Topic: Wtf lauda is back? (Read 571 times)

not at all. as I said I have no problem with you as feedback sent to me or anything with your trust, as you said alone you're not a prolific trader so I can't say anything anymore.

Point is that when I will see you as active one and everything will go smoothly each time, I will start to trust you.

Believe me, even the scammers when they really need to do a paypal transaction they won't scam.

It is awful. Thanks for noticing.

Lauda is back. It sounds awful. Rather we can say the system has pull back Lauda to DT. Isn't there a script used in selecting the dt 1 member? It's none like someone has selected Lauda to be in DT. Learn here how the system works- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49143128

Shut up laudas chief asslicking gimp.

This turd the pharmacist said in public

I'm not sure if lauda is a scammer but  i will support him anyway because I am loyal to him..

What a fucking imbecile. How can you support someone you are unsure of being a scammer or not.

Get pharmacist out also.

Here are the scammers who support lauda

Laudas support group ??

TMAN -reported to be in a scam with lauda and owlcatz
Blazed
suchmoon (*suchscamoon) a self diagnosed scammer
owlcatz - reported to be in a scam with lauda and tman
JohnUser - only trusted by Lauda and owlcatz HMMMM
BitcoinPenny
The Pharmacist - but he says in his post history does not know if lauda is a scammer or not but will support him out of loyalty anyway...sounds like a good plan???

hmmmm well I see TMAN, THE PHARMACIST OWLCATZ  SUCHMOON  JohnUser that is only there because of owlcatz and lauda lol


So let's break this down

TMAN and OWLcats = are they  part of the same apparent scam as Lauda? the extortion one?

Johnuser = only there because of owlcatz and lauda lol

The pharmacist  says I don't know if lauda is a scammer or not but I will support him because I am his loyal bitch anyway.

Suchmoon = well he is now looking like a total scammer by his own definition of a scammer and the same criteria he has used to justify leaving the red scam tags on many people  ... .like suchmoon says you protect or enable scammers you are a scammer yourself.

Hey thanks for looking - I've just started reading DefaultTrust changes - I'm going to have to draw up a short list of ten people I trust here -


(slightly off topic - I just had a thought we'd see comatose accounts come back to life, but then realised they'd have to keep posting for their trusts to remain at the top of the list, so I doubt we'll see trusts yo-yoing too much as people come and go depending on their own personal circumstances) - give it about 48 hours for most people to log in and see the effects (and add ten people to their trust list)

This trust changing is tripping. I have refreshed it several times and Zazarb was included in DT1, than excluded, than included again and now excluded. Also I see trust scores changing every second. I believe we will see alot of ‘hate’ against this modification.

Yes: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dt

Actually, just had a thought, has tomatocage been removed from DT?

Check my feedback and you'll see I've done multiple PayPal deals where the other party sent either PP or btc first.  Check with gameristo, to whom I owe a bitcoin debt to and am paying back promptly every week from the Chipmixer campaign.  I'm not a prolific deal-doer here by any means, but I have done documented transactions where I certainly could have either done a chargeback on PP or not sent bitcoin.  I didn't come here to scam anyone, have never used DT status as leverage for anything, and don't ever intend to do any of that.  But I get it, that's what every scammer would say, right?

You might think my inclusion on DT1 now is overdone (and I'd probably agree with you there), but if you're really saying that you don't trust me, that's another matter and to that I would say to look through the positive feedbacks I've received from trusted and untrusted members.  You'll find some evidence of honesty in there somewhere, I kid you not.

Now that would be something for the bitcointalk history books.

[quote author=VINSIN link=topic=5095182.msg49142169#msg49142169 date=1547061896]
Have you checked the trust rating of lauda?

The animal is back: Trust: 261: -0 / +27
[/quote]

shorena's Red Paint ^TM makes me see this:

---

I'm curious what mine is now; it was 40: 0 / +4 now it's 0: -1 / +6

---

Speaking of unmentionable...

lol.

anyway QS DT1 will be smth for this forum lolz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVkUvmDQ3HY

One of the greatest comebacks in forum history. Still waiting on Quickseller's redemption arc though.

I don't say I don't trust you because of the negative feedback. Your feedback is 100% on reason. I don't judge you for it . It's totally normal.

I don't trust because I never saw anything regarding you putting your money at risk or you to do deal with real bitcoin business. You're just giving feedbacks here and there, that doesn't make you trusted, hopefuly you see my point.

Regarding the changes, I wouldn't care if there wasn't OGnasty, the guy that I trust the most in this forum (outside team of the forum) and Lauda that I consider an idiot and scammer.

edit: I care a lot about Lauda score. For example actmyname gave me a negative trust for asking for a loan right when I saw Lauda was out of DT. As fact, I did not noticed it when I asked the loan. It can be seen a pattern of me asking for loans during the weekend, I am a very bad person of managing funds during weekends. This was the only moment when I didn't care about lauda's feedbacks. Usually I check them myself when I am bored, hopefuly at a moment people will realise what's behind "lauda" username.

OK, just understand that I don't trust account sellers (and buyers) because of how the for-sale accounts might be used, and I've explained that a million times.

You say you don't trust me because I gave you a neg.  If that hadn't happened, I'm 99.999% sure you'd be completely indifferent about anything I do.  I never scammed anyone here and it's true that you probably do more deals than me here, but so what?  You do bring up a good point about escrow, which is the only way to trade with red-trusted members.  On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that if someone saw my neg for account selling, they would just ignore it and do business as usual.

Funny how I found out about the new changes not by reading threads but by two PMs by members complaining about you and Timelord2067.  Put on a helmet and git ready for a rumble around here.

Yeah, we've heard it probably a couple hundred times in this section already. The proof is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Can we lock this and move on?

Eh I am not so much an insider of your "trusted" community whatsoever you don't deserve a minimum of trust in this life.

You're not worth it. That's it. We will see, you'll scam again. I know that.

btw: saying that you will scam again means I know already that you scammed before,the  proofs are there.

Why exactly do you care?

You'd be surprised how many people trust or distrust the people from your list.

Just when I was enjoying my break from Lauda-drama. Damn it thermos!

Well it's about ethics. I get your feedbacks and I am ok with it.

Having red won't kill me. I am doing more trades than you here probably with this red trust and really goes well my work.

But really, lauda can't be in DT in any way.

btw I don't trust you.


edit: I figured out that this red brings attention and people come to all the time when I want to trade. using escrow they can't be scammed and I wont be scammed

Well, apparently Theymos thinks more of Lauda than the old DT1 members did.  Somehow I knew Lauda would get back onto DT, and I'm anticipating all hell breaking loose some time within the next 12 hours as people around the globe start waking up to a familiar bright red world on bitcointalk.  

I still don't understand exactly how these new changes are going to work, but there's a lot of chaos that's going to ensue.  But hey, you're an account dealer who's already been tagged multiple times, so what are you complaining about?

Edit:  Whoops, I wrote this post way too early without understanding the algorithm on which the new system is based.  That'll teach me to not effing read before posting.  On the other hand, Theymos obviously doesn't have any objections to Lauda's inclusion since he could have not included him/her manually.  Boss man is still the boss.