build nuclear power plants? Did the tribes in the Amazon want their trees destroyed? Why are there protesters and opposition to building these plants if all of humanity wants them built?
Step out of your comfort zone of blaming everyone, (thus saying it was going to happen no matter what), and realize that blaming humanity is a scapegoat and taking the blame off of those who actually pushed for such things.
Is it really that hard to see that humans stand as one or do you just prefer not to see it? It doesn't matter where you are in the world, it doesn't matter that you've lived your whole life as a recluse in a cave away from civilization, your humanity is rooted a lot deeper than you can reach using will.
Also you should re-read my comments more carefully, I do not use words lightly. I have not actually blamed anyone for anything, I have merely stated facts (albeit hard-to-wrap-your-head-around facts).
My first comment is referencing op's highlighted text.
You seem to have a block against seeing that humans are free to think as they will, and do NOT agree with each other. If you think there is a consciousness that is leading our human race to a certain goal, you'd be right, but it's not humanity, lol.
Agreement and disagreement, love and war are one and the same, humans stand as one against everything else. Humanity and the 'consciousness' you speak of are one and the same, without it you wouldn't be human, you'd be a regular animal. Humans are 'free to think' within a very well-defined space, good and evil are illusions that exist only within that space. Attempts to move beyond that region only increases its reach, it moves with you because you accept it to be you. It is not possible to think outside the box because the box and the outside are one and the same. People prefer to believe it is possible because without hope they couldn't exist within that space.
1 John 4:18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves punishment, and the one who fears is not perfected in love.
Love and war are not the same, and I think most would disagree with you just based on that statement alone.
Humans do not stand as one, ever. They may join together with others, but there is no way "humanity" is standing as one. Maybe you're thinking of the borg from Star Trek TNG?
The consciousness that would want to lead men and women to destruction is evil. I know you won't agree with it, but it's clearly not what men and women were put here to do. You didn't answer my question about the Amish. It's quite clear to me some men and women are able to live with this earth in peace and harmony. Some men and women are not. That's pretty clear from the history of the world, and you seem blind to it.
It is no longer possible to make progress along these lines so this will be my last comment.
You will only ever be able to skim the surface with your probing/analysis because you've set indestructible pillars from within your world, pillars that you fall back on for support. You'll be pleased(?) to learn that I am incapable of breaching your defenses. However, you should know that while providing you with a safe/comfort zone these pillars also limit the infinite scope of you to a mere definition.
The answer to any question you may have on the topic at hand is to be found within my comments in this thread.
Your theory that all of humanity is responsible for mistreating this earth is flawed, and you've just ignored the fact that many men and women can live on this earth and not want to mess it up. They can actually plant things, fish, live off the land without using power. The only way your theory would be worth listening to, is if you would actually argue for your position.
I've laid out the facts, and you ignore them and move on and act as if you're right, but your theory can't be right if at least one person wants nothing to do with the kind of greed that drives people to create nuclear power plants and cars, etc. If all men and women have the same driving force of "humanity" then they would be powerless to stop it. Instead, I hypothesize that it's evil that it causing people to be greedy and power-hungry, and unable to relax and enjoy the earth as it is. And there are plenty of men and women out there who can be free from that force and actually relax and enjoy earth without damaging it. But c'est la vie.
You're right, it's not worth arguing about it if you're going to ignore facts and continue to move on with the, IMHO, flawed theory.