Pages:
Author

Topic: [WO/Hat-Gang Only - MODERATED] The fucking COVID vax thread (No hat? Fuck off!) - page 5. (Read 6922 times)

member
Activity: 61
Merit: 47
I don't know, I don't want to get too conspiratorial either, but the other day I saw Rand Paul talking about the same thing: that the statistics had been inflated by including as Covid cases and Covid deaths completely asymptomatic people who had been admitted to hospitals, etc. for other causes.

This is why I have always questioned the reported cases numbers. This inflation of numbers was admitted in press conferences as far back as April, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw9Ci2PZKZg


Another thing about asymptomatic people that seems to have been memory holed: the WHO Technical Lead saying, according to the studies and data they have, it's "very rare" for asymptomatic people to pass on the virus:https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/06/08/who-coronavirus-patients-who-dont-show-symptoms-arent-spreading-new-infections.html

They came out a day or two later trying to walk back her statement, and the only thing they could say was, "computer models make it look way worse", but according to the data they have in the real world, it is very rare.

---------------------------------


It clearly says "VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness".
...
No, it doesn't say that the data "may or may not be valid" (for determining the number of adverse events caused by vaccines). It clearly says that the data is not valid for that purpose - "cannot be used", doesn't get any more definitive than that.

Quote
"VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events...  This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.”

1. It can detect patterns of adverse events, but can not be used to to determine if adverse events occur? This is GIGO (Garbage in, Garbage out). Either the entire system is useless, or the data is valid (mostly valid? whatever sliding scale you'd like to use) => may, or may not be valid...
2. The statement "VAERS shows 18,000 people died" is a true statement. Did 18,000 people actually die? Maybe; maybe more, maybe less. VAERS is limited, but that doesn't make it inherently false.

Unless, the data is valid:

Quote
"Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public."

Has anyone with access to the Gov, updated version invalidated the claims made by "conspiritards"? Or do you use a blanket statement that contradicts itself to "debunk" it? The updated data is there, why hasn't it been shared?


legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
It's almost as if distancing and masks may slow the spread of some infections.

But yet had zero effect of slowing the spread of Covid during the same period. Quite odd.

You forgot to supply the data or even a screenshot from twitbook.
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 5069
It's almost as if distancing and masks may slow the spread of some infections.

But yet had zero effect of slowing the spread of Covid during the same period. How odd.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I guess we will never know, because the tracking of that other thing suspiciously dropped off the charts.

It's almost as if distancing and masks may slow the spread of some infections.

And if you had bothered to pay attention, you would have seen that the projected number of deaths has seasonal spikes including the flu from previous years, and excess deaths are above that. I know that you can't verbalize your own statements so perhaps you meant to say that there is no COVID but there is a very bad strain of flu going around?
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 5069
This means that if COVID-19 numbers were inflated, these people still died of something that they wouldn't have died of otherwise... so is there another pandemic that we don't know about?

I guess we will never know, because the tracking of that other thing suspiciously dropped off the charts.



legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I don't know, I don't want to get too conspiratorial either, but the other day I saw Rand Paul talking about the same thing: that the statistics had been inflated by including as Covid cases and Covid deaths completely asymptomatic people who had been admitted to hospitals, etc. for other causes.

Excess death numbers matched or exceeded reported COVID-19 deaths throughout 2020-2021, and also matched the spikes. This means that if COVID-19 numbers were inflated, these people still died of something that they wouldn't have died of otherwise... so is there another pandemic that we don't know about?

Loading...

Loading...

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Someone who was admitted to a hospital without any symptoms of coronavirus and for another cause, with a positive pcr result counted as another admission due to coronavirus, and they are going to start separating that from now on, two years later.

How conveeeeeenient for them that they didn't do that before?

I don't know, I don't want to get too conspiratorial either, but the other day I saw Rand Paul talking about the same thing: that the statistics had been inflated by including as Covid cases and Covid deaths completely asymptomatic people who had been admitted to hospitals, etc. for other causes.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 2963
Man who stares at charts
Over here, infections with mainly Omicron B1 still ramp up (at least one ATH this cycle).
Contact tracing is being turned off, "lockdown for unvaccinated"  ended, businesses are open for the unvaccinated next week, mandatory masks in elementary school will be restricted to shared spcaes out of classrooms, the vaccinated are now considered immune only for 6 months after the second shot, contact person regulations got dropped for the boostered and when said persons wore masks in presence of an infected person. The "experts" tell our goverment to do so because it's the best.
Government tries to force people to take mRNA jabs through vaccine mandate, about three months before conventional vaccines will be available for the public.

What could possibly go wrong?  Roll Eyes

Why not taking all rules out of effect, let it run, because Long Covid doesn't even exist? ("it's only psychic, muh doctor says").
Four councellors, three governments within the last three years. Say hello to Banana Country.  Roll Eyes Sad
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
GOD or Vaccine choice is yours!!!

Cyprus Orthodox Church threatens to suspend priests if they refuse to get vaccinated



https://aje.io/chau9h
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 5069
No, it doesn't say that the data "may or may not be valid" (for determining the number of adverse events caused by vaccines). It clearly says that the data is not valid for that purpose - "cannot be used", doesn't get any more definitive than that.

Yeah, let's just go over and check the vaccine(s) own clinical trial data and see what....

...oh wait.  Roll Eyes 🤡🤡

Someone who was admitted to a hospital without any symptoms of coronavirus and for another cause, with a positive pcr result counted as another admission due to coronavirus, and they are going to start separating that from now on, two years later.

How conveeeeeenient for them that they didn't do that before?
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 4373
diamond-handed zealot
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
How does that unsubstantiate the claim, I don't see any numbers of deaths in that statement?

It clearly says "VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness". Which is directly contradicting what all those muppets using VAERS data are doing - assuming that VAERS data is showing the number of deaths caused by the vaccines. It's not.
 
The entire thing is one big CYA essentially saying the data may or may not be valid. If anything, that statement confirms his claim that the data contained in VAERS is underreported.

No, it doesn't say that the data "may or may not be valid" (for determining the number of adverse events caused by vaccines). It clearly says that the data is not valid for that purpose - "cannot be used", doesn't get any more definitive than that.

member
Activity: 61
Merit: 47
That disclaimer doesn't mean shit. Nice try at gaslighting though.

The disclaimer means that VAERS data does not substantiate your "18000+ recorded deaths" statement. Referring to VAERS as the source of such claim is a blatant lie.
How does that unsubstantiate the claim, I don't see any numbers of deaths in that statement?
 
The entire thing is one big CYA essentially saying the data may or may not be valid. If anything, that statement confirms his claim that the data contained in VAERS is underreported.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
I don't know if it has been mentioned in the thread but recently I have heard politicians and health authorities where I live say that they are going to distinguish now between patients (and deaths) due to coronavirus and those with coronavirus (usually asymptomatic). Which is to say that the statistics have been inflated.

Some time ago I already posted a debate in the Irish parliament about it in the P&S section. Someone who was admitted to a hospital without any symptoms of coronavirus and for another cause, with a positive pcr result counted as another admission due to coronavirus, and they are going to start separating that from now on, two years later.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
That disclaimer doesn't mean shit. Nice try at gaslighting though.

The disclaimer means that VAERS data does not substantiate your "18000+ recorded deaths" statement. Referring to VAERS as the source of such claim is a blatant lie.
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 5069
Keep in mind that with 2.7M+ ADRs and 18,000 recorded deaths (~1% of underreported deaths in VAERS) in a year

Another debunked nonsense. VAERS data comes with the following disclaimer, which conspiratards completely ignore because it doesn't fit the doomsday narrative:

blah blah blah

That disclaimer doesn't mean shit. Nice try at gaslighting though.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Keep in mind that with 2.7M+ ADRs and 18,000 recorded deaths (~1% of underreported deaths in VAERS) in a year

Another debunked nonsense. VAERS data comes with the following disclaimer, which conspiratards completely ignore because it doesn't fit the doomsday narrative:

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

 - Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.
 - Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
 - The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
 - VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
 - VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public.
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 3614
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
But it's kind of sad to some of us, that you folks that thought so little of the ability of your own innate immune system to handle things, that you rushed out to get an experimental, risky vaccine shot (perhaps multiple times) with an absolutely horrible track record.

i support giving MY immune system a heads up as to what may be coming down the pike at it.

yes thats right i dont fight fair with infections, ill take whatever advantage i can get and hand it to my immune system to take care of.

i mean its not the SHOT that helps prevent severe infections, its still the immune system that does the fighting.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 2963
Man who stares at charts
I'm a pro-vaxxer. Surprised?
Let me explain: I see conventional, sterilizing vaccines (measles, smallpox...), which underwent a full approval process and turned out to be +99,999% safe as a gain for humanity. I also most likely will welcome the upcoming vaccines on the market that are about to finish phase-3, use the full, sterilized virus. These type of vaccines are not as "effective" as mRNA, so they say, but remember that the mRNA vaxx weren't tested as thoroughly, study details were classified by their vendors, while you can read something about their true effectiveness (EDIT: and (un)safety, most important) out of the stats made in the last year, which you also have to search for under the radar sometimes.

I am always open to criticism on (conventional, safe, correctly reviewed) vaccines, too. I don't try to paint the world using only black and white.

A person that believes in safe, effective vaccines is not in my mind a "fanatical pro-vaxxer". I too believe in safe, effective vaccines, so does that make me a pro-vaxxer?

Had 3 shots .lived with 2 people while they had the virus,shared bathrooms and bed but I never tested positive for covid so in my case it worked.

Or so you believe. Typical logical fallacy on display.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.59044083

For me it's a ballance of risk. My age I smoke(green) and don't like the prospect of suffocating

I can only go on my own experience.

Can't be bothered to squabble with anyone,especially here.
It's every man for himself as I see it


Like I said I'm pro choice 😎

For the record I had 2×Oxford 1× moderna booster

While cannabinoid acid(s) in the (green) herbs are good against catching and widly replicating SARS-CoV-2, too.
I think i even posted a link to the study here. Can't remember if it was in-vitro or in-vivo study.

But whatevs, it's your life. Just don't support mandates, it's tyranny.

Clearly. And they are used (but less useful) to keep the wrecked health system running (more like going, but yeah).
What i am so upset about is that even when it's "individual choice" people base their choice on incomplete or faked information.
Vendors say mRNA is safe, so they have to be safe, right?
We know a lot better now, but we're still a minority.
People are manipulated into making "right" choices for too long now. Either we are fuck dumb as a species or this circus will blow up soon.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2191
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
Like you said, every person to themselves.

But it's kind of sad to some of us, that you folks that thought so little of the ability of your own innate immune system to handle things, that you rushed out to get an experimental, risky vaccine shot (perhaps multiple times) with an absolutely horrible track record.

Just because you survived or didn't feel any after effects, does not even mean that it was even effective, in any way. The irony is that you'll probably catch Covid at some point regardless, even with all the shots and/or boosters.

Thanks for your concern I will take it under consideration 🙂
Pages:
Jump to: