Topic: World needs more creators and builders of smart ways not just consumers - page 2. (Read 550 times)

This is some sort of new spam post type that some people are testing, no idea why they are doing this, but those "777" people as you can see, or "2222" or whatever, they are probably all the same person and this one looks like it could be the same person as well, they just spam. The difference is, they do not share gibberish, they actually do start topics with some good logic behind it.

Like for example, the world DO need more creators, we need to keep improving the world, the way we are advancing in technology is insane for example, but there are still some ways we need to improve, like education is still lacking, health is still lacking.

For example Cancer kills about 10 million people a year, A YEAR, by logic covid killed 7 million people so far since we first saw someone having it, and the whole world went to lockdown afterwards, we all remember how people were scared of it, and yet more people die of cancer every single year, and we do not have enough advance medication for it that saves everyone easily, people still die, over ten million of them.

Sure there are improvements and advances, but obviously not enough if this many people die from it, we need to reach to a point where we can say we have a pill you take and you are better in a month or two, after 75 years of being top two reason of death, there should have been better advancement of medical world. So we definitely need people who are great creators of everything, not just consumers.

The world has mainly evolved but it's  however unfortunate it's involving fast to a hard landing surface where just a pretty few elites are benefiting mostly from everything in a teeming population of over 8 billion people. Capitalist ideal has characterized the world today that scarcely can we have any invention created without been monetized, which in all essence people don't invent forbthe sole purpose of improving humans lives but for their best interest, and I think with where we have reached there's nothing that can be done about it.

Capitalism believes the power of production and ownership should remain in the hands of some few individuals while the rest of the people are consumers. It isn't just as you simply mentioned above. Whether capitalism or not, what we are saying is there's need for more people to control resources so as to depopulate the amount of consumers by making a few of those become producers and manufacturers while also opening more opportunities for more people to control have access to their resources and contribute to the economy.

I know many countries around the world that operate this kind of economic ideology where only a few class of individuals are granted with business favors and collaborations whereas others are left at the mercy of their fate. It is usually a deliberate efforts by the government to regulate the big businesses around town to continue to maintain that capitalist driven economy.

If there are more than enough manufacturers and producers, then why are things unaffordable for people? Many people work overtimes and live paycheck to paycheck, can't afford more than food and it takes them years to buy a car or smartphone. I think that more competition makes things affordable.
For example, if you leave only Apple in smartphone business, they'll make lots of money but when the number of producers increased and companies like Xiaomi and Huawei entered the market, they pushed other companies to make more affordable smartphones with more innovations than before. High competition forces companies to find cheaper but good quality alternatives, find new ways to save money without losing quality and etc.
Btw number of consumers matter, I agree with you. Everything has to be balanced.

Actually it t is the other way around, there are more than enough manufacturers/producers/creators. We need more consumers. That’s how capitalism works. If everybody makes stuff, who is going to pay for the stuff?  More creators mean more competition. More competition means, less profits for the businesses. If the number of consumers increase, profit margins will rise. Many developed nations take immigrants into their countries because of that reason alone. It is because their enlightened citizens refuse make damn kids. They need them poor stupid immigrants that multiply like rabbits. It is good for the economy and capitalism. Yay

Lol Op we appreciate the topic but you do not need to be putting out these much lengthy posts. I don’t know if you really just have much to say but sometimes keeping it concise and simple makes a better read and becomes more attractive for members

It is also to keep ourselves on track …with a post this long, it’s very easy to get sidetracked and lose the original point
The problem is not that there are consumers but that there is too much consumers.

There honestly are a lot of cons to the ever growing consumption of most people. The main issue I have is how it affects the environment. I have seen many people buy one thing just to use it one time never again and then buy the same exact product maybe a little better and then just like the first one, throw it again. These people have no regard for the impact they make on the environment and the community.

Most inventors who created many important things we use today didn't monetise their inventions. They invented these things to make the world better. But we have the opposite now where almost everything is done for profit. The young generation doesn't care about going to school and learning professional courses. Even those in school are more focused on creating contents and promoting them on social media and earning quick money. The younger generation has a common slogan in my country "School is a scam". They prefer to join the race of social media celebrities who flaunt their wealth rather than become struggling professionals.       

Yes, they are earning lots of money, I have never said that they don't earn, I simply say that it's not fair. Today, people like KSI, XQC, Mellstroy and others earn millions of dollar via that platform and that's not really good. What do they do? Some dumb shit and sadly, people make them popular for their dumb abilities and behaviors. A person, who get PHD in science, studies quantum physics, etc, can't make money but this is the thing that's important for the society to develop and rapidly improve our quality of life even further but dumb youtubers and influencers earn more than scientists and people of other professions. Today, kids want to become youtubers and tiktokers instead of scientists engineers, doctors, physicists... I don't think this will end up well.

This is one of the most ridiculous explanations of the western sanctions I've ever seen. They had to impose sanctions over Russia because Russian wealth will "flood their system"? Really? I guess Russian companies and banks have tens of trillions of dollars at their disposal.
Most of the consumers around the world are also employees, who are earning money while working 9-to-5. The pure consumers are people, who are living out of welfare and retired pensioners. You are right about this. The world need less people living on government aid and more employees.

Creators play important role in modern time and creators are earning in Millions of dollars and we  need that kind of creators. Tik tok is good platform to market any product or any project or token ,the creator of tik tok made that and millions of people are earning through TikTok. Telegram owner is Durev and millions of people are using this platform for different purposes and they are earning by doing bounties, airdrops and many more and Twitter creator also gave good platform to perform and millions of persons are earning from that. Youtube is best platform to earn by making content and yours followers like you and they buy the project which you market . I will say thank you to You tube creator because he changed the World and now people don't need to read books.

It needs users. People who buys the coins. Put it on grid and act liquidity providers.

I get my beer.

with innovative and intelligent thinking that is needed in terms of progress that is obtained, the need for insight to survive, I think it is clear enough to conclude all this, and what is done now must follow the progress of technology to achieve and adjust the level of development that exists according to the present.

There is more benefit because a larger post will work for something that is well communicated. These things are of no use in this era, more emphasis is placed on technology because the coming era is more dependent on it. If you want to study, you can take interest in technology and computer.  It has a lot of benefits. Due to this you can eliminate many difficulties. i think no other work than these works can be done at this time, but many people will regret it after this period because there are many facilities that can provide the same because if we look in the field like technology and computer, it shows job and many things which are also connected with worldly sciences.It can be a bit difficult for us because these tasks require the brain to be active all the time. There is no coercion in this, I am telling the benefits that will support us in the future.

OP, I suggest you to create shorter posts because it's too long for the idea that you put into it. Yes, you could very shortly write that your main idea is how lesser and lesser innovators and more unskilled people we have.
At the moment, I don't like the direction we are heading towards. It looks like we prioritize fun and entertainment instead of science, engineering, biology and chemistry. It's not like that these field are dead, no, there are innovations but not at the rate you want OP and I think that's normal. Usually, wars accelerate these fields and improved quality of life decreases motivation to work in these fields because it's easier to have a good life by less mental and physical effort.
By the way, do not worry, there is a natural selection in this world, which will always do its job. If there is a demand, there will be a supply, that will happen quickly. Just have a look how rapidly medicine and absolutely everything advanced in a few decades during World Wars.

Have creativity but no resources to support it.
Have the resources to finance it all but it is very difficult to find creative people who can work together and are trustworthy.

2 important things to create maximum results when you want to provide product satisfaction for consumers. The main basic capital is being able to provide the facilities needed to create works, both in quality and quantity. The economic world never lacks creative people but the matter of resources that support smart ideas is always looked down upon. The government does not play a role in supporting local works, they look for instant ones, imported goods, famous brands while the works of the nation's children are always easily drowned out.

That is very correct that the rate of consumers has actually surpassed productions and due to low quantities of produces, it has also become an economy problems of inflations.

There is been competition on consumption sectors while there is less Interests of producers of the demanded commodities.

Most persons are after of working classes of earning payments rather than engaging on creativities which could even have as well give them medium of earning.

This is cause of the people relying too much on the government hoping they would provide all necessary amenities for them but they fails to understand that too much reliability turns exorbitant burdens to the providers.

The world has so much distanced from agricultures and are now most focused on technologies while human essential consumable commodities are being undermined.

You've covered some important points here. This not only affects trade. but also includes world economic and social development. It is true that today's generation has more resources focused on saving energy than on true innovation or creating sustainable systems. This leads to the illusion that resources are exhausted and real progress is often suppressed.

What you said about the mob mentality is interesting. This is especially true when it comes to how some rich people and business people conduct business. It is almost like they are taking advantage without having much to give back and that will make the other countries suffer in the long run. I thought we saw that translate to worldwide inequality. Where only a select few benefit to their highest degree. Others have to struggle to be able to live above mere survival. It raises questions of responsibility. Not just for the rich. but also for the community as well. When laws such as AML (anti-money laundering) or sanctions as you said are implemented. Those laws have a real-world application. But it also implies that those controls are proactive and not just an effective mechanism We're responding to those who act against the system. Many leaders and key people take their eyes off the takeover approach as creativity measures not only my prosperity but also how I think about the lives of others through innovation and equity. It can bring change. But that requires a mindset change. And that takes time.




That is a right argument. Of course, not all leaders and wealthy people put fun and profit above everything else. Anyway, there are many examples of such advanced novations and leadership in the modern world. One of the best examples might be the United Arab Emirates. as you said their steps to counteract money laundering and transition to sustainable governance prove that greed is not supported by all oligarchs.

Interestingly, the quest to openness and sustainability appears to be on course with an even broader trend. We recognize that numerous governments and businesses across the world have come to the realization that sustainable prosperity truly revolves around balancing productivity and responsibility. From this transition toward collective power and technology, it goes without saying that many incumbents are indeed aware of the weight of innovation and know how they can position themselves out of such a predicament by innovating more meaningfully for society but instead concentrate only on profits in rapid steps.


You bring up some salient questions-how different countries have different needs. The idea that the world needs more creators of smart solutions goes against the notion of moving from being a pure resource supplier to a creator and innovator. Not just sellers There are many countries having abundance of natural resources, in the best position to export raw materials, but which do not possess the required infrastructure or innovation to produce value-based goods.

This case shows the importance of investing in human resources, education, technology, and creativity so that these countries will come up with industries that are not just taking raw materials, but instead innovating and adding value to these materials. Take this case of the United Arab Emirates, which was rather dependency based on oil as a product. They are slowly diversifying into sectors like finance, technology, and even renewable energy. He argues that the countries can blossom from simple consumers of innovation to innovators and creators of the world through proper leadership and vision.

Very interesting the title of the OP post about the World needs more creators and builders of smart ways, not just consumers when I read it.

Regarding your response, it is quite relevant and allow me to compare it with some current conditions and correlate the facts to this. we see now that many countries in the world have abundant natural resources from God's gift. but it is very unfortunate that they are only spectators and consumers for these products where they can only provide raw materials to be sold. When will it progress if it continues like that in improving the welfare of its people.

Narrowing in on your references to banking, you certainly have an unusual view - that cracking down on illicit money flowing through your financial system is somehow a bad thing. Just because countries like Dubai are willing to overlook the source of the money, does not make them a good banking hub or one to be trusted over the long term. As quick as they are to take in dirty money that might not be accepted elsewhere, they'll probably end up losing it or seizing it unless you happen to be a very big fish that can benefit them over the long term and there are very few of them. It happens quite regularly, these hubs pop up as certain money flows around new laws or crackdowns in old jurisdictions, but it can dry up just as quickly. Look at Hong Kong, it used to be one of the major financial hubs in the world until China ruined it with the CCP overstepping the mark.

While the prices of things would crash hard if we could just produce more and there are limited amount of consumers for all of it, the way to do it usually happens to be either hiring more people or machinery. If you hire more people, you will have higher costs, and then you will end up not having enough profits when you sell for cheap, hence they go with machinery, these days even AI and robotics help.

So all in all, we can safely assume how this isn't going to be too simple, we are going to face a lot of trouble. So we should just avoid thinking about more creators or less consumers or anything like that and just try to balance the wealth gap between them, nothing more. If we can do that then there are no more problems.