Umm, the same guy who is filtering r/bitcoin is the one who owns this place =) So, I feel in some cases, that comment is kind of hypocritical.
EDIT: Ah I see you werent. So what got you banned for if I may ask? It is quite important to have whole picture of situation here.
The best part is I wasn't.... have never added a post to that discussion, because I feel my technical skills are not enough to weigh in. I shared a post titled "24 alternative forums and chats for Bitcoin discussion"
It was followed by a ban, then followed by a message that apologized for the ban, that I was now going to be unbanned in 3 days. I will not be back, and will be promoting other mediums of discussion in the future. It' a shame... But perhaps the biggest shame is the fact that bitcoin relies on consensus.... To achieve consensus a community needs to have un bias discussion... There is going to be spammers, FUD, bullshit and all sorts of shit. but without seeing the shit, there is a HUGE bias within ANY debate. As far as I am concerned, the discussion on reddit about all the latest topics including the blocksize, fork and xt client is basically useless, as there has clearly been a bias in the articles that have been filtered and without seeing both sides, the consensus is manipulated, or basically a false representation as all parties have not been able to voice opinion without a subjective approval. r/bitcoin is basically useless in terms of quality discussion and moving in a positive direction that doesn't directly contrast with what Bitcoin stands for.