Pages:
Author

Topic: Wolf's XMR GPU Miner - page 20. (Read 117592 times)

sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 251
September 03, 2016, 09:37:25 PM
#27
GPU mining works OK for me so far on Ubuntu 14.04.  With CPU mining the program doesn't terminate properly with ctrl-c, but CPU only gets me 14-15H/s per core.
hero member
Activity: 698
Merit: 500
September 03, 2016, 05:50:27 PM
#26
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
September 03, 2016, 11:05:28 AM
#25
@dephcon: can't you read: no opencl headers found in your system.

shouldn't that be included with either the amdgpupro drivers for the application?  I've only had experience installing/using claymore's ETH miner.
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
September 03, 2016, 09:41:47 AM
#24
Can someone post his conf file while mining in Dwarf? There is some authentication issue and is not accepting the format of -u like "exchange-wallet.payment-id.worker" like it's suggested in Dwarf.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
September 03, 2016, 09:31:34 AM
#23
@dephcon: can't you read: no opencl headers found in your system.


Wolf0 do you have an idea why your miner gives low-diff shares with AMD's radeon pro driver (just my guess maybe other reasons):

Code:
[16:24:05] Setting up GPU(s).
[16:24:10] Successfully connected to pool's stratum.
[16:24:10] New job at diff 5000
[16:24:13] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 578.39H/s
[16:24:15] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.51H/s
[16:24:16] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.52H/s
[16:24:17] Share rejected (Low difficulty share): 0/1 (0.00%)
[16:24:17] Total Hashrate: 579.52H/s

[16:24:18] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.76H/s
[16:24:20] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.31H/s
[16:24:22] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.21H/s
[16:24:24] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.31H/s
[16:24:26] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.19H/s
[16:24:26] Share rejected (Low difficulty share): 0/2 (0.00%)
[16:24:26] Total Hashrate: 579.19H/s

[16:24:27] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 576.54H/s
[16:24:29] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.26H/s
[16:24:31] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.23H/s
[16:24:33] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.22H/s
[16:24:35] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.13H/s
[16:24:36] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.32H/s
[16:24:38] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.06H/s
[16:24:40] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.08H/s
[16:24:42] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.01H/s
[16:24:44] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.09H/s
[16:24:46] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.03H/s
[16:24:46] Share rejected (Low difficulty share): 0/3 (0.00%)
[16:24:46] Total Hashrate: 579.03H/s

[16:24:47] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 579.17H/s
[16:24:48] Share rejected (Low difficulty share): 0/4 (0.00%)
[16:24:48] Total Hashrate: 579.17H/s

[16:24:49] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 576.20H/s
[16:24:51] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Ellesmere: 578.88H/s
[16:24:51] Share rejected (Low difficulty share): 0/5 (0.00%)
[16:24:51] Total Hashrate: 578.88H/s

same errors with Hawaiis on same rig:

Code:
[16:27:21] Thread 1, GPU ID 1, GPU Type: Hawaii: 773.43H/s
[16:27:21] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Hawaii: 748.79H/s
[16:27:21] Share rejected (Low difficulty share): 1/30 (3.33%)
[16:27:21] Total Hashrate: 1522.22H/s
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
August 31, 2016, 06:23:55 PM
#22
Why is there so much hate between you and claymore?

Mad he gets more people using his program than yours? Seriously curious.

I spent 30 mins trying to figure out how to compile your miner and make it work, whereas he has an .zip. One of the main reasons i use his... ease of entry and use.

I don't hate Claymore - me and him are fine. It's the kminer bullshit that's only a ripoff of Claymore's that I hate.

Oh sorry I misunderstood.

If you made an easy .exe or .zip of your miner id run it 50/50 Wink

I probably will soon, but there's a bug to fix for newer drivers first.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
September 03, 2016, 09:09:19 AM
#22
Wolf, I'm having trouble running make.  do you have a list of dependencies or a linux install guide?

I cloned your repo and ran:
Code:
coinhaus@miner002:~/wolf-xmr-miner$ sudo make -f Makefile
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/aesb.c -o crypto/aesb.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/aesb-x86-impl.c -o crypto/aesb-x86-impl.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/c_blake256.c -o crypto/c_blake256.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/c_groestl.c -o crypto/c_groestl.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/c_keccak.c -o crypto/c_keccak.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/c_jh.c -o crypto/c_jh.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/c_skein.c -o crypto/c_skein.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 crypto/oaes_lib.c -o crypto/oaes_lib.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 -maes cryptonight.c -o cryptonight.o
cryptonight.c: In function ‘cryptonight_hash_aesni’:
cryptonight.c:381:18: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  uint64_t *dst = &ctx->long_state[c[0] & 0x1FFFF0];
                  ^
cryptonight.c:424:10: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘keccakf’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  keccakf(&ctx->state.hs, 24);
          ^
In file included from cryptonight.c:11:0:
crypto/c_keccak.h:22:6: note: expected ‘uint64_t * {aka long unsigned int *}’ but argument is of type ‘union hash_state *’
 void keccakf(uint64_t st[25], int norounds);
      ^
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 log.c -o log.o
log.c: In function ‘Log’:
log.c:25:10: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
   printf(timebuf);
          ^
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 net.c -o net.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 minerutils.c -o minerutils.o
gcc -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -O0 -ggdb3 -pthread -c -std=c11 gpu.c -o gpu.o
gpu.c:6:19: fatal error: CL/cl.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
Makefile:9: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 1
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
September 03, 2016, 03:37:56 AM
#21
hd7970 /// kminer /// @1000c/1500m /// custom vrom /// 620.9h/s

Won't this miner get you banned from pools since it submits duplicate shares?
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
August 31, 2016, 06:09:48 PM
#20
Why is there so much hate between you and claymore?

Mad he gets more people using his program than yours? Seriously curious.

I spent 30 mins trying to figure out how to compile your miner and make it work, whereas he has an .zip. One of the main reasons i use his... ease of entry and use.

I don't hate Claymore - me and him are fine. It's the kminer bullshit that's only a ripoff of Claymore's that I hate.
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
September 03, 2016, 01:53:02 AM
#20
Is anyone mining with linux?
I tried ubuntu 14.04, 16.04 with both gpupro and old driver.

Videocards testet: 390, 470,480.
Pools tested: dwarfpool

Error in all cases: Lowdifficultyshare
Same Problem with Claymore miner (9.1).

If you mine successfully with linux, please give details!
hero member
Activity: 803
Merit: 501
September 01, 2016, 12:14:40 AM
#19
Why is there so much hate between you and claymore?

Mad he gets more people using his program than yours? Seriously curious.

I spent 30 mins trying to figure out how to compile your miner and make it work, whereas he has an .zip. One of the main reasons i use his... ease of entry and use.

I don't hate Claymore - me and him are fine. It's the kminer bullshit that's only a ripoff of Claymore's that I hate.

Oh sorry I misunderstood.

If you made an easy .exe or .zip of your miner id run it 50/50 Wink

I probably will soon, but there's a bug to fix for newer drivers first.

@wolf once you fix the bug can compile an windows 64 build for me  if you get time ?? it will be really helpfull but anyway keep up the good work
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Active Trading on EPIC5k and Spectre.Ai
August 31, 2016, 06:16:29 PM
#18
Why is there so much hate between you and claymore?

Mad he gets more people using his program than yours? Seriously curious.

I spent 30 mins trying to figure out how to compile your miner and make it work, whereas he has an .zip. One of the main reasons i use his... ease of entry and use.

I don't hate Claymore - me and him are fine. It's the kminer bullshit that's only a ripoff of Claymore's that I hate.

Oh sorry I misunderstood.

If you made an easy .exe or .zip of your miner id run it 50/50 Wink
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
August 31, 2016, 04:28:10 PM
#17
I'm having a difficult time compiling this program. It stops out with an error saying it can't find CL/cl.h. That file is in my AMD SDK directory. Why can't it find it?  Also what version of gcc should I have to compile this?

My machine is
Intel 64bit
Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
kernel 3.19 as this is the latest kernel I can get the AMD drivers to install on

Thanks!


----- Update 1 of 2-----

Okay. I finally go it to compile by installing gcc 4.9 and following the instructions at http://superkuh.com/monero.html

Now the problem I'm having is:

./miner xmr.conf
[16:23:18] Setting up GPU(s).
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

I don't see a log file. So, I don't don't know where to go from here.

----- Update 2 of 2-----

Okay, the segfault is a similar problem I have with the claymore miner. If the miner is started and stops for any reason, I have to reboot before trying it again. 1 start per reboot is all I get.

Now I need to find the optimal settings for my HD 7970. What have others found? Right now I'm using
"corefreq": 500,
"memfreq": 1200,
"fanspeed": 80,
"powertune": 20,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 1024,
"worksize": 16

and getting about 435 H/s.  On claymore's miner I was about 480 H/s.  I this about as good as I'm going to get?  Not complaining!
member
Activity: 142
Merit: 32
August 31, 2016, 03:32:02 PM
#16
hello i become an error maybe

Win 7 64Bit

https://picload.org/image/rrpppolo/unbenannt.png
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Active Trading on EPIC5k and Spectre.Ai
August 31, 2016, 03:13:33 PM
#15
Why is there so much hate between you and claymore?

Mad he gets more people using his program than yours? Seriously curious.

I spent 30 mins trying to figure out how to compile your miner and make it work, whereas he has an .zip. One of the main reasons i use his... ease of entry and use.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
August 30, 2016, 06:12:56 AM
#14
hd7970 /// kminer /// @1000c/1500m /// 593h/s

Yeah, mine's not as good as the Claymore ripoff on Tahiti, but it's close on Hawaii. Doesn't work on Ellesmere, and I have a bug to fix on newer drivers.
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 251
August 31, 2016, 02:57:14 PM
#14
https://github.com/wolf9466/wolf-xmr-miner/releases

On my test rig wolf is -10% to claymore but also consuming 33% less power. Haven't done any tweaking yet just some quick tests.

You'll wanna play with rawintensity - should get close to equal, at least on Hawaii and up.

So 700-800h/s for a 290X?  Maybe I'll give it a try since Monero seems to have eclipsed Sia as the hot coin to mine.
legendary
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
August 31, 2016, 04:52:25 AM
#13
hd7970 /// kminer /// @1000c/1500m /// custom vrom /// 620.9h/s
legendary
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
August 30, 2016, 04:14:23 AM
#12
hd7970 /// kminer /// @1000c/1500m /// 593h/s
sr. member
Activity: 422
Merit: 251
Pasl [Xci-r.i.p.] Eth Zcl Kmd Zen Rep Xmr Sc Neo
August 30, 2016, 02:08:17 AM
#11

I didn´t manage to get any mining software functioning...except Using Minergate app my hd7950 mines at 180 H/s.
It should mine better, right! Is anyone using hd7950? How many hashes are you getting?
Pages:
Jump to: