Topic: WTF is going on with mining? (Read 3336 times)

I want organic bitcoins, too.
How do we implement organic bitcoin in the protocol?

I'll use my Antminer S1's for heating this winter.

Above the kitchen cabinets there's a 25 cm gap under the ceiling. I have an electric outlet up there (surprisingly yes) and I'll connect a TP-Link wifi router to two antimers up there. They'll be out of sight, but to reduce noise I'll underclock and possibly experiment with more silent fans.

Another one I'll have running in the office, also underclocked for silent operation.

Each miner costs about 30 EUR of electricity to run per month but it will be very cheap heating even if only 10-20 EUR of bitcoin is generated.

I hope Bitmain makes a better-looking miner/heater for the mainstream market. This will save the network from a 51% attack.

unfortunately, the people who live in those homes/ apartments are clueless.  They don't know what ethernet is.

would be great to have headed flooring using ASICs

  most do but millions don't.
many homes built in the 1950 to 1975 time slot just have electric radiators for heating.
 amazing as that is since it is really expensive to heat those homes.

I also know of two apartment complexes with electric radiators.  Many people use a kerosene heater to save money.  

http://www.lowes.com/pd_93043-88644-RMC-95C6B_4294765336__?productId=3471481&Ns=p_product_qty_sales_dollar|1&pl=1¤tURL=%3FNs%3Dp_product_qty_sales_dollar%7C1&facetInfo=

Bitmain can mass produce  heaters/miners

Lets say a 450 gh 600 watt unit  with some space in it and a better fan ie quiet.

case would be smaller then the s-2.   use s-1 tech 3 in the case a correct psu and put a ethernet switch in the unit.

 3 inch 1 out.


  the consumer just sees an ethernet jack a power cord and the on off switch. at 300-400 usd this would be a very nice heater. compared to the 150 kerosene heat I linked to.

Yeah once you get to the point that the primary mission of your mining operation is not mining, i.e mined btc <= cost to run, then its probably a good idea to call it a day. Perhaps one of the many sha256 altcoins will save the day for those BTC miners who are not able to continue expanding with the difficulty increase.

Most homes in the US use heat pumps for heating which deliver 3 to 4 watts of heat for every 1 watt in electricity.

Well you are knocking on the door of the next boom for btc miners.  Heating.

In the USA more then 5 million homes heat with electricity.  Every one of them could use  an ant miner s-1 down clocked a bit  put in a nice case as a heater.   That is a real market for 1,000,000 S-1s repurposed into space heaters. For electric heated homes.     

  No data center can compete very well with this.     What does the electric heated home have free power.  What the f do I mean.

Homes with electric heat spend watts to heat and get no hash 0.   So spend 400 watts with a 2x down clocked pair of s-1's you get about 300gh.  For free in terms of power.  You were going to spend the 400 watts anyway on heat.  So spend the 400 watts get heating and hashing.  This gives a BIG EDGE to certain people over any data center.

I plan to repurpose my s-1s into space heaters this winter I have a few home owners that I know with electric only heat. No data center competes with this.  so in the long run smaller mining will survive .    Even do very well in the winter.

ECO friendly BTC...heh, its BTC, but its 5 times the price.

This is an excellent concept.  I would pay more for organic bitcoins.

LOL. Man you are so bad intended. Putting a graph for a 1000GH at 500W and then stating that it's a SP30 graph is so wrong. Having 1TH is one thing and having 6TH is another thing!

Sure, but the point is, noone no matter big or small is going to continue expanding their mining rigs exponentially once profits drop below 15%, so its not going to reach zero unless at some point the said mining operation ceases expanding, then they will just go out of business. As the difficulty rises, manufacturing improvements taper off, then the ability to expand will decrease, but it won't cease. I think we will see this tapering happen after about 40 billion => the problem is, many miners are hoping it will happen sooner, it won't.

A rise in fiat would probably result in a rise in the price of miners to match.

The days of purchasing a 2 TH/s miner and pocketing $300 a week from it will be over after the difficulty reaches and passes 40 Billion ( assuming the general trend in the price of BTC remains constant ). It would be more like, 2 TH/s = $30 running cost, earning $35 a week in BTC = $5 profit. Basically, keep the house warm in winter plus $5 for a cup of coffee and a muffin / scone / donut.

this is what will happen in the long run…… lets say 5 cents a k-watt for power and .5 watts per hash    at 450 usd a coin .  no one earns money.

 zero growth without   btc  fiat rise.


this chart shows  a data center with all sp30's   and 5 cents a k-watt  no money for cooling and the gear was built for free.

no data center can do that but if it could it would tap out next year.  So we are going to see a max for data center growth.

Along with that, it still comes down to a numbers game. Once the difficulty rises to the point where the cost to run miners ( power, replacement parts, data center costs etc ) no matter the size of the farm, reaches about 85% of the income ( about a diff of 40 billion ), then the growth in the mining industry will have sufficiently slowed as the business model begins to approach a more conventional model of about 15% profit. Then you will start to see difficulty fluctuating up and down, rather than jumping 15% every 2 weeks.

With 'new' I assume you mean Cointerra with their new PH-center in addition to the KnC-Monster in Boden ?
Together they might have something like 25% of the Network or even more, then add the Chinese Manufactures mining on their own..
I assume home-miners are less than 15% and decreasing.

The 'problem' is that there is way more legal backup than before in addition to a growing public awareness.
Means mining is getting interesting from a business point of view, so it attracts investors and motivates manufacturers to build their own mega-mines. We never had this situation before.

The average person can't compete with almost free energy and cooling like you find in North of Sweden and Island for example.
Think of chickens, how cheap they are [when thousands of them grow up unnaturally in a tiny space] - no (hobby) farmer can compete with the price per chicken. And since all bitcoins have the same quality it's even worse then the chicken market, because no one pays a better price per BTC when it is an organic home mined one or pays less for an industrially produced under questionable conditions from people you dislike.

Centralization is inevitable in middle term. The only question is how long it takes.
And no, it won't have much impact as you might hope or think. Average person doesn't care about BTC's original idea I'd say.
All they care about is a secure and comfortable way to pay, same counts for all stores and sales points.

You're missing the biggest factor - the number of Bitcoins mined per week is constant, no matter how many miners there are. All miners compete for a Bitcoin pool of fixed size.

Now go look at the difficulty graph. 

BTC mining's a very expensive hobby

I think that it's the new miners that's  causing the problem. If only we could keep them out of the club ...

This is an interesting chart...

Irony is that if every miner stopped investing in more miners, then every miner would make a profit.

Tragedy of the commons ...