I believe that Trump's decision to support the crypto industry is a logical and positive step in his campaign. At the moment, people are greatly concerned about this issue and the actions of the current administration have caused fears among the public, which could affect the election results.
When political hands started to play, the support was very massive, plus Trump finally dismantled his principles from being anti-crypto to being pro. Keep in mind that this is all about politics and Bitcoin is being used as a tool to get votes. Trump sees Biden negative votes in the Bitcoin community, therefore making Trump have additional votes if he declares pro Bitcoin. In political competition, things like this often happen, taking advantage of voices that are at odds with the current government.
Ouch, it's unfortunate when highly powerful people make decisions like this. Biden's administration isn't friendly to cryptos, I admit it. But I think Trump is just playing a temporary game of pretending to be pro-Bitcoin so that he can get some votes out of it, whereas in the past he's been consistently anti-Bitcoin. It seems like it isn't their first major support for Republicans, as they supported Blake Masters (Arizona). Masters lost despite getting attention and generous support of billionaires. I hope the same will happen to Trump, although I must admit that Biden isn't a particularly good option.
Do you think it's fair for us to keep bringing up other people's past to judge them in the present? It is true that he has criticized and opposed bitcoin in the past, but many years have passed and he may have changed his opinion on bitcoin. We have seen many investors change their opinion about bitcoin and we always congratulate them for finding the truth, so why are we always upset with Mr. Trump?
Furthermore, even retail investors like us know that he has been against bitcoin, or he is pretending to be pro-bitcoin just because he wants to get more votes. Do you think other people like the Winklevoss twins don't know about it? Maybe they even met Mr. Trump directly to confront him about this, but they still decided to support him. Do you think they are more stupid than us?
I'm not from America and don't care who wins, but the fact that many high powered people support Mr. Trump is something that makes us think.
On the other hand, the arrival of the Winklevoss twins was a big reference because they were able to make an agreement so that the crypto and Bitcoin community was given more free space in the US. At least the Winklevoss twins are considered capable of representing the hopes of Bitcoin retail investors. In other words the Winklevoss twins "I will support you and make a donation, but with the condition of Bitcoin in the US......" that's the picture because there can't be $2 million given away for free, at least there is an agreement made by the Winklevoss twins .
