Topic: WITHDRAWN - page 5. (Read 5249 times)

I don't agree with account selling and never will. However it has been confirmed on many occasions by other staff members that it is allowed and there are many sellers in the digital services trading section that get away with it daily. Selectively punishing people who take it as collateral is like kicking a man when he is down - pretty dirty. Just ban it altogether and far fewer accounts will be traded in this way.

Why are they valid?  Just because you do not condone it?  So if you do not condone wearing t-shirts on Wednesdays, we should all stop wearing t-shirts?

I am not sure exactly how you stumbled across this account.  If it was one account, I would say coincidences, but you have 4 of my collateral held accounts tagged with less than 30 (-) comments and under 40 bad loans with accounts as collateral in the last 2-3 months.

can not figure out how to properly research before you leave feedback, the loan reference is here:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16312515

What methods do you seem to use??  I see no pattern in anything you did with the feedback you left in the month of November, other than abuse the DT rating you had.  Some of the accounts you tagged have not been active for over 2 months.  

My first message to you was asking what happened and what I needed to do to fix it, yet your response was?? (I bonded it in purple to refresh your memory) How was that "willing to work this out"?  

You were willing to work this out???

In my opinion, the only reason the accounts have value is because of the signature campaigns.  If someone purchases an account so they can earn more in a signature campaign, it would be a good investment, which is the only reason I would think one would want to purchase an account.  Lets work together and prevent the accounts from being sold for scamming purposes by all loaners agreeing to neutral tag every account the day it is sold as being sold on this day.  This tag would ideally have something stating in it that the account was sold and that no previous trust should be considered.  To give it purpose, I suggest that all ligament tags should have a reference back to the collateral loan where the account was lost.  I understand how account sales give scammers the opportunity to get over on people, but this would warn people which accounts have been purchased and which accounts were not.   

What most are not understanding, no offence high ranking members; however, anything can have a value to someone else.  It does not matter if it has a value to you or if it does not, if someone else has a purpose for it, then it has a value.   How many people throw away their plastic milk jugs after they are done being used?  Better yet, how many people send them to recycling?  Why do you do it?  Most people will answer because it is garbage.  Now if someone told you how you could come across 100,000 of those a day with very little effort and each one of them are worth $.012 USD, would throw them all away?  Most people would answer no.  The same goes with the accounts, they will always have value as long as someone else has a use for them. 

As far as not taking accounts for collateral, there is nothing wrong with that because they have a value.  If they did not have value, there would be no price estimator for the accounts.

Take that away and have it against the rules to do this and I will stop. Just because you are not making nothing from it does not mean nothing.

I have counted another 25 accounts currently up for auction from newbies, did you tag them? No you did not.

Look at all the feedback you left lately, you are abusing the system.

If you were not and you were concerned with this forum, like you say, you would have been tagging for the past years, not just this month.

I CALL YOUR BS buddy.

This is only one of the three accounts you tagged for no reason and 2 of them were no for sale by anyone yet, so why were they tagged???

If they did not have value, there would be no price estimator for the accounts.

As far as your Newbie account selling it, I call BS because when you did it, I contacted you from my one and only account, this SR.

Account and your still blew it off as I was crying.  

I have counted another 25 accounts currently up for auction from newbies, did you tag them?  No you did not.

Look at all the feedback you left lately, you are abusing the system.  If you were not and you were concerned with this forum, like you say, you would have been tagging for the past years, not just this month.  I CALL YOUR BS buddy.

Staff member using his position to abuse the feedback system.

Amount Scammed: .20+ (Collateral Value)

What happened:  Staff member using his position to abuse the feedback system.

I didn't think the trust system was a feedback system. Am I wrong? I just thought you stated whether you trusted someone or not.