Topic: Win 100 BTC by becoming the first Satoshi Superstar! - page 7. (Read 21811 times)
Oh, just go ahead and invite him to join. It couldn't be any weirder than the names already on the list...
Current List of First Season Contestants:
More than halfway there!
- Tuxavant
- squidroe
- LoupGaroux
- Phinnaeus Gage
- The Founder
- chris200x9
- cablepair
- Open
- Open
- Open
- Open
- Open
More than halfway there!
Sure would love to see this guy in the contest: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNgT7GPCoYk (as an added bonus, RandyFolds is in this video)
We get him, then these guys may embrace Bitcoin:
Current List of First Season Contestants:
More than halfway there!
- Tuxavant
- squidroe
- LoupGaroux
- Phinnaeus Gage
- The Founder
- chris200x9
- cablepair
- Open
- Open
- Open
- Open
- Open
More than halfway there!
Earlier in this thread it was said, TWICE, that only judge's votes will count. Anyone else sending in satoshis will be throwing their money away.
Judges' Votes will be measured in bitcoins and the weight given to each Judge's vote will vary for each Round. Audience/Visitor Votes can be as small or as large as you like, but are intended to serve primarily as tie-breakers in the elimination rounds. Anyone trying to "buy" the Grand Prize by voting for themselves could very easily still lose the contest in the Final Round if the Judges pick someone else's submission as the best, unless, of course, they send in more BTC than the prize itself is actually worth.
Once the first Season begins and things are put into practice, I believe the way this contest is meant to work will be easier to grasp. I realize that by attempting to keep things ambiguous and mysterious enough to pique public interest I may have overshot the mark and strayed into "confusing" and "suspicious." Needless to say, that was not my intent; I want to give away 100 BTC and am only asking for Contestants and Judges for some time and effort.
I also want to point out that votes need not be sent in one satoshi at a time. Votes will be measured in satoshis, however. For example, if Contestant A receives a vote of 0.001 BTC in their voting address, it will be counted as 100000 votes and a vote of 0.00100001 will count as 1000001 votes. Again, I realize that using the smallest unit of measurement for bitcoins as the benchmark may have caused some of this confusion, but Satoshi Superstars just seemed much catchier than "Bitcent Superstars."
Well thought out explanation. Satoshi Superstars does have a nice ring to it, whereas Bitcent Superstars could eventually been referred to as BS. Wait, what? SS! What kind of shit you tryin' to pull, edd?
~Bruno~
Earlier in this thread it was said, TWICE, that only judge's votes will count. Anyone else sending in satoshis will be throwing their money away.
Judges' Votes will be measured in bitcoins and the weight given to each Judge's vote will vary for each Round. Audience/Visitor Votes can be as small or as large as you like, but are intended to serve primarily as tie-breakers in the elimination rounds. Anyone trying to "buy" the Grand Prize by voting for themselves could very easily still lose the contest in the Final Round if the Judges pick someone else's submission as the best, unless, of course, they send in more BTC than the prize itself is actually worth.
Once the first Season begins and things are put into practice, I believe the way this contest is meant to work will be easier to grasp. I realize that by attempting to keep things ambiguous and mysterious enough to pique public interest I may have overshot the mark and strayed into "confusing" and "suspicious." Needless to say, that was not my intent; I want to give away 100 BTC and am only asking for Contestants and Judges for some time and effort.
I also want to point out that votes need not be sent in one satoshi at a time. Votes will be measured in satoshis, however. For example, if Contestant A receives a vote of 0.001 BTC in their voting address, it will be counted as 100000 votes and a vote of 0.00100001 will count as 1000001 votes. Again, I realize that using the smallest unit of measurement for bitcoins as the benchmark may have caused some of this confusion, but Satoshi Superstars just seemed much catchier than "Bitcent Superstars."
Earlier in this thread it was said, TWICE, that only judge's votes will count. Anyone else sending in satoshis will be throwing their money away.
I think that was just in the final round though... anyone can vote in earlier rounds.This is exactly correct.
Quote
self-satoshi-ize
Next time, post an image.
Earlier in this thread it was said, TWICE, that only judge's votes will count. Anyone else sending in satoshis will be throwing their money away.
I think that was just in the final round though... anyone can vote in earlier rounds. 
Earlier in this thread it was said, TWICE, that only judge's votes will count. Anyone else sending in satoshis will be throwing their money away.
I've heard that auto-satoshi-ing makes you go blind so I, for one, pledge not to self-satoshi-ize for the duration of my tenure in the contest.
Of course the voices in my head have their own accounts and wallets so I cannot be held responsible for what they do.
Of course the voices in my head have their own accounts and wallets so I cannot be held responsible for what they do.
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
You're sending Satoshi's - a poor person could do it too. 
Also, the judges balance things out with their own votes (which are worth much more than the "normal" person's vote).
so basically there's just an illusion of community involvment?
It's BOTH. I don't know what the weighting is, but people from the community vote, and the judges vote as well. Edd'll have to chime in with how much both types of votes matter though.
I agree! The more we know, the better we can game the system. I've just set up my auto-satoshier. The more info I have, the better I can program it.
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
You're sending Satoshi's - a poor person could do it too. Also, the judges balance things out with their own votes (which are worth much more than the "normal" person's vote).
so basically there's just an illusion of community involvment?
It's BOTH. I don't know what the weighting is, but people from the community vote, and the judges vote as well. Edd'll have to chime in with how much both types of votes matter though.
I agree! The more we know, the better we can game the system. I've just set up my auto-satoshier. The more info I have, the better I can program it.
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
You're sending Satoshi's - a poor person could do it too. Also, the judges balance things out with their own votes (which are worth much more than the "normal" person's vote).
so basically there's just an illusion of community involvment?
It's BOTH. I don't know what the weighting is, but people from the community vote, and the judges vote as well. Edd'll have to chime in with how much both types of votes matter though.
so basically there's just an illusion of community involvment?
Electoral college anyone?
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
You're sending Satoshi's - a poor person could do it too. Also, the judges balance things out with their own votes (which are worth much more than the "normal" person's vote).
so basically there's just an illusion of community involvment?
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
You're sending Satoshi's - a poor person could do it too. Also, the judges balance things out with their own votes (which are worth much more than the "normal" person's vote).
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
That's the way I understood it as well. I'm still a "maybe" on this, but it sounds like fun.
I was really excited about this since I could use 100 btc but if I understand the rules correctly this is the dumbest contest I've ever heard of. Basically you are giving the person with the most btc 100 more btc. Due to bitcoins nature a rich person could generate hundreds of addresses and vote for themself and it would look like different people.
Listen- my sister is upset that somebody stole her hair brush from the gas station restroom just to get all those lovely red hairs. The laugh is on that scoundrel- those were emu hairs that she collected brushing the emus at dear old (really old, and now ex-) Uncle Elmo's Emu Emporium. Now we had to get them all prettied up without the benefit of the aforementioned brush to prep them for a fun field trip to the emu-abbatoir.
Yup, that's the idea- emu-burgers, filet du emu, lovely kid friendly emu-fingers for the little knee-biters in the audience. Hook 'em, book 'em, and cook 'em, in the finest Upton Sinclair tradition, beat the filler and non-food products stuffing out of the beef industry, be the first to market adopters of the new emu-food craze and start taking the emu ghosts to the bank in the form of simmoleans, all bought through the good offices of the profits from the soon-to-be-established chain of McElmo's Fast Emu, with drive thru and kiddy playland, which will be the first international restaurant chain to accept bitcoins, pay their staff in bitcoins, and shift all of our profits offshore to a Korean bitcoin data-haven.
Profit? Check.
Honoring Uncle Elmo? Check.
Bitcoin-centric economic model? Check.
Cleaning up the whole, "what do you do with an emu do you?" thing? Priceless.
Yup, that's the idea- emu-burgers, filet du emu, lovely kid friendly emu-fingers for the little knee-biters in the audience. Hook 'em, book 'em, and cook 'em, in the finest Upton Sinclair tradition, beat the filler and non-food products stuffing out of the beef industry, be the first to market adopters of the new emu-food craze and start taking the emu ghosts to the bank in the form of simmoleans, all bought through the good offices of the profits from the soon-to-be-established chain of McElmo's Fast Emu, with drive thru and kiddy playland, which will be the first international restaurant chain to accept bitcoins, pay their staff in bitcoins, and shift all of our profits offshore to a Korean bitcoin data-haven.
Profit? Check.
Honoring Uncle Elmo? Check.
Bitcoin-centric economic model? Check.
Cleaning up the whole, "what do you do with an emu do you?" thing? Priceless.
Emus For Bitcoins
Your eccentric, Libertarian uncle recently passed away and mentioned you in his will. You and your cousins (Contestants) are gathered together to hear the details. His emu farm was the only thing of value he left behind and your uncle made provisions to leave it to only one descendant. You must present a business plan to the executors of his estate (Judges) outlining how you would not only maintain but grow the business accepting only bitcoins as a means of payment, according to your late uncle’s wishes. Assuming that the farm is currently only breaking even but has a good line of credit at the local bank, has no assets to speak of (other than the physical property and the emus) but no significant debt either, convince the Judges that you have the best plan to honor your uncle’s memory.
Seems like this contest will be a great way to explore the other side of bitcoin -- you know, the less technical one.
Matthew isn't Korean, either, so... well said!
Is Lurch in or out of this competition? Inquiring minds want to know.
I hope MousePotato gets in.
Would love to see a newbie enter.
To round out the field, some guy with over 200,000 Twitter followers like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGfQk9XXm24
Just give me the word, and I'll call him.
~Bruno~
Jump to: