Topic: world war 3 is coming ...do to coronavirus / economy ... (Read 1721 times)

Dude this is not Call of Duty where the narrative goes right. Did you know that submarines are the pioneers of stealth combat? Which means they can sneak past the vast ocean and launch the ICBMs anywhere.

Preparation for war does not mean that in the near future there will be a third world war, war preparations are also intended for security and protection of the country. After all, the current economic crisis is clear because of the impact of the corona virus, so it is only natural that some traders sell vegetables at higher prices. Why do people say world war is so easy? whereas the impact can be very painful and detrimental to all parties.

Get rid of the submarines also,track them and nuke the oceans if you have to ...simultaneous attack

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNNXecb6nA

Despite the chaos occurring in the international system, we live in an era of globalization and the single market, because the world is economically interconnected, and this leads to cooperation between countries, to avoid the world falling into a third world war, and as it can be said that the world today is dependent on each other so that there is mutual dependence A country cannot live in isolation from the global market, and the damage that will be inflicted on one of the superpowers is global damage that is not limited to one country, as China’s corona is the world's corona.

Have you heard of submarines? They are the insurance that there will be a mutually assured destruction. How much time you think it takes to know that an attack has happen? You do not know a nuclear nations capability to know who attacked, it is a complete BS about the thing where you attack first then the enemy will not attack, what are a samurai?

What the hell? You think launching all of the nukes launches instantly? Unless they prepared an complete assault then they can do it. Another BS, if you exhaust your resource in one attack then you will be vulnerable to other countries attack.

ICBM is the most effective because if you are planning a nuclear holocaust then you might as well spend the least resource as much as possible. Why the fuck would you risk a nuke train when you are country? What are you a Bond villain? You can't easily smuggle shit that has a nuclear on its tag which means you can't put it in a public transport. Why would a border guard accept a bribe when he knows it will cost a destruction.

Also did you know that when thousands of nukes are detonated even in just one country, the effect will be felt around the world? Did you know that it will cause nuclear winter that will affect the surrounding places of the fall out? There is a reason why they are not launching these bombs, the nuclear researchers have proven the effects in the long term after a nuclear fall out. Read about the Chernobyl so you can understand my point. The point of going to war is to claim the resources of the target country, now if you nuke that or sneak a nuke train like in Hollywood then you essentially destroyed the objective which is the resources.

Read this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster

Nuclear war does not result in mutual destruction ...that's a lie ... if you kill the enemy first ,he can't kill you after.

You need to attack him with all you got before he attacks you , you got to do it with a stealth attack.

If you wipe out his country of the face of the earth how is going to attack you after ?  

Why should i use  icbm's to launch an attack ?

You can just put 1000 tsar bombs on freight trains  and send them to the enemies capital and major cities ...you have to find a way to bribe the border guards...and make them think your smuggling drugs or something like that...

Plans like this they never think of ... they think always long distance attacks ...

A war will not be coming OP, there will be talks before anything else. Why would these egotistic leaders declare war and ravage the natural resource as a result. We are at the age of neo-conquest where traditional warfare is not the first option. Plus ICBM would result in mutual destruction which means that no country will benefit from the result of the war. Maybe anarchy will happen but war is a very unlikely thing. At this day and age the one who is the greatest is the one who wins without waging a war. So much conspiracy videos for a day.

All countries in the world are still suffering from the virus and they are trying to control their situation and get rid of it. Only for now China seems to have taken over this virus completely and seems to be back to normal. Also there is a rising tension near the borders of the China and this could be the problem in the future if China aggravates the tension further than things may look more dangerous for the world in future, else no one wants the war since it does not provide any solution but only destruction at large.

That's the thing actually. This may sound absurd but, we may say or not, This could be a form of bio warfare an attack that we can't see but it's happening.

"No sane leader of any country" - I could laugh at these, China's is engaging and uses this pandemic to widen there reach, that can cause a dispute to other nearby countries, in which can cause a misunderstanding, and in which could led to a war? Well no sane leader will do that, but not to blame chinese people, but the China's government is up to something.

"world is suffering from pandemic and economic collapse, it just don;t add up." - Tbh, this is an advantage to a powerful country that is capable of doing such a thing. It will add up when it happens, let's just wish it wont'

Although the United States has formed alliances with the United States and Russia the major powers in international politics are threatening each other in various ways. Instability in international politics is intensifying due to the Syrian civil war. Russia is deeply involved in the war on behalf of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Western countries including the United States are supporting President Assad's opponents in various ways. The United States has said it will retaliate against Syria over its use of chemical weapons in many will oppose this war.

It seems that what the US wants is not as easy as it has been thought so far because now it must be admitted that China is an economic power that continues to be reckoned with and of course many countries are related to China. It is not easy if you have provided facilities for all the needs that China has had at a clearly friendly price.
This attachment has been seen with several countries, one of which is the Turkish country that we know about that country so far.

It is laughable to say that the United States would form an alliance with Russia, to fight against China. As of now, Russia is one of the strongest allies of China, and the personal bonding between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin is quite strong. With all the American sanctions and embargoes against Russia, the latter is not going to think about an alliance with the former for at least the next two decades.

There will no war in my opinion and the OP saying that some countries are preparing for war is i think not true for we are in a middle of a pandemic now, and countries are always preparing for war for over the years but that is just to make sure of their countries safety, there will no such thing as war were troops are deployed and fight in a place. Economoy is a little bit down not because of war or something, it is because of the damage cause by the pandemic. I think 2020 will focus on the race towards a virus vaccine.

I doubt what is happening right now is a biological warfare. It's been quite long time when we suspected that the pandemic virus is man made and were created in China to incapacitate most of the countries in the world for them to take a huge step above all. Biological warfare is the most scary war that could happen to humans, before nuclear war.

I hate to see this kind of war, the most affected by these are the least ones, those whose intention is just to feed their family by working for 8 hours a day. 

This is already happening for ages, that's for sure, if you watched SNOWDEN then you'll know what's happening in the clouds.

In fact, we don't need a war, that new viruses to appear. They are the result of what humans do to nature, - due to their invasion of the wild. Therefore, many diseases are in many ways an environmental problem.

Knut is back to square one (almost). In the future, humanity will not fight with each other, it will fight against an invisible threat - viruses.
Now we have seen a clear demonstration that we are not ready for this danger. I can't imagine what will be convincing if a new virus appears during the war or worse.

war does not always use conventional weapons.
even now the war has started.
biological warfare.
economic war.
cyber war.
you can judge for yourself what is happening now.

We are enduring a WWIII but not in the ordinary level we are used to.
People are dying all over the world, in different nations and in different countries. There is an enemy in the Earth that we are fighting. Also, we are enduring an economic breakdown due to this crisis - same as it happened in WWI and WWII.

Do you still believe that WWIII is not coming anytime soon? 

Don't forget that the war against Covid creates momentum that each country is on their own policies based on national threats and emergencies. In addition, Covid also creates opportunities for many countries to test America's ability and resilience on all fronts, whether through military threats, currency wars, trade wars and biotechnology wars. The problem is warfare that occurs not between countries but also wars between countries and non-state actors. The worst thing is that there is currently no strategic formulation and a new threat spectrum from these non-state actors. Because in reality, they have their own agenda, they have tremendous financial power, solid networks and huge political power.

In general, wars are different and not only military, but also economic or political. Perhaps we are already on the verge of a hybrid World War 3. But we also need to take into account the political nuances that occur due to the coronavirus. If today the United States speaks out very sharply towards Russia and China, then it is possible that Russia and the United States may unite against China, since China poses more economic threat to countries.